Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Штанчаев | Как есть

@unchuway

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

365subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002132191662
TypeChannel
Username@unchuway
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/unchuway

Growth

3653713686 August 2026 — 371 subscribers6 August 2026 — 371 subscribers7 August 2026 — 370 subscribers13 August 2026 — 365 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 364–372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:33365-5
7 Aug 2026, 08:40370-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:47371no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:04371first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.3%
avg views ÷ 365 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (2 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,297
Reactions total143
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

230 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6126.5%
🔥5825.2%
👍5122.2%
😁3414.8%
💯135.65%
🤪52.17%
👏41.74%
🙏31.30%
👻10.435%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC39 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Люди не хотят трансформации. Люди хотят расширенного набора благ, оставаясь той же дичностью (Т9 по Фрейду) личностью. Удивительно совпала мысль и картина с выставки индийско-пакинстанского искусства, проходящей в Эрмитаже, одна из экспозиций которой произвела на меня эффект глубинной смысловой бомбы, разорвавшейся где-то внутри моего естества

🔥32👍2💯1

5 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC52 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Точка В не где-то там. Представляете? Она здесь и сейчас. В пространстве вариантов уже существует. Если вы можете себе её представить, то скорее всего она ещё ближе, чем вы думаете. И вот тут немного абстрактно, слегка квантово, но всё же: если ваша точка В уже там, то она уже здесь. Всё, что нужно сделать - это согласиться с тем, что уже здесь вы изобильны, счастливы, любимы, признаны, состоятельны. Всё, что нужн

4👍2🔥2😁2

5 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC68 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

А что, если ваша БОЛЬШАЯ ВОЗМОЖНОСТЬ прямо сейчас перед вами? А что, если вы её видите? А что, если всё, что сейчас от вас требуется, это сказать себе вслух - да, это моя большая возможность и я её вижу, - сказать как есть...

5🔥1😁1🙏1

3 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC101 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Дефициты вымываются изобилием. Как понять, что есть дефицит и какой он? Смотрите туда, где вы не изобильны. Скорее всего там область дефицитов. И речь не о материальном (хотя и о нем тоже, но это следствие внутренних дефицитов, например, дефицита любви или благодарности). А далее: 1. Наблюдайте за этой областью, отмечайте замеченый дефицит, называйте его, выводите наружу при помощи слов, текста, заметки (иначе сно

🔥53💯3👍2

2 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC103 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ещё про возможности: по закону слабых связей новые возможности чаще всего приходят от людей, с кем вы редко общаетесь. Поэтому, если хотите новых возможностей, то чаще общайтесь с теми, с кем редко общаетесь))

🔥116💯4

1 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC119 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Делюсь своей настройкой перед встречей (особенно значимой): 1. Формирую намерение на встречу 2. Добавляю к намерению благодарность (быть искренне благодарным в начале и в конце встречи), ясность (быть ясным и понятным, не туманить, не запутывать, не держать скрытую повестку) и возможность (видеть возможности для обеих сторон и идти в них). Эта настройка делает встречу наилучшей, даже если в моменте так не кажется.

👍64🔥4💯3

31 Jul 2026, 20:03 UTC107 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Люди чаще бегут от возможностей, которые идут к ним, чем делают шаг навстречу. Проверено, в том числе на себе. Нюанс: у возможности на лбу не написано Я ТВОЯ ВОЗМОЖНОСТЬ, БЕРИ МЕНЯ ПОЛНОСТЬЮ. Скорее, наоборот - чаще всего возможность похожа на то, с чем вы не согласны или избегаете или осуждаете. Видеть возможность - это навык и его можно нарабатывать.

6🔥5👍4💯2

30 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC116 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Жила-была Королева Упростила. Она настолько упростила себе жизнь, что когда в голову приходила мысль, то ей не об что было усложниться.

👍3🔥2😁21

26 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC177 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Королева Упростила любила баню. Но чтобы не усложнять, не парилась.

4👍3🔥3😁3👏1

19 Jul 2026, 23:58 UTC233 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Тему кроличьих нор считаю открытой бесконечно из бесконечности в бесконечность, что бы это ни значило ни в одной из несуществующих бессмысленностей.

5👍4🤪2

19 Jul 2026, 19:16 UTC182 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Жила-была Королева Упростила. Мир многим ей обязан. Гениальное знаете? Она упростила.

6😁6👍4

14 Jul 2026, 05:24 UTC237 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сегодня придумал просыпаться каждое утро в предвкушении. А каждый вечер придумывать, от чего в предвкушении я хочу просыпаться. А иногда не буду придумывать вечером, буду прям утром просыпаться в предвкушении ещё не знаю чего. Как по мне, очень энергопитательная практика. Уже тестирую вовсю.

🔥13👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @unchuway. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 91,948 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Штанчаев | Как есть” (@unchuway), 365 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unchuway.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.