Posted without readable text
❤1

Channel
@tv_index
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
210subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003873829387 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tv_index |
| Created | 12 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tv_index |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 210 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 209 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 209 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (12 March 2026 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
17 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 76.5% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤1
🚀 上海修车福利群组推荐 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 优质老师的福利群组 🤩静安青柠&柚子老师个人群聊 🔵积分兑换优惠券 👉 点击加入 🦋 徐汇菲奥娜 🔵不定期现金红包和优惠券活动 👉 点击加入 🌸 静安淼淼 🔵不定期发放抽奖福利、优惠券活动 👉 点击加入
❤3
🚀 上海修车福利群组推荐 📢 每天抽奖|竞拍|积分白嫖|精品榜单 轻松薅羊毛,不踩坑! ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ❤️ 美团修车大队 🔵每日多轮优惠卷抽奖 🔵每月两轮白嫖抽奖+出击白嫖抽奖+日常现金红包抽奖 🔵超靠谱精品榜单,出击不踩坑! 老师需要上榜找站长 @meituanzhanzhang 报我名字(TV推荐)有优惠 👉 点击加入 🌪 风子修车 🔵每月666和888 红包抽奖 👉 点击加入 🎨 艺术展 🔵半价工兵,丰富竞拍资源,艺术级体验 👉 点击加入 🏔 魔都光明顶 🔵优质米其林榜单放心出击 🔵半价竞拍超猛,每月发言参与白嫖抽奖 👉 点击加入 🦖上海少年宫交流中心 🔵新群,有很多半价和工兵 👉 点击加入 😐杏花楼 🔵有很多工兵抽奖,参与的人不多,很简单就能捡漏中奖 👉 点击加入 🤤(杭州-上海)91公馆 🔵收录杭州上海精品老师 👉 点击加入 🔤焦点 👉 点击加入 😀狼友小分队 👉 点击加入 ☺️玉蒲…
❤3👍1
🧭TV · 频道总导航 “于喧嚣上海,听风引路。” ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ 🏠 交流大本营|避坑与真实反馈 💬 听风阁 · 聊天主群 📜 核心频道|修车不再迷路 🛒 听风渡 · 优惠捡漏与转让公示 🏮 听风鉴 · 老师卷宗档案库 📝 听风集 · 汇集群友出击报告存档,共建和谐社区 📖 听风 见你 · TV 的个人出击回忆录 🛡 新手保护区|风险地图与防封 ☔️ 避雨亭 · TG 知识与安全指南 🤖 依赖频道的半自动化机器人 💌 全能助理 · 搜老师/查榜单/匿名投稿 (机器人本地运行在电脑上,无法使用时去频道自行搜索) 👮♂️ 认准大号: @tasteV4u 📨 私聊联系: @TVHelpChat_Bot
❤6🫡2🦄1
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @tv_index. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TV·风向标” (@tv_index), 210 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tv_index.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.