5 measurements spanning 39 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 190–193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 12:58
190
-1
8 Sept 2026, 15:21
191
-1
16 Aug 2026, 07:06
192
-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:49
193
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:13
193
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 18 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
61 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
23
37.7%
🔥
10
16.4%
👍
5
8.20%
🕊
5
8.20%
👎
4
6.56%
💔
3
4.92%
⚡
2
3.28%
🍌
2
3.28%
🏆
2
3.28%
👏
2
3.28%
🤣
2
3.28%
💯
1
1.64%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2025 to 28 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tybikmarket. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 August 2025 to 28 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📌Полезные ссылки
🔗@tybikstoreBot
UC, пополнения стим, покупка премиум TG и звёзд TG. Всё 24/7 и с быстрым пополнением
🔗https://t.me/tybikkrp
Все о крипте, подарков телеграмм и способах заработка в цифровом мире
🔗https://t.me/tybiknews
Новости игр и гайды на программы и игры
🔗https://t.me/+H0Hulg9wMxZjNzgy
Склад с разными темками и способами заработка разложеные по полочкам
👑Создатель - @onetybik
🆓Многие не знали, что можно зарабатывать просто сидя на диване в телефоне
✉️Пиши отзывы на картах и получай деньги за это
🛡SeoSerm - твой лучший проводник в мир заработка на отзывах (в день до 2.000₽)
🥸Начинай выполнять скорее, а то скоро все отзывы закончатся
🆒ЖМИ НА ТЕКСТ И ПРИСТУПАЙ ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС!🆒
💪День рождения Telegram подарков!
Ровно через неделю (28.09) — Telegram подаркам исполнится 1 год
Первыми в истории были выпущены два подарка: 🎁Sakura Flower в 11:21:54 и 🎁Lol Pop в 14:27:00 28 сентября 2024 года, но официальный релиз считается 5 октября 2024 года!
🆓 Самая большая коллекция неулучшенных подарков
Была собрана статистика по главному холдеру неулучшенных подарков — @capper
Всего: 956 подарков на сумму 638 290 Stars⭐️ (≈ 9 574 $).
Если улучшить их прямо сейчас — это уже 72 666 TON💎 (≈ 229 396 $). Что примерно +2 358% к изначальной стоимости (по текущему флору, без учёта редких моделей и фонов).
@tybikmarket
🐹 Концепт сторис с подарками
Идея в том, что вы можете добавить свой подарок прямо в сторис и разместить его где угодно. Когда пользователь открывает такую сторис, он может нажать на подарок и сразу получить всю информацию о нём.
Как будто вообще не нужная хрень?
🎉ВСЯ ИНФА ОБ ОБНОВЕ🔵
Премиум-подарки теперь показывают метку с количеством подарков, которые пользователь может купить. (очень удобно)
Ещё добавлена подпись с датой (сверху подарка), указывающая, когда вам отправили подарок.
🔴Подпись на гифте станет удаляемой — ИМБА!
В бете тг обнаружили новую функцию, теперь можно будет удалять подписи за 1к звезд.🌟(цена возможно будет другой)
@tybikmarket
❌Как маркет telegram скамит на подарки
2 дня назад обладатель крупной коллекции гифтов из-за бага telegram market.
➡️Дело было так: при снижении цены «пакета» Snoop Dogg Onyx Black с 1700 до 1500 звезд мгновенно продался не пакет, а Plush Pepe, который затем был перепродан на Portals и выкуплен владельцем обратно за 4100 TON, при этом поддержка Portals отказала в помощи, а обращение в поддержку Telegram остаётся на…
😍 НОВЫЕ ПОДАРКИ — 10 октября
Креативный директор Ohuenko, отправил картинку, с изображением прямого намека, что через 21 день скорее всего выйдут новые подарки 🎁
👤
К слову, ровно через 21 день, у Павла Дурова день рождения 🎂. И скорее всего именно 10 октября выпустят легендарную куклу Дурова 🎁
Что думаете, выйдут?
❤️ — да, пора уже
🍌 — хер там
🎁 REDO УБИЙЦА PLUSH PEPE???
Redo уже торгуется от 170 TON
Как думаете, будет дальше рост?
❤️ — Дальше больше!
👎 — Дальше меньше!
@tybikmarket
❤1👎1🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tybikmarket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tybikmarket named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tybikkrp named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@tybiknews named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@tybikstore named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@why_agnss31189 named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КРИПТО ТЮБИК” (@tybikmarket), 190 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tybikmarket.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.