Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ 𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗒 𝖽𝗈𝗅𝗅‌ ‌. ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌

@u7halc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

786subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002150420261
TypeChannel
Username@u7halc
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/u7halc

Growth

773786779.56 Aug 2026, 18:33 — 773 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:12 — 786 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:337 Aug 2026, 02:12
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 771–788 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:12786+13
6 Aug 2026, 18:33773first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.81%
avg views ÷ 786 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.2
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (6 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total142
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC11 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mixoOzPhoto

⎯𝚬rēs mı fuerza ęᥢ lᦅs días dıfícıles.

6 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC16 viewsread 6 August 2026

یکی دیگه از چنلای موردعلاقم،همیشه خیلی باسلیقه و باکیفیت و خوش وایب.

6 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC15 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @llcarolIPhoto

Cinema Verité, (1981) 人月

6 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC11 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Alpenglow_93Photo

در روزهایی که مرگ، آرام‌تر از زندگی به نظر می‌رسید و تنهایی تنها پناهِ من بود، تو مثل تکه‌ای آفتابِ ناگهانی، روی دیوارهای سردِ اتاقم تابیدی. درست همان‌جایی که ناامیدی تا عمیق‌ترین گوشه‌های قلبم ریشه دوانده بود، تو آمدی. روزها همان روزها بودند، خیابان‌ها همان خیابان‌ها، و آسمان همان رنگ همیشگی را داشت؛ اما از لحظه‌ای که تو وارد دنیایم شدی، انگار همه‌چیز آرام‌آرام دوباره رنگِ زندگی گرفت. لبخندی که مدت‌ها بود فراموشش ک

6 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC12 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @vinurx

چشمـانت آن دو گـوی فࢪیبنـده؛ هنـگـامی کـه نگاهـم بـه نگـاه‍ت دوختـه شـد در تکـاپـؤی عشـقی پـاک و مقـدس بـودم امـا هیـچ نیافتـم گـویا که تـنِ تـو آلـوده و گناهکـار بود! پیونـد مقـدسِ مـا متزلـزل بـا گنـاهانِ تـو آلـوده شـد بـه مقـدسـات قسـم خـوردم دوستـدارِ تـو بـاشم و تـورا مذهب خود بدانـم امـا افسـوس کـه تـو بنـده ای کافـࢪ بیـش نبـودی حـال خـواستـار آنـم فاحشـه‌ای کـه تـو باشـی کافـر بمـاند؛ درون هیاهـوی تکبـࢪ غ

6 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC23 viewsread 6 August 2026

چقدر خاص و قشنگ، وایب فضا و ستاره هارو بهم داد جالب بود.

6 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC11 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @moonpianistVideo

«چشمـانش را گشـود و جهـان را آکنـده از سکـوت و رنـج یـافت.» ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @u7halc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 106,393 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ 𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗒 𝖽𝗈𝗅𝗅‌ ‌. ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌” (@u7halc), 786 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/u7halc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.