Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Юля Алексеева // здоровая жизнь

@uliapsy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

182subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001603663154
TypeChannel
Username@uliapsy
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/uliapsy

Growth

1829 Aug 2026, 18:17 — 182 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 21:58 — 182 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 18:179 Aug 2026, 21:58
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 181–183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:58182no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:17182first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 9 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

274 reactions across 6 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎉4917.9%
4215.3%
custom 53573341181598832323713.5%
🔥3312.0%
custom 53846029471265674292810.2%
❤‍🔥228.03%
💅124.38%
😱93.28%
custom 535523746974479998582.92%
custom 536204929646619045882.92%
custom 537089370357551165651.82%
custom 538415619321837183251.82%
51.82%
custom 538184459457502395231.09%
🥰31.09%
custom 535958137819313812920.73%
👍20.73%
😢10.365%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 274reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC352 views54 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я отменяю грустные смайлики в этом канале. грустных смайликов больше не будет. все.

🔥24😱9💅75custom 53841561932183718325custom 53818445945750239522😢1custom 53620492964661904581

7 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC520 views119 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

искала своего парня на фотке, а нашла только жениха и будущего мужа!!!🥹💍

🎉49custom 53846029471265674292817custom 535733411815988323212💅5🔥3👍2❤‍🔥1

17 Apr 2026, 20:38 UTC889 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

могу позволить себе прикрепить целых три своих одинаковых фотокарточки в один пост!📌 встречаю теплую и зеленую весну, всё еще поражаюсь укороченной европейской зиме, и радуюсь тому что светло, когда поздно вечером выхожу с работы🧎🏼‍♀️🤌🏻(извините я разучилась ставить смайлики в медийном пространстве…)

❤‍🔥138custom 53620492964661904584🥰2

22 Jan 2026, 18:44 UTC938 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026

напоминание - зачастую не так важно сделать идеально, как просто сделать

custom 53573341181598832329custom 53708937035755116565❤‍🔥3custom 53552374697447999853custom 536204929646619045831

9 Jan 2026, 12:02 UTC812 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

аэропортная романтика меня и восхищает, и убивает. когда изобретут телепорт?

custom 53573341181598832321395🔥1custom 53552374697447999851custom 53595813781931381291

9 Jan 2026, 12:01 UTC676 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥5🔥5custom 53552374697447999854custom 535733411815988323232custom 53595813781931381291

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @uliapsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 954,253 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юля Алексеева // здоровая жизнь” (@uliapsy), 182 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uliapsy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.