вопросов очень мало, поэтому советуем быстрее писать!!
❤3

Channel
@ubogiesquad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
56subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004325114754 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ubogiesquad |
| Description | основной канал сквада убогих |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 25 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ubogiesquad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 56 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 56 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (25 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,451 |
| Reactions total | 158 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
158 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 158 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
вопросов очень мало, поэтому советуем быстрее писать!!
❤3
с вами убогие:)) мы хотим сделать в ближайшее время трансляцию в нашем тгк, где будем отвечать на ваши вопросы про сквад, идеи, лор, планы и вообще что угодно в пределах разумного. написать в нашу анонку можно уже сейчас. когда наберётся нормальное количество вопросов, мы объявим дату и время трансляции. присутствовать и отвечать будут пару желающих участников сквада
❤8
это дабыл ю зовоз
❤7
Signed klюшka0152 #убогая
я по нации уебенц
❤2
Signed линеа
чеченцам большое спасибо за понимание,ребята поменяли аву, вопросов к ним больше нет
❤4
Signed klushhhka #ybogaya
если кто то считает, что убогие неправы в этой ситуации, то прочитайте внимательно данный пост. мы НЕ говорим что наша аватарка как то запатентована, просто ради уважения (о существовании нашего сквада знали многие, в том числе и чеченцы сквад) можно было сгенерировать заново в другом стиле, и тогда это не выглядело бы как плагиат
❤2
Signed мертвый поэт #УБОГАЯ
попрошу сравнить аву убогих(1 фотка) и аву чеченцев(2 фотка)
❤6
Signed klushhhka #ybogaya
здравствуйте. я не знаю как там другие участники, но я (клюшка,не фейк)хотела бы высказать свое никчемное мнение. когда создали райский сквад мы угорали над тем,что они наши копирки,мол,украли концепт связанный с богом, мы не собирались реально ругаться. когда они создали щп канал написали «ждем убогих». ну а нахуя? чтоб просто посмотреть какую хуйню вы будете писать? сучки сквад неплохой,когда наша убогая девчоночка…
❤11
Signed klushhhka #ybogaya
🔂с вами убогие:)) совсем недавно появилась порция новых копирок. некий сквад из бимбо девочек название которого мы упоминать не будем буквально спиздил концепт нашей аватарки и в целом можно сказать нашего символа, сгенерировав это в таком же стиле. хуярим дисс? 🤩ubogie squad ни к чему не призывает, и все наши действия не несут серьезного посыла.
❤9
КОНКУРС НА ЛУЧШИЙ ЗАВОЗ🎁 завоз - это когда ты придумываешь что то настолько ебанутое, что никто до тебя даже не додумался. нам нужна именно ваша сумасшедшая идея связанная со сквадом, которую мы реально исполним. ✍️УСЛОВИЯ: • придумайте оригинальный и крутой концепт для завоза (вообще всё касаемое нас) • по желанию репост в свой тгк или в любую группу / чат с другом (шанс на победу выше) • кинуть в комментарии скри…
❤10
напоминаем, что у нашего сквада есть тик ток! подписывайтесь и следите за нами. нам будет очень приятно🌷
❤4
Signed #𝗦𝗨𝗞𝗛𝗔𝗸𝘃𝗮𝘇𝘇𝗮𝗿🐾 𝗡𝗠 #𝘆𝗯𝗼𝗴𝗮𝘆𝗮
✅️совсем недавно был создан некий «райский сквад». участники сквада убогих начали в ебаный рофл возникать, мол «че вы у нас спиздили идею». райские приняли это за призыв к конфликту, хотя одна из наших участниц ясно дала понять хотя бы одному из них, что мы просто угараем. (вы реально придурки если не можете отличить подобное) !!обращаемся ко всем: ubogie squad ни к чему не призывает, и все наши действия не несут с…
❤16
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ubogiesquad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 531,475 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ubogie Squad” (@ubogiesquad), 56 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ubogiesquad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.