Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for English with Ari

Channel

English with Ari

@umatnaya_eng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

718subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002012445576
TypeChannel
Username@umatnaya_eng
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/umatnaya_eng

Growth

718729723.519 August 2026 — 729 subscribers20 August 2026 — 729 subscribers27 August 2026 — 723 subscribers4 September 2026 — 718 subscribers19 August 20264 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 716–731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 04:39718-5
27 Aug 2026, 10:54723-6
20 Aug 2026, 02:33729no change
19 Aug 2026, 21:30729first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 11 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3552.2%
🔥1319.4%
❤‍🔥57.46%
👍57.46%
🥰57.46%
💘34.48%
🤩11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2025 to 10 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 May 2025, 19:41 UTC≈1,030 views4 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Gatekeeping – yay or nay? 🤔 Gatekeeping is to make your interests exclusive in order to protect them from becoming “ mainstream ” Я лично считаю, что делиться полезными ресурсами и материалами - это круто. И обожаю интернет именно за это. В своей жизни тоже следую этому подходу и поэтому вы сейчас читаете этот пост. В том числе не хочу гейткипить свой классный канал с разработками и идеями для уроков английского,

🔥3💘1

4 May 2025, 09:09 UTC809 views9 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

Affirmation of the day 💕 Вам будут платить больше, и вы будете работать меньше 🙏🏻

🔥63

30 Apr 2025, 19:06 UTC679 views5 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Ultimate подборка сленга 2025

3💘2

30 Apr 2025, 12:51 UTC576 views3 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Как сказать “ДА НЕ МОЖЕТ БЫТЬ” на английском? 😵 Когда ты в шоке и не веришь в происходящее: 😵‍💫 I can’t believe it! — не могу поверить → She actually won the lottery? I can’t believe it! → Она реально выиграла в лотерею? Да не может быть! 😧 No freakin’ way! (разг.) — да быть не может! → He’s moving to Japan? No freakin’ way! → Он уезжает в Японию? Да не может быть! 😮‍💨 You’ve gotta be kidding me. — ты, наверное, ш

❤‍🔥2👍1

28 Apr 2025, 16:05 UTC448 views4 reactionsread 19 August 2026

🎤 Разбираемся: как правильно читать имена звезд на английском! Насколько хорошо вы разбираетесь в зарубежной поп-культуре? 😏 Сейчас проверим! BuzzFeed сделали квиз, где нужно выбрать, как читаются имена селебрити. 🔗 Пройти тест Vocab: 🔹 pronunciation – произношение 🔹 celebrity – знаменитость 🔹 guess – угадывать 🔹 you're saying it wrong – ты произносишь это неправильно 🔹 get it right – сказать/сделать правильно 💬

2❤‍🔥1🤩1

25 Apr 2025, 15:02 UTC393 views6 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

🤓 NERDS vs GEEKS Давайте разбираться, в чем же разница! Лично я себя точно больше ощущаю гиком — ну не могу я быть ботаном, увы! 🧠 NERDS: 🔹 Introverted — интроверт 🔹 Extreme interest in academics — сильно интересуются учёбой 🔹 Socially hopeless — неловкие в общении 🔹 Diverse interests — разносторонние интересы (фильмы, игры, наука и т.п.) 🔹 Love their PC — обожают свои компьютеры 💻 💡 Interests: Physics, Chess, Sci

4❤‍🔥2

24 Apr 2025, 07:01 UTC296 views5 reactionsread 19 August 2026

4 способа сказать “ЗАЦЕНИ” на английском? 👀 Хочешь показать другу что-то классное, будь то мем, трек или идею? Вот 4 способа сказать "смотри, как круто!" по-английски👇 🔹 Check this out! — универсальный вариант → Check this out — I made it myself! Зацени, я сам это сделал! 🔹 Have a listen! — если говорим про музыку или подкаст → Have a listen to this track. It’s insane. Зацени этот трек. Он мощный! 🔹 Take a look a

3👍1🥰1

22 Apr 2025, 14:26 UTC280 views7 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

💼 Don’t let them take advantage of you Иногда люди переходят границы — и важно уметь отстоять себя. Особенно, если чувствуешь, что тобой пользуются. "I used to do everything for that company — stay late, take extra shifts, cover for others — but they just took advantage of me. No raise, no recognition, nothing. I’ve learned my lesson. Now I set boundaries and say no when I need to." 📌 Vocabulary: 🔹 Take advantage

7

18 Apr 2025, 09:03 UTC262 views5 reactionsread 19 August 2026

🎧 Говорим как Gen Z: выпуск 1 IT’S GIVING… Фраза it’s giving — это модный способ описать вайб, эмоции или ассоциацию, которую вызывает человек, образ или ситуация. It’s giving + существительное That outfit? It’s giving 2000s pop star. Еще примерчики: 🤷‍♀️ He was two hours late and didn’t say sorry. It’s giving red flag. 📸 This photo? It’s giving main character energy.

🥰41

16 Apr 2025, 08:01 UTC350 views8 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

A typical conversation with mom 💀 Так, ну а если серьезно, то акронимы – это очень важная часть языка, в Тиктоке буквально половина информации в комментариях в них. Вот несколько популярных акронимов: ▪️ BRB — Be Right Back («Скоро вернусь»). Когда нужно срочно отлучиться, но не хочется, чтобы думали, что вы пропали навсегда. ▪️ IMHO — In My Humble Opinion («По моему скромному мнению»). Это выражение пришло из 20

🔥42👍2

14 Apr 2025, 14:06 UTC359 views7 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Could you vs Would you 🧠 Сегодня разберемся в чем разница в этих двух выражениях просьб, которые начинаются с “would you” или “could you” . Стоит сразу отметить, что данная тема вызывает путаницу, и отчасти путаница возникает из-за того, что учебники, курсы и носители языка расходятся во мнениях по этому вопросу👇🏻 ▪️ "Could you" — про способность (мягче, для повседневных ситуаций): "Could you pass the salt?" (Может

6👍1

11 Apr 2025, 07:42 UTC331 views4 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @esl_matePhoto

🎯 Warm-up ideas for your lessons Правильный старт урока = половина успеха) Я собрала для вас подборку классных разминок с Pinterest — они помогут включить студентов в работу, задать нужный ритм и сделать начало урока интересным. В подборке — идеи для разных возрастов и уровней, так что каждый найдет что-то для себя. Сохраняйте, делитесь и пишите, какие уже пробовали 💬 Идеи для уроков по английскому ESL MATE #esl

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @umatnaya_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Easy English
@english_master_academy · 72,890
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 August 2026
𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬
@linguatimes · 54,673
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
ENGLISH MIND
@english_mindd · 44,913
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“English with Ari” (@umatnaya_eng), 718 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/umatnaya_eng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.