Channel
@umfaka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
800subscribers
+22 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002036389993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @umfaka |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/umfaka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 800 | +9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 791 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 786 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 777 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 778 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @umfaka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 April 2026 to 29 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
单就支付管理机器人来说，经过OKPay这次事件，再次印证了“草台班子”确实无处不在。 在此也提醒各位老板：是时候果断放弃老版本EPusdt收款了，尽快接入悠米支付。同时，坚决抛弃那些仅靠账号密码就能登录管理的支付后台，以及已经公开声明存在漏洞且不再维护的系统。 不要再盲目相信用AI就能写出一个“零风险、很靠谱”的系统——你用AI写的越自信，往往就越容易被别人用AI攻破。 承蒙各位老板三年来的信任与支持，十分感谢！ 欢迎大家继续介绍更多老板使用我们的发卡/会员机器人系统。你不是一个人在战斗，有任何问题都可以随时联系我们，我们一直都在。
🥸 检查您的安全设置 悠米支付（ @UmiPayBot ）是一个自托管钱包地址支付机器人（支持自助搭建），这意味着您是唯一控制自己资产的人。 加密领域有一条简单的规则： 没有您的密钥，就没有您的币。 花点时间检查您的安全设置： ✅ 确保您的助记词存放在安全的地方（不要放在笔记、云存储或保存的消息中） ✅ 确保已启用 2FA码以保护对钱包地址的操作 👀今天花几分钟检查您的安全设置。现在验证总比明天遇到问题要好。 #机器人 #支付网关 #悠米支付 #部署搭建
❤1
更新通知： 卖货机器人新增中英文分类描述，启用商品详情中的购买提示，用户中心添加用户头像(如果有)。 发卡版本号: v2026.06.25
卖货/会员机器人版本号规则调整公告 即日起，版本号由原“主版本号.次版本号.修订号”格式调整为“年份.月份.日期”格式（如：2026.06.18），历史版本号保持不变，新版本统一按日期进行编号。
卖货机器人默认模版: v0.9.27
更新通知： 卖货/会员机器人调整支付回调逻辑。 会员版本号: v0.9.30 发卡版本号: v.0.9.21 PS: 建议所有配置了第三方支付的老板更新。
官网强制选择，老版本已经用不了了。
统一回答一下，开启 2Fa 验证的目标： 预防管理员号被盗或被他人控制后，因意外进入后台导致的资产损失风险。 独立部署，建议强制开启。
更新通知： 会员机器人登陆后台新增支持 2FA 验证。 强制开启需加环境变量 ENABLE_2FA=true 附更新指令: cd tele_vip && bash _start_sh 版本号: v0.9.27
更新通知： 卖货机器人登陆后台新增支持 2FA 验证。 强制开启需加环境变量 ENABLE_2FA=true 附更新指令: cd umfaka_core && bash _start_sh 版本号： v0.9.19
❤2
更新通知： 卖货机器人，分销商品支持自动加价，分销与第三方商品支持自动发布。 附更新指令: cd umfaka_core && bash _start_sh 版本号： v0.9.15
建议所有的会员机器人更到最新版，以防官方强制选择支付方式。
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @umfaka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 628,193 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗗á𝘄è𝗻 开发机器人频道” (@umfaka), 800 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/umfaka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.