Channel
@tztmn2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,362subscribers
+454 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003912905921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tztmn2 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tztmn2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 6,362 | +283 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 6,079 | +168 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 5,911 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 5,908 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (6 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,584 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 【老师名字】：小琦 【老师账号】：@xiaoqiaaaaaa 【验证留名】：凡叶 【人照相似】：8 【颜值身材】：8 【服务评分】：8.5 【态度评分】：9 【课室环境】：8.5 【体验过程】：1.联系过程：下午兑换好了工兵券就跟老师约好了晚上时间，消息回复很快，全程非常丝滑，无需等待 2.场地环境：小区门口有划线停车位，进大门直接让保安开门就行，不需要登记，房间干净整洁没有异味 3.身材颜值：娇小可爱型，身高1.56左右，戴个眼镜有种邻家小妹感觉，胸B左右，挺有弹性，不大不小刚刚好 4.服务态度：东北人自带外向属性，一说话就笑，态度很好，有360度旋转吹箫和冰火两重天 5.评价总结：完全对得起6米的价格，东北人的性格南方人的长相，服务态度好，一次不错的体验
❤1
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 【老师名字】：冉冉 【老师账号】：@ranran147258 【验证留名】：台风大 【人照相似】：7 【颜值身材】：7 【服务评分】：8 【态度评分】：8 【课室环境】：8 【体验过程】：群里看到长腿大奶颜值嫩妹，老师俯拍的那张照片太抓人咯，直接梭哈竞拍。老师到了，第一时间约课出击。 到达著名地点，一进门。老师房间明亮，灯全开，人很大方。不同于一般老师搞个氛围灯啥的，看都看不清。老妹儿说话稍带一点口音，一口一个哥给你叫着，态度还是很到位的。身高挺高有167，胸大软，皮肤是黄皮有一些白，颜值跟照片有差，但化了妆还不错的，还有隐藏版本，后头再说。总体满意，于是脱衣洗澡，自己洗的。一次性用品备的比较齐全，比较卫生。基本没啥服务，舔熊开口。口没齿感，口技没有专业老师那么厉害，但还是舒服的。然后就进入正题了。170的老师，我都…
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 【老师名字】：晋怡 【老师账号】：@yare160 【验证留名】：God bless you 【人照相似】：7 【颜值身材】：7 【服务评分】：8 【态度评分】：9 【课室环境】：9 【体验过程】：跟随冰红茶哥哥的脚步，一同探花，一探芬芳，见到老师很人情，一口不咸不淡的云南普通话，听的我上头，皮肤偏黄黑皮，正常肤色，是少妇，长相甜美，腰臀比不吃，是那种小号梨型身材，屁股肉很饱满，看起来就很舒服，肉感duang Duang的，老师主动牵着我的手上楼，洗香香，此女给人一种很慵懒的松弛感，洗澡的时候给我洗的很干净，很认真，细节，水中箫也有，事毕，上床，是那种会调情的妹子，三点偏黑，户型是小阴唇，看起来不错，骚的，大屁坐做我脸，一舔就嘤嘤嘤，有足交，我没要，这女的真骚啊，我让她别舔了，可以了可以了，她还是意犹未尽的给我口，说实话情绪价值很高，…
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 【老师名字】：依依 【老师账号】：@gdgbdn1 【验证留名】：尘鞍 【人照相似】：7 【颜值身材】：6 【服务评分】：8 【态度评分】：8 【课室环境】：7 【体验过程】：出击出击！提前跟老师确认时间果断出击，果然出击的路上时间都变快了，提前到达目的地。 开门，极品少妇人妻，熟女的气息，老师打扮的很性感，二弟当场树立，引导入室，氛围感很强，老师也很热情，交上水费，然后三下五除二把衣服脱掉，被老师牵着拉去洗澡，水中萧洗的二弟麻酥酥的，赶紧擦干，来到床上，B面服务直接拉满，按摩使人身心舒爽，最后来发大毒🐉，课程有的都有，A面也是，老师的口便入热水袋一样，炽热灵活的小舌头也是畅快，最后受不了了，戴套正戏，传教，女上，后入，反正老师叫的很骚很配合，反正最后脑子一热就爽出了，畅快畅快。
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-10 【老师名字】：禧朵 【老师账号】：@zhu6876 【验证留名】：不爱老师有前科鸭 【人照相似】：8 【颜值身材】：8 【服务评分】：9 【态度评分】：9 【课室环境】：8 【体验过程】：台州来的新的服务器的老师，说实话非常的专业，虽然我在楼下稍微等几分钟，但是我感觉很值得，老师会跟你聊天，然后也会给你充足的时间寒暄，后面就是帮忙去洗洗浴，这个洗不是随便那种简单的洗，从后面到前面到水萧那种洗，很自然很到位。口也很厉害。然后ab面服务，说实话服务项目有什么老师都有做，老师颜值也是服务系算是很美丽了。做爱老师摇摇车也是一流弄累了，到我传教士老师投入的表情和喘气很动心，很有反馈，接下来就是后入老师的黑色情趣内衣给人的视觉效果很棒最后爽出，做爱中也有骚话。很棒。
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-10 【老师名字】：禧朵 【老师账号】：@zhu6876 【验证留名】：God bless you 【人照相似】：8 【颜值身材】：6.5 【服务评分】：8 【态度评分】：9 【课室环境】：8 【体验过程】：丝滑约课，无罚站，见到老师，包臀小短裙，前凸后翘，个子比较矮，皮肤比较白，看起来蛮可爱的，上楼洗澡，陪浴很认真，大奶子在我身上蹭来蹭去，我抱着老师，一手蹂躏着大屁股，一手捏着奶子，有水中萧，上床B面不错，毒龙，舔蛋很丝滑，A面从胸开始舔到吊，服务很到位，不喊停不会停，戴套传教士起手，很润很湿，大屁股堆起来很爽，由于老师比较矮，阴道也比较浅，每一下都桩到底，很带劲，还会时不时吸着我奶头，体验感很好，桩干也不错，换后入，大力抽插，淫水多到泛滥，屁股一批都是湿哒哒的，小烧杯，各种姿势来一遍，狂抽猛送三千下，爽出 服务系少妇，体验感挺好，矮矮的…
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-10 【老师名字】：禧朵 【老师账号】：@zhu6876 【验证留名】：GGbang 【人照相似】：8 【颜值身材】：7 【服务评分】：8 【态度评分】：8 【课室环境】：7 【体验过程】：台风天，丝滑约课，无罚站，见到老师，矮居居的少妇，前凸后翘大屁股，白白嫩嫩的，相谈盛欢上楼，洗香香，服务系的陪浴细节还是很到位，打了沐浴露，奶子醒来蹭去，水中萧，一顿丝滑的流程。开始正题，B面 蛇漫 毒龙 舔蛋，A面口的很舒服，戴套女上起手，少妇的女上总是带劲很多，女上就是女桩男，匐身舔着我的奶头，一边大屁股用力桩我，啪啪以啪啪，体力很好，可以一直桩，爽的，换姿势传教士 突突突，M字打开，很带劲，每一下都日到底，爽出。
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-10 【老师名字】：小旋风 【老师账号】：@EvaHolland8927 【验证留名】：茉莉花茶（养胃版） 【人照相似】：8 【颜值身材】：7 【服务评分】：8 【态度评分】：8.5 【课室环境】：7 【体验过程】：台风天最好出击，妹妹当天就要走了，原本还想着没机会了，凌晨2点小旋风在群里说接了最后一位，刚好也没事，我当场也是果断出机现在，吃上妹妹这最后一课，课室在某大厦里，上楼需要刷卡，也只能让妹妹接我上去了，电梯看门见面，妹妹确实高，身材好，看着妹妹但脸蛋，纯粹就一张还没褪去羞涩的模样，原生态脸，说话自带家乡口音，跟我打招呼也是哥哥好，一口一个哥哥的叫着，随后一同来到房间，抱着抽完一支烟后也是共同洗浴，妹妹给我正面擦擦，反面擦擦，牛牛也擦擦，洗的挺仔细的，相拥来到床上，妹妹先从口开始不断，吸的很用力，让我鬼头一阵发胀，一边抚摸妹妹的大花…
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-10 【老师名字】：Tina仙居94 【老师账号】：@Tina_94jjj 【验证留名】：红鬼JJ🐲（六根清静） 【人照相似】：9 【颜值身材】：9 【服务评分】：9 【态度评分】：9 【课室环境】：8 【体验过程】：晚上躺在没事，看到Tina老师的频道，发了一穿红丝的性感视频，立马跟心爱的Tina聊聊天，聊着聊着就把二弟给撩起来了，管他台风不台风的，只想证明我是一位优质的学生，立马起床穿衣出发，出门就遇到一颗大树倒在马路中间，真吓人。来到老师教室，老师来了一个亲切的拥抱，递给我一瓶东方树叶（我之前说过喜欢喝东方树叶）Tina真是贴心，太爱了，人美心又细，随后就是帮我洗澡，擦干身体，服务很用心，下雨天身体很累，刚好Tina老师也会按摩，手法还不错，先来个全身按摩，然后接下来就是课表上的柔式服务流程（很舒服很有感觉，自己感受去吧）跟Tina …
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-09 【老师名字】：卡卡 【老师账号】：@nsifisnfsif 【验证留名】：God bless you 【人照相似】：8 【颜值身材】：7 【服务评分】：5 【态度评分】：7 【课室环境】：7 【体验过程】：三件套小树人，长得还可以，微胖，大屁股，呃，不是专业的下海的，ktv出来的妹子，长得还可以，小码bbw，屁股肥美，开8是不值的，比较业余，但是有🐍，口了一下下，问我要不要戴套，我说好，准备不是很充分，套子很干，妹子做爱很配合，怼了一会，索然无味，离去。
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-09 【老师名字】：安妮 【老师账号】：@anan688696 【验证留名】：无欲无求 【人照相似】：8 【颜值身材】：7.5 【服务评分】：6 【态度评分】：6 【课室环境】：5 【体验过程】：原价出击系列之安妮老师。最近突然有个想法，满姐的工兵是想都别想，于是做了一个预算，好歹要把满姐的课逐个上一次。真爱无需多言，出击见证一切！此次约的是人称技术全无，只凭颜值硬撑的安妮老师。很顺利的约到了当天的课，看来这个价位还是有空挡的。不得不吐槽，这个地方的车相当难停，可能是地方不熟，最后找了个角落临时停靠，教室倒是很顺利的达到。安妮的脸和身材确实没得说，实打实170的修长身高，这脸和图片一模一样，就是皮肤确实黑了点，老师说最近太阳晒多了又黑了点哈哈哈，然后就是极具反差感的课费和课堂环境，老师的解释是这地方安全。挤进狭窄的浴室自助洗浴后上床，十八手…
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/xe9999ex 【验证时间】：2026-08-08 【老师名字】：Tina仙居94 【老师账号】：@Tina_94jjj 【验证留名】：硬脖子 【人照相似】：9 【颜值身材】：9 【服务评分】：9 【态度评分】：10 【课室环境】：8 【体验过程】：好久没看群里来了一个新的仙居老师，晚上就迫不及待出击了，老师课室很好找，环境也还行。一进门看到老师的脸真的很精致，接着就是自助洗浴，洗好后老师还问我要换什么制服（其实根本没心思看）接着就是B面略略略，果冻毒龙也很舒服，换到A面让老师把衣服脱了，老师的皮肤真的好滑好软爱不释手了有点，抱着贼舒服。接着慢慢来到正题，先试着臀腿了一会发现出不来，后面继续手打，老师的手法真的刺激。让我体验了一把从来没有过的前列腺高潮，本狼还以为是射了，结果老师说这个不是😂后面看老师有点累，就提出自己边看片边手打，老师也没歇着继续舔我的奶头，👂。终于在双重刺激下小弟弟…
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @tztmn2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 239,670 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“同盟会报告榜” (@tztmn2), 6,362 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tztmn2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.