3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 445–446 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 16:07
446
+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:17
445
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:31
445
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
459.8%
avg views ÷ 446 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,050
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.276%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
9 (6 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
12,304
Reactions total
34
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
48 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
27
56.3%
🔥
8
16.7%
❤
6
12.5%
👏
4
8.33%
🆒
2
4.17%
🏆
1
2.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На челябинском заводе Транснефти прошли испытания оборудования для электродвигателей и насосов собственного производства
Работники «Транснефть Нефтяные Насосы» провели испытания и проверку отечественного образца высоковольтного преобразователя частоты. Он предназначен для управляемого плавного пуска, остановки и регулирования скорости вращения ротора синхронных и асинхронных электродвигателей, насосных агрегатов.
И…
Тяговые двигатели Транснефти для магистралей будущего
Челябинский завод разрабатывает и поставляет тяговые электродвигатели для подвижного состава РЖД: от скоростных поездов до магистральных грузовых локомотивов. Решения команды «Русских электрических двигателей» уже используются в ключевых железнодорожных проектах и становятся основой для развития отечественного рельсового транспорта.
В линейку входят:
-ТАД 330: …
Челябинский завод «Транснефти» получил сертификацию «Русского Регистра»
Система менеджмента качества завода «Русских электрических двигателей» признана соответствующей требованиям стандарта ГОСТ Р ИСО 9001-2015. В основе стандарта лежат ключевые принципы: ориентация на заказчика, вовлечённость руководства и работников, процессный подход и постоянные улучшения.
📃 Сертификация крупнейшей экспертной организации в Росс…
В Муроме при участии Транснефти завершен один из этапов по созданию российского электропоезда для высокоскоростной магистрали «Москва — Санкт-Петербург»
Высокоскоростному тяговому редуктору ЭВС360 производства «Муроммашзавод» присвоен статус первой опытной партии (литера О1). Редуктор и электродвигатель являются основными компонентами тягового привода поезда, обеспечивающие его движение.
В приемке приняли участие в…
Магистральный насос челябинского завода Транснефти прошел стендовые испытания
В испытательном центре «Транснефть Нефтяные Насосы» были подтверждены рабочие характеристики оборудования по расходу и напору, вибрации подшипников, частоте вращения и величине допустимой утечки, подтверждены шумовые характеристики, а также контроль температуры.
Насос НМ 1250-260 может эксплуатироваться при температуре от +1 до +40 °С, КП…
Работница челябинского завода «Транснефти» победила во всероссийском конкурсе «Профессиональное мастерство»
Маргарита Молочкова, обмотчик элементов электрических машин АО «РЭД», заняла 1 место в номинации на изолировку катушки статора асинхронного тягового электродвигателя (ТАД-650).
Жюри оценивало габариты пазовой части катушки статора, качество намотки изоляции, отсутствие неровностей, размеры перекрытия ленты и …
Как это работает?
Недавно мы наблюдали за процессом пропитки статора электродвигателя смесью полимеров на челябинском заводе. А сегодня посмотрим, как происходит изоляция катушек ротора.
Внутри ротора (вращающейся части двигателя) 14 медных катушек. Они необходимы для создания магнитного поля, которое приводит ротор в движение. Чтобы исключить возникновение замыкания, катушки требуется изолировать.
Для этого повер…
Губернатор Челябинской области Алексей Текслер поздравил работника Транснефти с регистрацией брака
❤ В День семьи, любви и верности рассказываем трогательную историю работника завода «Транснефть Нефтяные Насосы» Михаила Ефимова и его супруги Ирины.
27 июня на главной площади города Челябинска состоялась торжественная церемония одновременного бракосочетания восьми пар. Среди молодоженов – работник предприятия «ТНН» …
«Уральские динамические машины» в рамках обмена опытом провели обучение для представителей «Транснефть – Синтез»
В рамках трехдневного курса специалисты освоили комплекс подходов, знаний и инструментов, необходимых для преобразований в сферах безопасности и эффективности предприятий.
«Знания и навыки, которые приобрели участники в процессе обучения, – это отличный практический фундамент для реализации проектов по у…
👍5
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @udmtransneft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 440,437 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Транснефть – УДМ” (@udmtransneft), 446 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/udmtransneft.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.