Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ежедневный Набат Карла Айкана

@ultimaconsulting

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

820subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001124002369
TypeChannel
Username@ultimaconsulting
DescriptionФакел разума во мраке бизнес-шарлатанства. 100% оригинальный контент о бизнесе. Какой он есть на самом деле — а не в бестолковой PR-хрени в мейнстримных СМИ. https://www.facebook.com/ultimaconsultingrussia
Created20 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ultimaconsulting

Growth

8206 Aug 2026, 02:43 — 820 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:19 — 820 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 02:436 Aug 2026, 15:19
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 819–821 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 15:19820no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:43820first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.2%
avg views ÷ 820 subscribers
Avg views / post
248
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held18 (15 October 202421 July 2026)
Views total248
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
175
Links
327

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

234 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12051.3%
👍9339.7%
🤔166.84%
👏41.71%
😱10.427%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2024 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC248 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Социальное дерево: шире взгляд

🔥7👍3

24 Jun 2026, 16:47 UTC810 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Социальное дерево — на смену социальным сетям Собственный целевой трафик — без Вбозонов, гуглояндексов и прочих парази… нельзяграмов. Социальное дерево вашего бизнеса: делайте прибыль, а не контент. Железный конь на смену крестьянской лошадке, товарищи! Ознакомляемся, значитца, за будущее электронной коммерции.

🔥11🤔3

16 Feb 2026, 16:05 UTC672 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Пока этот ваш Остап Альтман сулит AGI к 2025-2030 (и, разумеется, врёт) — по секрету всему свету об Истинном Пути. Без смс и регистраций. И — ни в коем случае НЕ подписывайтесь на канал!

🔥11👍5

4 Dec 2025, 17:25 UTC855 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В прошлом тексте шла речь о бизнес-модели гипермолла. Здесь посмотрим на логику работы.

👍6🔥1

11 Nov 2025, 18:38 UTC968 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Господа, последние несколько публикаций мы рассказывали про маркетнеты. Однако раз Гоголь сжёг второй том, то и маркетнетов не будет. Будет лучше. Просвещаемся.

🔥16👍2

6 Nov 2025, 19:05 UTC888 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Пока суть да дело — разогреваемся красненьким историей и теорией Open your mind.

👍7🔥3🤔2

5 Nov 2025, 06:01 UTC705 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Журналисты-злопыхатели клевещут: "Эксперты все чаще называют бум искусственного интеллекта финансовым пузырем.... В случае краха технологические компании потеряют сотни миллиардов долларов — и не оставят после себя ничего полезного". Осмыслим.

🔥16👍5👏1

26 Sept 2025, 14:26 UTC853 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Что год грядущий нам готовит? А вот что.

🔥9🤔6👏2😱1

9 Jul 2025, 14:29 UTC993 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Интересующимся судьбой затеи из последних публикаций Проект под названием Likechain запущен в июне. Для его продвижения сделали отдельный канал https://t.me/the_likechain_post Тематика – сугубо про онлайн-бизнес. Зато, можно сказать, про весь сразу. Кому интересно – заходите. А кому неинтересно – оставайтесь тут. Писать – будем. Да, много раз уже собирались и все никак, но причина уважительная. P.S. Любопытно,

👍11🔥6

25 Oct 2024, 16:03 UTC≈1,270 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сарафанное радио вместо маркетплейсов и Яндекса. Кому подойдет, юнит-экономика и откуда трафик

👍10

23 Oct 2024, 16:00 UTC≈1,200 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Рассказывая выше об успехах w-com в кейсе Юлмарта, мы говорили о (дорогой и уникальной) частной разработке. Посмотрим на серийное решение, доступное и вашему бизнесу – на примере рабочего w-com магазина одного из крупнейших в РФ интернет-ритейлеров люкса. Продолжение текста на vc.ru — картинки и видео в телеграм-посты плохо укладываются)

👍10

18 Oct 2024, 09:21 UTC≈1,120 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Прогрессивная бизнес-модель компании была насильственно переломана под устаревшие шаблоны бизнес-туфтологии. Отмена XXL Бонуса – только одно из серии Ррррешительных Решений. После чего, например, Юлмарту пришлось стать крупнейшим рекламодателем Яндекса. Что, разумеется, несильно помогло. Акционерный конфликт, коему в бизнес-СМИ приписывают крах Юлмарта, не был причиной. Он сам был следствием бушующего потока слабоум

🔥12👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ultimaconsulting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ежедневный Набат Карла Айкана” (@ultimaconsulting), 820 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ultimaconsulting.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.