Channel
@unChinable
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
133subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001418286806 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unChinable |
| Created | 17 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unChinable |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 133 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 135 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:59 | 135 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 February 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
45 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 62.2% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 22.2% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2021 to 27 March 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Че там Китай? 🤔🇨🇳 Вопрос, который мне задали за последний месяц 1000 раз, и никто не спросил про новые вспышки ковида (его же вроде отменили?)🤦♂️ Написать ещё хотел в начале всего конфликта, когда несколько знакомых китайцев написали мне и начали расспрашивать про все, что происходит, а потом рассказывать своё видение ситуации. Сразу скажу, у всех китайцев, которые мне написали, оно пророссийское🤷♂️ Да, не все е…
👍9❤3🌚2
Так я пока и не научился делать красивые посты в телеге, но пока оставим как есть: «Фин не может - эстонец поможет» или как сейчас попасть в Европу? 🤔 ⠀ В целом, на форуме Винского (офигенный ресурс для всех, кто много ездит заграницу, да и вообще путешествует) есть максимально исчерпывающая информация о выезде в текущих условиях. Но не всегда, как оказалось, релевантная. Ну, как есть… что поделаешь🤷♂️ ⠀ Маршрут т…
👍4
#не_особо_про_Китай Че там? Диванная аналитика снова возвращается☺️ ⠀ Очень много мыслей и переживаний по всей текущей ситуации появилось, которые постоянно крутятся в голове, решил, что напишу это скорее для себя, нежели для общего обозрения. ⠀ Небольшая оговорка: ничего не сравнится с тем, что происходит сейчас в Украине, и с тем, что переживает сейчас наш братский народ. К сожалению, это уже никогда не забудется…
👍5💩1
Красный день календаря для китайских акций📉 А вы знали, что на рынке китайцы используют красный цвет свечей, когда стоимость акций идёт вверх, а зелёный когда идут вниз? 🤔 Получается, что для нас такая картина может и позитивно смотреться😂
👍5👎1
实话实说、我不一定回来了🥺
👍5
Channel name was changed to «#Окитаевшие 🇨🇳 Жизнь около Китая»
Живые то ещё есть? 😂 大家好、我回来了😅
😁10
Буквально пару дней назад биткоин рухнул на более чем 40%. Всему виной политика КПК📉 Вот официальное заявление🤔 Суть в субтитрах, читайте😕
Создалось чувство, что большинство китаянок проходят подобные курсы😂 Курсы МС? Рэп курсы? Может все таки DJ? 🤷♂️ А может курсы ругани в волмарте за тележку?😅
Друзья, носите маски, Тогда никто не узнает, На сколько вы потолстели за этот год😷
这个题目。。。有人还用Clubhouse吗？🤷♂️
Как бы не тяжело было это признавать, но за период пандемии я даже соскучился по Китаю😅 ⠀ Шумные улицы, пробки в метро уже даже вспоминаются с легкой ностальгией, и даже кажутся уже чем-то органичным🤷♂️ ⠀ Но особенно захотелось отведать той еды, которую готовят в тех самых засранных чифаньках. Вспоминаются те запахи и та атмосфера, когда фунька кричит на кухню повару, что ему нужно приготовить. В момент открываетс…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @unChinable. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@unChinable named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#Окитаевшие 🇨🇳 Жизнь около Китая” (@unChinable), 133 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unChinable.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.