Channel
@twenty_one_problemos
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
86subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002805858655 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @twenty_one_problemos |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/twenty_one_problemos |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 86 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 87 | +2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 85 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 86 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:39 | 84 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 85 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 85 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
58 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 39.7% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 17.2% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 6.90% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 5.17% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 5.17% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Давайте не будем мыслить негативно. Да, можно сказать, что «Зенит» проиграл «Родине». А можно посмотреть под другим, чуть более позитивным углом: - Зенит поставил интересы Родины выше своих - Зенит помог Родине в борьбе за выживание - Зенит не стал идти против Родины - Зенит пожертвовал собой ради успеха Родины - Родина празднует победу благодаря Зениту
❤2👍1
А куда?.. 🤔
С промахом сезона определились
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥5❤1🥰1
Включились перед игрой, поели борща, выпили чаю, сейчас на поле пойдём, немного поработаем
😍2❤1🔥1
Нашёл своего главного врага
🤗3❤2💔1
Пообщался с турецким журналистом, который сейчас живёт и работает в России Оказывается, вся история с трансфером Батракова в Галатасарай упирается в отсутствие конкретного трансферного оффера: ✅есть сильный интерес ✅есть сумма, которую турки готовы заплатить (сумма солидная) ❌нет официальных бумаг Проблема в том, что у турецкой стороны нет железобетонной уверенности в том, что качества Батракова будут актуальны на…
🏆1💯1🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1💯1🔥1
Нельзя просто так взять и внезапно оживить канал Но! Сегодня у меня хорошее настроение (я проспал половину дня, ввыпил кофе и съел тарталетку с голубикой), так что почему бы и не поспамить что-нибудь с матча Ростов - ЦСКА 🧐
❤5🤣4🥰1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Меня поражает то, с каким спокойствием местные воспринимают атаки БПЛА Бабушки-работницы стадиона вообще не придают значения тому, что что-то где-то взорвалось, просто спрашивают, когда мы закончим снимать, чтобы закрыть дверь Таксист в дороге рассказывает, как прикольно ракета ПВО озарила небо, когда он ехал к нам на вызов Люди на улице спокойно гуляют, пока вовсю трубит сирена Интересно, конечно
🕊3❤2😱2
Ничего не знаю, ничего не понимаю
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @twenty_one_problemos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Никита Сульженко 3.0” (@twenty_one_problemos), 86 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twenty_one_problemos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.