Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
ㅤ֟፝ㅤׅ
@uiuonu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002555515804 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uiuonu |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uiuonu |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 12 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:47 | 12 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 212.1%
- avg views ÷ 12 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 25.4
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.44%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 September 2026 – 13 September 2026) |
| Views total | 509 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 33
- Videos
- 30
- Links
- 44
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 6 | 75.0% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
for dear ::: # lratil The person who would fall for you would be someone who believes that some people feel almost unreal. They'd see something gentle but distant in you, like a prayer they were never meant to hear. Instead of trying to get close too quickly, they'd let your world stay mysterious and slowly become part of it. In their story, meeting yo…
💋1💯1
Sticker, posted without a caption
for dear ::: # xoxoUnderyourskin The person who would fall for you would be someone who can handle a woman with a strong presence. They'd probably be drawn to your confidence, your sharp attitude, and the way you never seem to need anyone's approval. You'd be the kind of girl they'd spot across a room and remember long after leaving. To them, your confidence wouldn't be intimidating—…
Sticker, posted without a caption
for dear ::: # SaturnsRingsHere The person who would fall for you would probably be someone who can keep up with both your serious side and your random thoughts. They'd love hearing you talk about music, the weather, or whatever strange idea crossed your mind at 2 a.m. They'd be calm and logical too, but somehow you'd bring out a much softer side of them. With you, even an ordinary …
💋1
Sticker, posted without a caption
for dear ::: # themomently You'd probably make someone fall for you who collects little moments without even realizing it. They'd love the way ordinary days somehow feel different around you, like every random conversation could become a memory. They wouldn't be looking for some huge love story; they'd just slowly realize that their favorite moments always seem to h…
Sticker, posted without a caption
for dear ::: # QILXDI You'd probably make someone fall for you who feels most at home in winter nights and blue lights. They'd be calm on the outside, but have a whole world going on in their head. Your cold, distant vibe would make them curious instead of pushing them away. They'd keep coming back, trying to understand the person behind all that blue.
💯1
Sticker, posted without a caption
for dear ::: # BlueZone_505 The person who would fall for you would be someone who never knows how to feel things halfway. They'd be a little reckless, easily excited, and always looking for something that makes life feel bigger. Your strange mix of sweetness and chaos would keep pulling them back, even when they told themselves not to care. Somewhere between all the r…
💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @uiuonu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ ㅤ֟፝ㅤׅ ” (@uiuonu), 12 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uiuonu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.