there are so many views here, I'm surprised. but I'm still here, although not very often.
Signed luna

Channel
@uarmyfvrtluv
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001366918892 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uarmyfvrtluv |
| Created | 15 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uarmyfvrtluv |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 20:42 | 28 | -1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 29 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 30 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 31 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 31 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 24 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
there are so many views here, I'm surprised. but I'm still here, although not very often.
Signed luna
: I thought I wanted to start something from scratch, so I created a new one
Signed luna
my new page: mooonluu
Signed luna
https://youtu.be/71VFR3uKLDI?si=c2oXIWneK8oRVZXO
Signed luna
I want to start reading a book in english that has been on my shelf for more than a year.
Signed luna
«You are mad!» she snapped, her chest heaving. «And you are a devil!» «And you, my dear,» Royce imperturbably replied, «are a bitch.» With that, he turned to the horrified friar and unhesitatingly announced, «The lady and I wish to be wed.»
Signed luna
I smell lilac. this reminds me of spring
Signed luna
it’s like a lost feeling that you’re trying to fight and you don’t have the strength to return to it.
Signed lunabahng
vieilles photos du passé.
Signed lunabahng
❞I'm always wait for u❝ — your luna
Signed lunabahng
Pas un jour ne passe sans que je ne pense à toi
Signed lunabahng
J'entends les oiseaux chanter depuis le matin.
Signed lunabahng
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @uarmyfvrtluv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“absent.” (@uarmyfvrtluv), 28 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uarmyfvrtluv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.