Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дегенеративный ИИ

@underfitted

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001727227642
TypeChannel
Username@underfitted
DescriptionБуду описывать всякие сложные и не очень вещи чуть проще (:
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/underfitted

Growth

417 August 2026 — 41 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:0241no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:1241first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
46
Videos
3
Links
28

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡922.0%
🫡819.5%
custom 590012358958304957549.76%
49.76%
custom 589999686657298098137.32%
🤔37.32%
👀24.88%
👾24.88%
custom 589973172106192961112.44%
🆒12.44%
🐳12.44%
💋12.44%
🔥12.44%
🤨12.44%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2023 to 27 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2025, 18:58 UTC66 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Эволюция и Будущее: * Гетерогенные Системы: CPU (менеджер) + GPU (универсальный ускоритель) + TPU/NPU (спецназ для ИИ). * Специализация: TPU/NPU доминируют в эффективности. GPU эволюционируют (больше Tensor Cores, новые форматы данных FP8). * Память — Ключ: HBM3/HBM3e, CXL, огромные on-chip буферы (как в TPU) — борьба с "голодом по данным". * Программный Стек: Оптимизация компиляторов (MLIR, Triton), квантов

💋1

10 Aug 2025, 18:55 UTC47 viewsread 10 August 2026
File

Пафосный фон чек (и это даже не спизженная первая пикча из гугла чья-то интеллектуальная собственность)

10 Aug 2025, 18:46 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Почему ИИ требует экстремальных вычислений? Описалово железяк как когда-то обещано было [Представьте схему: Слева - CPU (несколько крупных сложных ядер). В центре - GPU (море мелких ядер + блоки Tensor Cores). Справа - TPU (сетка systolic array + огромный блок on-chip памяти). Снизу - NPU (маленький чип с акцентом на энергоэффективность). Стрелки: Данные -> Память -> Вычисления] представили? Понравилось? Мне честно т

custom 58999968665729809811

10 Jun 2025, 07:11 UTC56 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ну и естественно авторская научная картинка для эстетов 💅

10 Jun 2025, 07:10 UTC52 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Confusion Matrix: Как отличить угадал от «угадал» Нежнейшего дня рабочему классу, это я Инсайт и топик сегодня конфьюжн матрица (матрица ошибок, conf matrix, да да, я из Англии) 💅 💅— инструмент, который покажет, когда ваша модель косячит в моментах классификации. Каждое потенциальное ее значение строится на основе предсказания и фактического значения, на примере: Парень предсказывает: «Девушка ответит на сообщени

custom 58999968665729809811custom 59001235895830495751

8 Jun 2025, 20:43 UTC42 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ну что за элегантные возможности госпаде

custom 59001235895830495753custom 58997317210619296111custom 58999968665729809811

8 Jun 2025, 20:34 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://t.me/boost/underfitted чисто интереса ради хоть посмотреть жамкните

1

8 Jun 2025, 20:19 UTC41 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Очередной роскошнейший авторский график (подтянуть за авторское право меня все проще) - пример обучения модельки на обучающей выборке и видим солидное такое запоминание происходящего, до совершенно лишних деталей, что в случае экстраполяции этой модельки и ее знаний на новые данные ну маловероятно что к чему-то хорошему и доброму приведут

👾1🫡1

8 Jun 2025, 20:16 UTC43 viewsread 10 August 2026

Оверфиттинг: Или почему ваша нейросеть — как такса в свитере 3XL Всем снова общий привет Сегодня о одной из главных традлов моделей мышиного облучения— оверфиттинг (он же переобучение). И чтобы даже Бобик понял, объясню на его любимом свитере. Представьте: 1. Вы 100 раз замеряли Таксу-Вадима: - Обхват лапы (3.14 см) - Длина хвоста (ровно 2 пиццы) - Угол наклона уха при виде кошки (35.2°) 2. Сшили идеальный

1 Jun 2025, 19:18 UTC49 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вот бенчмарк современный (бизнесово черно-белый для научности), на котором не так все и плохо, но естественно никто на свете не расскажет, что здесь эти самые ллм как елка новогодняя обвешены РАГами, чейн-оф-фот логикой и прочими прелестями работы с текстом (о них возможно еще лет через 5 расскажу)

1🤡1

1 Jun 2025, 19:15 UTC49 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Почему ллм (иногда (часто(очень))) тупее Вали карнавал мартышки? Математика, логика и мемы с токенами Всем снова здравствуйте, это я и в последнее время нейросетевые коучи и прочие прелестники говорят о создании прям интеллекта, ассоциируя современные языковые модели с живым существом, мол не отключаются и тд. А тк журналистика наука для умных, хотелось что-то донести на этот счет в контексте одного из главных парам

1👾1🔥1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @underfitted. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2023, 20:48 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

Чтобы больше не возникало проблемы с тем, что меня нет и вам неоткуда черпать роскошный образовательный контент возникла идея нанять контента, который будет кидать просто интересные посты из мира ии по 1-3 в день, считай жвачка

  1. Да, го31%
  2. Не, пусть тут только один орк потеет46%
  3. Мне вот вообще поебать23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2023 to 27 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дегенеративный ИИ” (@underfitted), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/underfitted.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.