Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tunchehra

@tunchehra

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

100subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002827621326
TypeChannel
Username@tunchehra
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/tunchehra

Growth

7510087.57 Aug 2026, 23:59 — 75 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:26 — 100 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 10:48 — 100 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:599 Aug 2026, 10:48
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71–104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:48100no change
8 Aug 2026, 21:26100+25
7 Aug 2026, 23:5975first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
702.3%
avg views ÷ 100 subscribers
Avg views / post
702
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,107
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
65
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13990.3%
👍127.79%
🎉21.30%
❤‍🔥10.649%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC111 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

“Ey Yor, sevdim”, desammi-demasammi? Yolg‘onchi deb quvma, men darbadarni. “Diydor-nasib”, desammi-demasammi? Visol qucharmikin mavhum qadarni? @tunchehra

18👍3❤‍🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,490 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Undan rizo istagan avval Undan rozi bo’lmaydimi?! @tunchehra

15👍6

5 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC506 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Islom insonni tabiiy ravishda kamolotga yetaklaydi! Tongda vahli uyg’onish, istaklarni jilovlash, saxovatli bo’lish - bular zamonaviy dunyoda o’ta yuqori ko’riladigan fazilatlar emasmi?! Bizning qadriyatimizdachi - bu ta’limotimizning boshlang’ich talablari emasmi?! Qanday go’zalki, bizga iymon sharaf, intizom, axloqni boshlang’ich nuqtadanoq taklif etadi va kamolotga aniq o’lchamli yo’l ko’rsatadi. Zamonaviylas

5👍1

5 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC378 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Imkonsiz bo’lsam, nima qilay… Bizda qaysidir muammo bilan kurashish uchun aytaylik 30% imkon bor. Biz ba’zan qolgan 70% imkonsizlikka ko’p e’tibor berib, 30% harakatdan foyda chiqmaydi, deb butunlay yengilgimiz keladi. Lekin bizning sinovimiz mana shu 30% da xolos. Alloh taolo toqatimizdan ortiq narsaga buyurmagan. Bizning vazifamiz noumidlar qatoriga kirib, loqayd bo’lib qolmaslikdan iborat - garchi maqomimiz Ib

6

4 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC332 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#EyNafsim Sendan ketgan narsaning nimasiga achinasan?! U mulk bo’ladimi, rishtalarmi yoki ma’naviy boylikmi farq qilmaydi) Yoki yo’qotilgan narsa ketishidan avval meniki bo’lgan, deb o’ylaganmiding… Alloh berdi, Alloh oldi! Biz vaqtinchalik O’z izni bilan ne’matidan manfaat oluvchilarmiz xolos. Shukr qilishni ham bilmadik. Yetmaganiga omonatni Egasiga qaytarsak nolib ham qo’yamiz… @tunchehra

6

30 Jun 2026, 20:33 UTC270 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Allah is not putting me through something that’s a punishment. It’s always a trial. It’s always a test. And the test is always there for my improvement. Just like in any training. When you’re put through a test. It’s just there to make you stronger. © Nouman Ali Khan @tunchehra

5

28 Jun 2026, 02:40 UTC243 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Suhbatdosh - Alloh Siz o'ta hurmat qiladigan va butun umr bir marta bo'lsa ham suhbatlashishni istaydigan insoningiz bo'lsa kerak-a? U bilan suhbatlasha olmayotganingizga sabablar bir nechadir balki? Lekin Alloh bilan suhbatlashmasligingizga sabab nima?! Qanday gaplashaman deysizmi? Aytiladiki, • Qur'on o'qiganingizda Alloh sizga gapiradi; • Duo qilsangiz siz Unga gapirasiz. Bularni ikkisini jamlasak, bu Alloh b

5

24 Jun 2026, 15:12 UTC229 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Pinhona sirlar “Robbing bilan orangda qandaydir siring bormi?”, deyishdi. Ha, bor. Robbim va faqat men biladigan gunohlarim, armonlarim, ushalmagan orzularim va eng yaqinim ham bilib qolishidan cho’chiydiganim haqiqatlar bor) Lekin Robbim va mening oramizda hech kim bilmaydigan savoblar bormikan yo yo’qmi… buni o’ylash dilimni xira qiladi! @tunchehra

9

22 Jun 2026, 17:06 UTC262 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Namoz va Alloh taolo bilan munosabatimiz Bu shovqinli va chalg’ituvchi olamda ko’pincha eng muhim rishta - Robbimizga bo’lgan aloqamizning holatini bilolmay qolamiz. Menimcha buning mezoni farz namozlarimiz bo’lsa kerak. Agar xushu bilan, o’z vaqtida, haqiqiy talpinish ila ado etsak umid qilamizki Alloh bilan rishtamiz yaxshi. Agar namozlarimizda kamchiliklar bo’lsa, namozni ibodat bo’lgani uchun suyib emas, kun

6👍2

22 Jun 2026, 16:28 UTC188 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Bugungi eshitganim va har kuni ertadan kechgacha takror-takror eshitishga tayyor bo’ladiganim jumla: “Kimning butun dard-u xayoli oxirat bo’lsa, Alloh taolo dunyoviy muammolariga kifoya qiladi. Kimning butun dard-u xayoli dunyo bo’lsa, Alloh taolo u bandaning qaysi vodiyda vafot etganiga ham qiziqmaydi hatto…” @tunchera

11

7 Jun 2026, 10:14 UTC236 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#mulohaza Bir tanishimning gapi hech qachon esimdan chiqmaydi. “Islomda taqiqlangan narsalar kam. Lekin bizning atrofimizda unday narsalar ko’p. Islom qiyin bo’lgani uchun emas, bizning atrofimizda taqiqlangan narsalar ko’payib ketgani uchun o’zimizni siquvdadek his qilamiz.” Islomni o’zimizga moslashtirib olishga emas, Islomga moslashishga intilishimiz bu holatda muammoni yechar balki… @tunchehra

8

5 Jun 2026, 06:08 UTC283 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Biz xatokor bo’lsak, Alloh Rahmondir. Adashganlar yo’li, Hadiy tomondir. Shafiy lutf aylasa, jonlar omondir. Bizga Alloh kifoya, bitsin mahzunlik. Yana qaysi ismin vasf aylay, bilmam. Aziym, Kabiyr, desak, kichrayar olam. G’affor, Rahiym, desak, ketar afsus ham. Bizga Alloh kifoya, bitsin mahzunlik. Allohning hamdini bitolmas shoir. Qalamlar ojizdir, Robbimiz Qodir. Lek yod etsak ismin, qurshaydi xayr. Bizga Alloh

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tunchehra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 114,060 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tunchehra” (@tunchehra), 100 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tunchehra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.