Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ulitin.ru

@ulitin_ru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

673subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001205744290
TypeChannel
Username@ulitin_ru
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ulitin_ru

Growth

672673672.57 Aug 2026, 09:48 — 672 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:40 — 673 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:488 Aug 2026, 06:40
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 672–673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:40673+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:48672first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 2 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.2%
avg views ÷ 673 subscribers
Avg views / post
210
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held15 (2 April 20261 August 2026)
Views total1,049
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

155 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5434.8%
🔥5334.2%
👏1912.3%
👍1610.3%
💔74.52%
🐳42.58%
💯10.645%
😱10.645%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC144 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Отправить заявку на конфу в последний день? Классика! За последние 5+ лет в программных комитетах профессиональных конференций, я наблюдаю один и тот же паттерн - большая часть заявок приходит в послендний день дедлайна. Именно поэтому этот пост выходит сегодня - в последний день подачи заявки на ресечэкспо. Вот три мысли, которые помогут сделать их лучше: 🤑Заявка это не реклама вашего выступления. Часто спикеры п

🔥4

24 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC206 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @liptdesignPhoto

✨ Пятый квартирник с командой МойОфис На этот раз к нам в гости пришли Кирилл Улитин и его коллеги из МойОфис. Кнарик Джавадян, ex-руководитель команды дизайна, и Рома Шишкин, ex-руководитель дизайн-редакторов, рассказали, как у них было устроено взаимодействие между UX-дизайнерами, системными и бизнес-аналитиками. С нашей стороны Илья Базиян и Соня Гураль также поделились историей взаимодействия дизайна с системн

🔥61

24 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC277 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На прошлой неделе закрыл гештальт. 😎 Осенью в гостях в Липтсофт, мы с Ильей Базиян договорились провести встречу команд. Выбрали тему и спикеров, но за это время у нас все поменялось. Я очень рад что мы в формате ex-команды МойОфис провели этот "квартирник" и классно поговорили про выстраивание процессов дизайна с бизнес и системными аналитиками. Мои бывшие коллеги Рома Шишкин и Кнарик Джавадян рассказали про свой оп

🔥43

15 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC244 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если вы еще не видели мой кружочек для Research Expo 😎 Как найти идею для вступления? Недавно проводил сессию, которая помогла участникам найти идею для выступления. Если вам интересна тема спикерства, но не получается начать или наоборот слишком много тем вокруг и трудно выбрать, то вот несколько советов: 🎄 Новизна вторична. Темы на конференциях повторяются, редко получается придти с уникальной темой, которая нигд

8👍3🔥3

15 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC178 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ResearchExpoVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥63

2 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC273 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пиплсенс - аугментация, люди, пух. (продолжение) Максим Дорофеев (автор джедайских техних) провел интерактивную сессию по разбору причинно-следственных связей. Теория базируется на его «улитке Дорофеева» конструкции для аргументации Если …, то…, потому что… Вроде бы просто, но здесь мы посмотрели на то насколько человек изобретателен в имитации мозговой деятельности. Суть задачи была в том, что необходимо написать п

👍7

2 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC231 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пиплсенс - аугментация, люди, пух. Конфа проходила уже второй раз, площадка была таже, но! в отличие от прошлого года, с погодой очень повезло и открытый двор, который в прошлом году пустовал из-за дождя, в этот раз раскрылся на полную. Не хватало только пухососов. Несколько хайлайтов из двух насыщенных дней: Левон Гончаров, мастер-класс про работу с ценностями. Часто ведь бывает, а давайте придумаем какие то ценно

🔥6

22 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC306 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Про нетворк на конфах. Конференции это не только доклады, но и возможность пройти групповую терапию, а это возможно только если подходить к людям и открывать рот и улыбаться. Грустная история в том, что я часто вижу людей, которые стоят в стороне. Этот заход показал, что если у человека есть запрос на нетворк, то количество новых релевантных контактов это дело техники. Потому что мой экс-коллега Артем, собрал больше

🔥106👍2💯1

5 Jun 2026, 07:12 UTC394 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На этой неделе завершились мои почти 10 лет работы в МойОфис. Новостную повестку комментировать не хочу, так как все не совсем так как пишут в открытых источниках. Я никогда не писал пост-визитку в канал, начнем с драфта. В МойОфис первые несколько лет я занимался UX-проектированием всех основных компонент экосистемы офисного ПО. Тогда процессы, да, и в целом уровень UX-зрелости были недостаточно развиты и это была

19👏19💔7😱1

16 Apr 2026, 09:19 UTC949 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в 16:20 даю лекцию «Цвет в интерфейсе» на майноре UX-дизайн во ВШЭ. Если кто хочет придти, то велкам, напишите в коммент и я пришлю ссылку. Это не помню уже какая версия, темы которая началась лет 5 назад и которая все никак не отпускает, сначала в формате обучения в AccessibilityUnity, потом ежегодных выступлений в ИТМО, а последний раз я приходил выступать для дизайн-команды Липтсофт @liptdesign (ребята ра

🔥14🐳21

3 Apr 2026, 14:28 UTC410 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Выложили запись моего выступления с BiasConf, если вам хочется чуть более подробно погрузиться в то как использовать llmки для обработки больших обьемов коротких текстов (ака ответы на открытые вопросы) и что еще можно использовать кроме вездесушего ИИ, то велкам.

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ulitin_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 946,135 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ulitin.ru” (@ulitin_ru), 673 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ulitin_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.