Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🥂白月光🇹🇼懶人包-紅牌客評總站

Channel

🥂白月光🇹🇼懶人包-紅牌客評總站

@tw668896

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

513subscribers

+132 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003743344285
TypeChannel
Username@tw668896
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tw668896

Growth

380513446.57 August 2026 — 381 subscribers7 August 2026 — 380 subscribers14 August 2026 — 432 subscribers21 August 2026 — 468 subscribers27 August 2026 — 513 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net +132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 360–533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 20:23513+45
21 Aug 2026, 07:24468+36
14 Aug 2026, 21:45432+52
7 Aug 2026, 20:08380-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:03381first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.99%
avg views ÷ 513 subscribers
Avg views / post
41.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total164
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC16 viewsread 7 August 2026

#台北 #新北 #桃園 ⭐ 格格 162-F-47kg-24歲 女優兼職 嬌小 巨乳 做愛時像是在拍AV 可愛臉蛋 火辣身材 反差 #北部客評 1️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12263 2️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12265

5 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC37 viewsread 7 August 2026

#台中可約 ⭐ 雙雙 166-C-48-28歲 ⭐ 雙雙 更多客評點此處 模特兼職 配合度高 滿分女友~ #台中客評 1️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12410 2️⃣https://t.me/f645shiqi/12428

4 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC46 viewsread 7 August 2026

#台中可約 ⭐ 心如 164-D+-48-28歲 火辣姐姐型~ 熱情主動 見面會先給一個大大的擁抱~ 人照合一~ #台中客評 1️⃣ https://t.me/tg66yue69/2887 2️⃣ https://t.me/tg66yue69/2885

2 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC65 viewsread 7 August 2026

#台北 #新北 #桃園 ⭐ 香奈兒 168-D-47-26歲 啦啦隊兼職 喜歡穿套裝小裙子 長腿加上剛好的D奶 服務有屬於自己的特色~ #北部客評 1️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12392 2️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12404

31 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC85 viewsread 7 August 2026

#台北 #新北 #桃園 ⭐ 汐汐 167-C+-48-20歲 芭蕾舞社團隊長兼職 皮膚白潤滑~ 高顏值~超會帶動 #北部客評 1️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12325 2️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12381

31 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC70 viewsread 7 August 2026

#高雄可約 ⭐ 絲絲 163-F-48-26歲 純天然美乳 五官標準 熱情主動 性格超讚 相處很輕鬆 女友感很強~ #高雄客評 1️⃣ https://t.me/tg66yue69/2721 2️⃣ https://t.me/tg66yue69/2805

30 Jul 2026, 05:25 UTC77 viewsread 7 August 2026

#台中 ⭐ 清清 158-C-45-20歲 超高顏值校花 嬌小精緻可愛 苗條有料 滿分私房妹妹 #台中客評 1️⃣ https://t.me/tg66yue69/2700 2️⃣ https://t.me/tg66yue69/2727 3️⃣ https://t.me/tg66yue69/2792

30 Jul 2026, 05:20 UTC70 viewsread 7 August 2026

#台北 #新北 #桃園 ⭐ 小雪 158-C-45-20歲 小隻馬可愛活潑類型 長髮飄飄 還可以幫雙馬尾 上搖扭動十分歡快 學生妹版榨汁精 #北部客評 1️⃣ https://t.me/tg66yue69/2697 2️⃣ https://t.me/tg66yue69/2782

29 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC64 viewsread 7 August 2026

#台北 #新北 #桃園 ⭐ 蛋塔 166-D-48-26歲 JKF兼職 非常重視身材管理 懂得保養自己 高顏值 極品身材 #北部可約 1️⃣https://t.me/f645shiqi/12344

29 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC57 viewsread 7 August 2026

#台北 #新北 #桃園 ⭐可娜 165-E-48-24歲 長腿搭配美乳 夢中情人般的身材~~ 走在路上都要回頭看的程度~ #北部客評 1️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12359

28 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC62 viewsread 7 August 2026

#高雄可約 ⭐ 歐歐 163-C-46kg-21歲 甜美長相 嬰兒肌超Q 身材苗條 性格活潑~ #高雄客評 1️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12148 2️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12165

25 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC99 viewsread 7 August 2026

#台中 #女大學生 ⭐ 漫漫 163-C-46-21歲 清純漂亮苗條 藝術生兼職 喜歡被調教 俏皮可愛 M屬性會被激發~ #台中客評 1️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12297 2️⃣ https://t.me/f645shiqi/12307

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tw668896. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 12,510 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🥂白月光🇹🇼懶人包-紅牌客評總站” (@tw668896), 513 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tw668896.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.