2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 952–954 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 13:16
952
-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:46
954
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
38.6%
avg views ÷ 952 subscribers
Avg views / post
367
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
10 (3 July 2026 – 1 August 2026)
Views total
1,469
Reactions total
75
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
177 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
75
42.4%
🔥
50
28.2%
👍
36
20.3%
😁
12
6.78%
😢
4
2.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 10 we hold a reading for · 80%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @underhatt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
АУКЦИОН
Лот: 13 кастомных открыток, а5 формат
(фотографии и описание проекта)
Автор: Эдуард Димасов
Начало: сейчас
Конец: 3 августа 2026, 12:00 (GMT+3)
Стартовая цена: 1 доллар
Минимальный шаг: 1Р (для красивых цифр)
Доставка за счёт победителя.
Каждая последняя ставка продлевает время до окончания аукциона на +5 минут. Ставки принимают только в комментариях под этим постом, либо в ЛС автору для анонимных ставок.
Вообще она не просто "адаптирована", я её заново написал, сохраняя манеру своего же Насха из Казанского Мусхафа.
Я не знаю почему про это не пишут. Как будто выгрузили шрифт из одного места и загрузили в другое.
Уникальность ручного хатта в том, что это не просто "распечатка", при правильном издании — это уникальные книги, которые приятно трогать, приятно читать, приятно даже держать на полке.
Это возрождение клас…
Издательский дом «Хузур» представляет уникальное издание! 📖✨
📜 Книга «Му‘аллим сани» (Второй учитель) выдающегося татарского ученого Ахмадхади Максуди (1868–1941).
Впервые издана в 1892 году и стала одной из самых популярных книг в тюркском мире. Секрет — в простой и эффективной методике обучения.
Особенность нового издания:
Книга впервые адаптирована под рукописный «Мусхаф Казани». Сохраняет уникальную методику, …
Давно хочу сделать курс по старому Куфи Али, на котором были написаны первые Мусхафы.
Для пробы первый текст, написанный мной, чему будем учиться.
Хотя тут на примере у меня уже более поздняя версия этого Куфи, с "точками" (в виде черточек) и "огласовками" (в виде красных кружочков).
При этом я перерыл весь интернет, но так и не нашёл адекватных машков и прописей по этому Куфи. Поэтому решил разработать свою верси…
⚡️ ОТКРЫВАЕМ НАБОР НА КУРС «КОММЕРЧЕСКИЙ КУФИ МА'КЫЛИ»
Многие уже давно атакуют личку нашего менеджера по поводу этого курса. И вот долгожданный анонс :)
🌿 Куфи Ма’кыли — геометрический стиль арабской каллиграфии, из которого можно создавать современные логотипы, постеры, 3D-работы и классические композиции.
🔥 На курсе за 4 недели вы научитесь:
— строить текст в Куфи Ма’кыли по правилам хатта;
— создавать сложные…
Я только понял, что области с Мухаккаком получились самостоятельны по смыслу, даже если только их читать.
1 строка:
وَالَّذِينَ آمَنُوا بِاللَّهِ وَرُسُلِهِ
"Те, кто уверовал в Аллаха и Его посланников..."
2 строка:
سَابِقُوا إِلَى مَغْفِرَةٍ مِّن رَّبِّكُمْ
"Стремитесь к прощению от вашего Господа..."
3 строка:
فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ الْغَنِيُّ الْحَمِيدُ
"...то ведь Аллах — Самодостаточный, Восхваляемый".
think a…
В сюжете говорится так, как будто это всего лишь одна версия такого типа Мусхафа. Но Карахисари написал несколько таких. Не все одинаковые, везде виден какой-то поиск. Я сам смог насчитать и найти фрагментами около 4. Скорее всего их было даже больше.
Но это вообще очень интересно, что такая форма такриба была найдена исторически. Потому что таких ярких примеров в верстке (таркибах), особенно устоявшихся, не так мно…
Немного деталей.
Я даже манеру Насха немного переработал свою. Но с Мухаккаком пока есть определённые проблемы, не хочется превращать его просто в вытянутый Сульс. Пока ещё не до конца уловило изюминку.
Как нибудь может суру напишу хотя бы одну. В идеале вообще целый новый Мусхаф. Было бы эпично.
В таких работах прям целый кластер классических исламских сложных искусств, требующих реальное возрождение и изучение.
…
Сделал одну страницу по таркибу (верстке) "Мусхафа Карахисари".
Необычно и интересно вышло. Раньше всё таки делали вещи, особенно Мусхафы, не просто для функционального назначения. А как писал выше — это были целые феномены с разных точек зрений. Да... такой вот была исламская культура или остатки её высокоразвитой цивилизации.
Интересно возрождать такие вещи.
Стили: Мухаккак, Насх.
Текст: сура аль-Хадид, 19-24 а…
❤7👍7🔥4
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @underhatt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 257,566 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Андэр хат” (@underhatt), 952 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/underhatt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
