Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Продолжаем наблюдение • УМ

@ummtut

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

140subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001699376374
TypeChannel
Username@ummtut
DescriptionСоциолог, юрист, путешественник, гражданин мира🕊️ Наблюдения за выборами в разных статусах: от члена избиркома до исследователя. В межвыборный период – все остальное по сфере профессиональных и личных интересов. Мария Урюпина @umtut
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ummtut

Growth

1407 Aug 2026, 17:33 — 140 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 22:30 — 140 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:338 Aug 2026, 22:30
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 139–141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 22:30140no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:33140first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
88.6%
avg views ÷ 140 subscribers
Avg views / post
124
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held13 (6 May 20264 August 2026)
Views total496
Reactions total94
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
623
Videos
37
Links
66

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

240 reactions across 13 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5221.7%
😁4217.5%
🕊2610.8%
🔥2410.0%
🐳239.58%
custom 5960645610133527078197.92%
custom 5875419753740242762156.25%
custom 583252189526570113772.92%
🤝72.92%
👍62.50%
custom 584359435101956126352.08%
custom 577825212303252404341.67%
custom 585941677001985642641.67%
custom 584608903552880281531.25%
custom 589102666846149412931.25%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 13 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ummtut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC65 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Можно вечно смотреть на три вещи: как горит огонь, как течет вода и растет аудитория тг-канала партии Яблоко +20 тысяч подписчиков за день https://t.me/yabloko_party/6731

custom 587541975374024276285🐳1😁1

1 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC102 views11 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💥«Вы согласились с тем, что избирательный процесс — это минное поле» (член архангельского облизбиркома, 2020) В этом году многих яблочников «подорвали» на 20.3 — статья КоАП, устанавливающая ответственность за демострацию экстремисткой символики (как правило, штраф 1000 рублей, но на год запрет баллотироваться): • Николай Рыбаков, председатель партии • Штанникова и Шишлов, депутаты ЗакСа СПб • Артур Гайдук, депутат

🕊4custom 58325218952657011373custom 58910266684614941293🐳1

27 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC140 views33 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня вместе с кандидатом в Госдуму готовили и подавали документы на регистрацию. Собирались выходить из Сбера, а на улице — дождь. Зависли на секунду в раздумьях: подождать, пока стихнет, или идти мокнуть? И кандидат говорит: — За мир и свободу. За жизнь без страха. Промокла с гордостью

🕊1910😁3🐳1

20 Jul 2026, 20:02 UTC189 views35 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вести с полей: в пятницу мы выдвинулись, вчера список заверили! Знали бы вы, с какой радостью я пишу про Псковское Яблоко «мы». Мое отношение к Яблоку и раньше строилось не на согласии с политическими идеями партии (признаюсь честно: я с ними слабо знакома за пределами главного тезиса «За мир и свободу»), а на том, что этот институт стал точкой кристаллизации таких замечательных людей. За последние два месяца позна

22🔥6👍4🕊3

13 Jul 2026, 23:42 UTC194 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👉🏻 https://telegram.me/pskovyabloko/2681

🔥18custom 583252189526570113731

30 Jun 2026, 17:55 UTC215 views19 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Печоры В интернетах пишут, что это самый западный город «материковой» России. Но из западного в нём только эстонская граница, по вайбу духу он 100% наш-традиционный-русский.

14😁4🐳1

4 Jun 2026, 14:36 UTC229 views14 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ленин под запретом Так избирком Псковской области проиллюстрировал нововведения избирательного законодательства этого года — запрет на использование в агитации изображения вымышленного или умершего человека. Но как это касается Ленина? Известно же, что он — гриб🍄

😁14

3 Jun 2026, 09:43 UTC210 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

ворд: у вас ошибка в тексте

custom 596064561013352707813🐳4

29 May 2026, 13:45 UTC260 views13 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Выборы без КОИБов🥀 Вчера на совещании Элла Александровна затронула и тему КОИБов. Пару дней назад ЦИК принял решение вывести из работы КОИБы 2010 года: «Должны были списать их ещё 6 лет назад, они отработали на 146 160%». В 2022 году в ЦИК должна была поступить большая партия КОИБов нового поколения. Но из-за «жестких санкций» подрядчик не смог это выполнить. «Деньги вернули в бюджет, но образовалась технологическа

custom 58754197537402427627🐳4👍2

28 May 2026, 17:59 UTC183 views11 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Ни одна страна не проводит выборы в таких условиях, как мы» Сегодня в ЦИК проходило совещание по подготовке к предстоящим выборам. В нем приняли участие более восьмисот представителей семнадцати политических партий и их региональных отделений. На протяжении трех с половиной часов говорили о нововведениях на выборах этого года и все большей цифровизации отдельных процедур избирательного процесса. Председатель ЦИК о

custom 57782521230325240434custom 58435943510195612634🐳3

26 May 2026, 14:31 UTC154 views12 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Правильно, что в десятых классах отменяют выпускные. Пусть в следующем году отмечают.

custom 59606456101335270786🐳3custom 58460890355288028153

21 May 2026, 07:31 UTC317 views26 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Петербург: у меня есть парк 300-летия Псков: о, я тоже хочу Петербург: только не списывай один в один Псков: ок👌🏻

😁20custom 58594167700198564263🐳2custom 58325218952657011371

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ummtut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Продолжаем наблюдение • УМ” (@ummtut), 140 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ummtut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.