я отменяю грустные смайлики в этом канале. грустных смайликов больше не будет. все.
🔥24😱9💅7❤5custom 53841561932183718325custom 53818445945750239522😢1custom 53620492964661904581

Channel
@uliapsy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
182subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001603663154 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uliapsy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uliapsy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 182 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 182 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
274 reactions across 6 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 49 | 17.9% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 15.3% | |
| custom 5357334118159883232 | 37 | 13.5% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5384602947126567429 | 28 | 10.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 8.03% | |
| 💅 | 12 | 4.38% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 3.28% | |
| custom 5355237469744799985 | 8 | 2.92% | |
| custom 5362049296466190458 | 8 | 2.92% | |
| custom 5370893703575511656 | 5 | 1.82% | |
| custom 5384156193218371832 | 5 | 1.82% | |
| ☃ | 5 | 1.82% | |
| custom 5381844594575023952 | 3 | 1.09% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.09% | |
| custom 5359581378193138129 | 2 | 0.73% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.73% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.365% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 274reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я отменяю грустные смайлики в этом канале. грустных смайликов больше не будет. все.
🔥24😱9💅7❤5custom 53841561932183718325custom 53818445945750239522😢1custom 53620492964661904581
искала своего парня на фотке, а нашла только жениха и будущего мужа!!!🥹💍
🎉49custom 538460294712656742928❤17custom 535733411815988323212💅5🔥3👍2❤🔥1
могу позволить себе прикрепить целых три своих одинаковых фотокарточки в один пост!📌 встречаю теплую и зеленую весну, всё еще поражаюсь укороченной европейской зиме, и радуюсь тому что светло, когда поздно вечером выхожу с работы🧎🏼♀️🤌🏻(извините я разучилась ставить смайлики в медийном пространстве…)
❤🔥13❤8custom 53620492964661904584🥰2
напоминание - зачастую не так важно сделать идеально, как просто сделать
custom 53573341181598832329custom 53708937035755116565❤🔥3custom 53552374697447999853custom 53620492964661904583❤1
аэропортная романтика меня и восхищает, и убивает. когда изобретут телепорт?
custom 535733411815988323213❤9☃5🔥1custom 53552374697447999851custom 53595813781931381291
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥5🔥5custom 53552374697447999854custom 53573341181598832323❤2custom 53595813781931381291
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @uliapsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 954,253 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юля Алексеева // здоровая жизнь” (@uliapsy), 182 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uliapsy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.