Channel
@ugolok_ya_miko
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002098669430 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ugolok_ya_miko |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ugolok_ya_miko |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 51 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 52 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 53 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 54 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 54 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
51 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 16 | 31.4% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 25.5% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 9.80% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 9.80% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 7.84% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 7.84% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.92% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 3.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Короче вот эта работа с ивента Честно сказать сейчас она мне не особо нравится, кстати это адопт, ну надеюсь вам больше чем мне она зайдет хах ╥﹏╥ если не нравится можете так и писать я ее очень долго рисовала, но думаю, что за такое время можно было сделать большего, ну зато пойдет как летний арт в копилочку в комментах арт будет файликом хх #арт
❤3🔥1
моя работа тут вот последняя хех #щп
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ✨ @purplepunya @totokocatlover @revengekk0 @zloiri @Kind_teaa @Dash_dash_karandas @SunCuckoo480 @bbusshh0 @ErisCat3 @ugolok_ya_miko Всем спасибо огромное за то,что приняли участие и закончили работы в срок!!✨
Всем доброе утро, короче сегодня итоги ивента, я почему-то немного волнуюсь, хах или просто уже хочу его дождаться.. В вообщем я надеюсь вам понравится мой арт, я старалась над ним 30+ часов (у меня ещё и ибис сильно глючил, короче было много трудностей), кстати он получился немного другим в отличии от первого скетча, ну и я разрисовалась (надеюсь в ближайшее время начну доделывать старые полноценки и остальные долги…
❤🔥1
𝔅𝔩𝔞𝔠𝔨 𝔖𝔞𝔭𝔭𝔥𝔦𝔯𝔢 ℭ𝔬𝔬𝔨𝔦𝔢 🫧🪻🌌 я честно старалась хх короче, я не судите строго, хотела сделать пару скетчей, а вышло как вышло... может потом его еще поскетчу хах #скетч
🔥5
Чтож, я не умерла вот обещанная 𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢 𝔏𝔦𝔩𝔩𝔶 ℭ𝔬𝔬𝔨𝔦𝔢 🍃🫧 не судите строго, сегодня постараюсь поскетчить Блэк сапфира в новом скинчеке, а то меня же просили хх #скетч
❤5
С первым днём лета ребятки! 🌟🌼☀ хх я ничего не выкладываю извините ヽ( 'ω' )ﾉ #щп
❤3
Можно немного поактивить хх Скоро я постараюсь доделать 𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢 𝔩𝔦𝔩𝔶 𝔠𝔬𝔬𝔨𝔦𝔢 🍃🫧 #щп
👍4
Спустя несколько недель ко мне пришло вдохновение хх Вот вам 𝔓𝔲𝔯𝔢 𝔙𝔞𝔫𝔦𝔩𝔩𝔞 𝔠𝔬𝔬𝔨𝔦𝔢 🍦🌟☀ Ну я постаралась в вообщем 🍬 Летом обещаю, буду более активной, ну по крайней мере в какое-то время точно хех #скетч
💘4🔥4
Кстати всех с 9 мая! поздновато чуть-чуть, но я не думаю, что это критично хх #щп
👏5
Уже что-то вырисовывается, хотя я всё равно мало рисую в день эх... °Spoiler° #щп
🥰5🤡2❤🔥1🔥1
Извините что так мало хх.. Завтра будут ещё, я очень медленная.. °Spoiler° #щп
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ugolok_ya_miko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“°Уголок кильки°” (@ugolok_ya_miko), 51 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ugolok_ya_miko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.