🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Это уже какая-то тотальная пизда, ребят. Пока владельцы пытались взяться за решение проблем внутри проекта, ситуация только продолжила раскручиваться... После удаления Ники Плаксы и Гаечки из ролевой, проект покинула Бебрина. До них вышел Парадеевич, а уже после него — его сорол-подруга Каечка. Перед выходом Каечка довольно жёстко высказалась о происходящем внутри ролевой…
Channel
𝗨𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗪𝗘𝗔𝗥.𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 🌬
@underwearews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003799525977 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @underwearews |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 26 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/underwearews |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 16 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 16 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 26 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
14 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 57.1% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 21.4% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 8 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 И снова «огненная» неделя, которая, к слову, даже не подошла к концу. По происходящему в чате можно заметить, что практически всю неделю администрация и сами правила проекта подвергались постоянному "гнобежу" со стороны участников. Во время анон тайма всё начиналось довольно спокойно — люди действительно поднимали важные темы, обсуждали проблемы правил, администрации и обще…
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Начало недели выдалось… мягко говоря, «огненным». Практически весь, а возможно и полностью весь административный состав покинул ролевую UNDERWEAR. Причина, озвученная самими участниками — «агрессивное поведение других». По косвенным признакам можно предположить, что ситуация накалялась уже давно, а последней точкой стал недавний буллинг в сторону администрации. Давление, суд…
❤4
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Сегодня случилось непредвиденное — ТРИЖДЫ БЛЯДСКИЙ пост на 15 телеграмм-лимитов от Нонны, для: Даша228плей, Морфи_я, Гаечки, и покинувшей нас после чистки — Нели Рей. Многие сожалеют участникам, для которых был написан ТРИЖДЫ БЛЯДСКИЙ пост, в том числе и мы. «УБЕЙТЕ МЕНЯ» (с) Нонна. Не переживай, убьем. Ждем ответных постов на 20 телеграмм лимитов! info | life | news #UNDERWEAR_чтонахуйпрои
❤3🍌1👀1🤡1
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Сегодня владелец проекта Даша228плей утвердила, что Диана Райс может вернуть вышедшего Богдана Данкара*! «боже опять он», Высказался Руслан СМН, пока Диана уточняла возможные пути возвращения вышедшего «выблядка» Участники никак не отреагировали, Даша же холодно сказала, чтобы Диана дала бывшему участнику ссылку, и чтобы он написал анкету. Ждем дальнейших новостей! * прошлые посты о Данкаре: …
❤1🤡1
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Совершенно недавно к нам присоединился новый участник к нашему проекту! И уже сегодня, Диана Райс обидно отшутилась на просьбу новенького Avice дать ему сорола. «Да ты пидорас», Сказала Диана «это дискриминация», Отозвался Руслан СМН на сообщение Дианы. Но новенький участник не обиделся и дальше непринужденно ведет беседу во флуде. Ждем следующих новостей! info | life | news #UNDERWEAR_чтона
🔥1🤡1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @underwearews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 990,200 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗨𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗪𝗘𝗔𝗥.𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 🌬” (@underwearews), 16 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/underwearews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.