Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ultroid Bans

@ultroidbans

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

42subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001702635593
TypeChannel
Username@ultroidbans
DescriptionGlobal ban system, powered by @TeamUltroid
Created6 January 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ultroidbans

Growth

426 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:1542no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:4942first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 6 January 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6648.5%
👍3022.1%
👎128.82%
😱128.82%
🎉64.41%
53.68%
🤩32.21%
😁21.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2022 to 3 April 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Apr 2022, 11:31 UTC≈1,330 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

New Ban User: 1422560261 Link to profile:1422560261 Username: @PRATHAM2007 Reason: scam

🔥61🎉1

11 Mar 2022, 11:39 UTC≈1,570 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

New Ban User: 834006300 Link to profile:834006300 Username: @CYRAXGAMINGYT Reason: BTC scam [fake seller]

👍4🔥2

6 Feb 2022, 08:26 UTC≈2,130 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

New Ban User: 2052365735 Link to profile:2052365735 Username: @Lucky_iscool Reason: We don't sell deployment service of ultroid! It is a free project and meant to be used for free. Charging for deployment isn't accepted! Proof: https://telegra.ph/file/c85772c11841d65021f80.jpg

👍8🎉2

2 Feb 2022, 20:02 UTC≈2,140 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

New Ban User: 1352495846 Link to profile:1352495846 Username: @Narutoo06 Reason: retard

🔥7👍3🎉2

23 Jan 2022, 11:30 UTC≈2,610 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

New Ban User: 5044999546 Link to profile:5044999546 Username: @Cutie_cat69 Reason: retard

😱5👍3🤩1

16 Jan 2022, 06:45 UTC≈3,030 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

New Ban User: 2135781744 Link to profile: 2135781744 Username: @SpeedoSekeer_999 Reason: Fake, admin impersonation to steal login creds.

🔥10👍3👎21🎉1

6 Jan 2022, 16:18 UTC≈3,540 views44 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ultroid Bans. [added with v0.4] Global ban system. Reports and status checks can be done at bans.ultroid.tech Ultroid would auto ban the banned users in chats, use .setdb ULTROID_BANS True in db to turn it on, incase you want to use auto-ban. ~ @TeamUltroid

🔥24👍7😱6👎5😁2

6 Jan 2022, 16:18 UTC≈3,380 views30 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Global ban system, by @TeamUltroid. Bans would be logged here.

🔥17👎53👍2🤩2😱1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ultroidbans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 370,607 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ultroid Bans” (@ultroidbans), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ultroidbans.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.