Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mannerheims son

Channel

Mannerheims son

@ukr_sisu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,589subscribers

+66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001945075162
TypeChannel
Username@ukr_sisu
Created19 June 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ukr_sisu

Growth

6,5236,5966,559.56 August 2026 — 6,523 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,525 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,549 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,596 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,589 subscribers6,5896 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,512–6,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 04:346,589-7
12 Aug 2026, 03:226,596+47
8 Aug 2026, 19:226,549+24
6 Aug 2026, 05:416,525+2
6 Aug 2026, 04:066,523first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
111.5%
avg views ÷ 6,589 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,350
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held24 (20 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total176,340
Reactions total4,550
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,550 reactions across 24 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁85418.8%
👍79817.5%
💯67514.8%
63113.9%
😢3728.18%
🤬3247.12%
🔥1553.41%
🤣1232.70%
😭1032.26%
🫡912.00%
🤡861.89%
🤔521.14%
🤓461.01%
🌚330.725%
👀290.637%
🙏290.637%
👏270.593%
🤯200.44%
💊160.352%
🖕160.352%
16 further kinds701.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,550reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈6,650 views180 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Зміни? Частина 3 Якщо попередні два блоки стосувались негайних змін щодо розподілу військово-навченого ресурсу та підготовки, то поточна частина стосується нашої фактичної неможливості ефективно здійснювати планування. Ми маємо статичну лінію від Сяну до Дону від Сум до Херсону. Що є основним для успішного ведення позиційної оборони по статичній лінії? Як загалом так і в операційних зонах корпусів, якщо відкрити

103👍51👏119🤔3💯2🌚1

8 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC≈3,980 views172 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В конце войны напишут книгу "утерянные перерозподилы"

😁1519🤔9🤡3

8 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈4,010 views187 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я думаю у этих полканов из угруповань, когда жена дома помощи просит, они ей тоже говорят: "праведы перерозподил и помоги себе сама"

😁152💯18👏16🤡1

8 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC≈5,480 views148 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Якщо бойове розпорядження старшого начальника починається словами: "провести аналіз та здійснити перерозподіл особового складу". Далі можна даже не читать. 5.17 (позатермінове про неможливість виконання) вилітає швидше швидкості звуку.

😭71😁51🤔12👍53🤓3🤡1🫡1

5 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC≈8,430 views243 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хорошо, что 11 АК образцовый корпус и отлично справляется с задачей обороны Славянско-Краматорской агломерации

🤣118😢71🌚24🖕16👍3🥴3😁3💯2

5 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC≈6,010 views99 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ukrpravda_newsPhoto

Начальник штабу 11 армійського корпусу Сергій Собко стане заступником головнокомандувача ЗСУ Михайла Драпатого. Як відомо УП, наразі Собко відряджений з посади начштабу 11-го корпусу в Генштаб та очікує на офіційне призначення та визначення своїх повноважень як заступника 📰 підписатися

43👍23🤔18🤣5🙈4🤡3🌚1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC≈13,200 views119 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Моральний надлом німецького командування після поразки на Марні та під Ам’єном призвів до часткового управлінського параліча. Якісь операції планувались, резерви рухались, але після краху основного стратегічного задуму, згідно якого відбувались всі грандіозні події минулих місяців, Верховне командування, навіть попри озвучений перехід в стратегічну оборону, не робило для неї потрібних кроків. План скорочення фронту,

👍71😭32💯141🥴1

4 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈5,970 views104 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пффф, у мене колись була максимальна їбанастично ідея щодо цього, але виявилось, що дронам важко витримувати максимальне навантаження при десантуванні

😁102👍2

4 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈5,890 views203 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @liganet

❗️Україна вперше здійснила повітряний штурм за допомогою дронів, які доставляли роботів, відкривши нові можливості, за яких безпілотні системи можуть об’єднуватися для виконання завдань, які раніше були неможливими. За даними Forbes, роль носія виконав важкий безпілотник, який доставив наземний роботизований комплекс ARK-1 глибоко в тил росіян. @liganet

🔥119😁45🤯14👀107👍6🤡2

3 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC≈4,820 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @spqr_ps

Станом на червень 1918 року німецька армія на Західному фронті опинилась в глухому куті, вийти з якого було можливим або через відступ і визнання поразки, або через новий наступ, в якому категорично не можна було програвати. Генерал Фош зробив висновок, що наближається переломний момент війни, яким армії Антанти мають скористатись для проведення власного наступу, якщо німці не атакують, а якщо атакують - поєднати об

51👍27🕊3👎1🤯1

2 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC≈5,970 views141 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Впрочем удивляться бездарности нашей или противника не приходятся. Не первый год воюем

💯8542🕊7💊6🤡1

2 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC≈15,000 views183 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В летний период противник очевидно наростил количество применения всего поряд по ближным и дальным тылам. Если в нашем дипстрайкировании прослеживается наивность и погоня за хайпом, то в действиях противника виднеется некая эмоциональная составляющая. Со стороны выглядит как усиленное лупашилово без четких целей, где под удар попадает всё что на карте гугл плохо лежало. Школа, сад, заброшенный завод, ангар, ларьок

😢97💯63💊6👍5🤬5🤡2🤷‍♂21

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @ukr_sisu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 129,395 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mannerheims son” (@ukr_sisu), 6,589 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ukr_sisu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.