Have a strategy, a plan, and just trade your plan. If you have no plan, you shouldnt be trading. And if you are trading based on what others are telling you, you shouldnt be trading

Channel
TaiwanBear Trading channel
@tw_bear
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
874subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001127957329 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tw_bear |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 31 October 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tw_bear |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 874 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 876 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:39 | 880 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 883 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 883 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 November 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
The circles are the levels most people sell their positions
https://www.tradingview.com/x/DDooT0OZ/
https://www.tradingview.com/x/q7ZGxtui/ Many people said, they would purchase a lot of BTC if time travels back to pre-2017. But I'll bet most people would have sold their BTC right at the bottom of any significant drop
On the weekly tf, BTC is ranging mid term, but still long term bullish. Not a single support has been broken yet. On the daily tf, as long as BTC doesnt close below $39600, it is still bullish. Even if $39600 is compromised, on the daily tf BTC becomes neutral. Still not bearish as weekly is still bullish. My recommended buy last June for BTC was around $35-37k (spot). If you are so worried, why not just close yo…
Hope you all had a fabulous Xmas and New Year🐻 We have made it through another year of trading such a volatile market! If you have not yet used to a 50%+ drop in a day, you probably need to think about whether crypto market is for you. Now I can see many traders are calling the start of a bear market. Guess what? They were the ones who were calling bearish BTC in 2020😓 They still not getting it - buying is more pro…
But for me, I will buy another batch at the second support at $0.16 as I know we are still in a bull market. My average is now roughly $0.28. Trading is never about buying at the exact bottom. If you think you can then you are certainly not doing it right. Trade smart🐻
Sand then dropped another 60%. What most retail traders do is they cut their losses (right at the bottom)
Let me give you an example. If I was to buy Sand earlier this year, $0.36 was the main level for me to buy as thats the first support.
Zoom out and relax🙄 Seeing the fear and greed index makes me laugh. Distribution most of the times occur in two ways: 1. Parabolic movement without much pullback 2. Extended period of sideways (range box) None of these has happened yet. Plus, sentiment is extremely bearish. I am laddering buy into your fear.
File, posted without a caption
BTC also the same https://www.tradingview.com/x/mpU6B7QH/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tw_bear. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TaiwanBear Trading channel” (@tw_bear), 874 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tw_bear.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.