Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Керосинка

@ulianakerosinka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,097subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001177469899
TypeChannel
Username@ulianakerosinka
Description@uliana_kerosinka #HXZ1I Тут мемы, видосы и ваше хорошее настроение 👌 Реестр ркн: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673707e4772bb113f52656ef&registryType=bloggersPermission
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ulianakerosinka

Growth

11,09711,12411,110.57 August 2026 — 11,124 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,123 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,117 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,115 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,112 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,109 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,104 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,101 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,097 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,093–11,128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:4811,097-4
13 Aug 2026, 10:1311,101-3
12 Aug 2026, 10:5811,104-5
11 Aug 2026, 10:0711,109-3
10 Aug 2026, 13:2511,112-3
9 Aug 2026, 13:2111,115-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:0711,117-6
7 Aug 2026, 17:5511,123-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:1511,124first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.24%
avg views ÷ 11,097 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held36 (7 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total36,897
Reactions total4,516
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14,800
Videos
2,570
Links
113

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19m 47s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,516 reactions across 36 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,57434.9%
🔥1,21026.8%
🤣1,00922.3%
❤‍🔥1743.85%
👍1703.76%
🥰1312.90%
😍811.79%
👀531.17%
👏410.908%
🤯230.509%
🤩150.332%
🎄60.133%
🆒50.111%
💘50.111%
😱40.089%
🤪40.089%
👌30.066%
😢30.066%
🐳20.044%
😨20.044%
1 further kind10.022%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,516reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC686 views111 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Вы бы знали, как долго я искала видео на флайборде, где девочка умеет тянуть носочки и выпрямлять коленочки😅😅 Наконец-то нашла!😍🔥

🔥92🤩10🆒5👍4

14 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC865 views78 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Никитос, съебался😆

😁75🤣3

14 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC973 views98 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#искусствокомментинга Выглядит так, как будто он собирается порабощать планету 😅

😁87🎄6🥰4🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,080 views124 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

И конечно в русалочий день рождения нельзя было не сходить в океанариум на шоу Русалочка 🧜🏻‍♀️💔 Потрясающе красиво!

❤‍🔥75👍23🔥23😢3

12 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC679 views55 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Неизменно залипаю на флайборд 💔как же это мурашечно красиво!

🔥51🤯4

12 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC880 views71 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

То, что она ничего себе не переломала заставляет меня подозревать какую-то постанову😆🧐 особенно кувырок на ветке выглядит так, будто она уже не раз смущала ветку своим темпераментом 😆

😁36👀25🔥5😱4🤣1

12 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,030 views119 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Все чаще мне попадаются рилсики с красавчиками, одетых в стиле восьмидесятых. Сочетание забавной одежды и фитнес-тела выглядит великолепно, а? 🤩

🔥98😁20💯1

12 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,120 views157 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#искусствокомментинга Я так долго ждала, когда же в рилсовых потоках мне прибьет оригинал этого видео с оригинальными комментариями, а не с наложенным на скрины туберкулезным смехом))) Словом, ужасно радуюсь что дождалась 😆

🔥100😁50👏6🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC≈1,240 views163 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁80🤣65🔥17👍1

11 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈1,190 views151 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Знаете как выглядит моя зависть? Вот так 💔🖤 Это просто невероятно круто!

🔥120👏16😁8🤯7

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @ulianakerosinka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 582,507 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алеся Петровна
@alesiapetrovna · 140,788
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ
@dmitry_lukyanchuk · 126,471
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Керосинка” (@ulianakerosinka), 11,097 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ulianakerosinka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.