Channel
@tulpa_conf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
456subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002651689841 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tulpa_conf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tulpa_conf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 456 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 455 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 455 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 March 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 269 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
89 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5397611776000946952 | 21 | 23.6% | |
| custom 5427381727632848036 | 21 | 23.6% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 20.2% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 12.4% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 11.2% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 8.99% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🧪 🤩 🔹ꫀׄ с кꫀִׄⲙִׄ ꪮׄбмꫀׄняִтсяя нɸִт 🚫 🤩🖤🍼 или ж𝐞 х𝐨ч𝐞шь н𝐚𝐨б𝐨℘𝐨т 𝐞го к𝐲п𝐮ть или 🍼🍼 📼📼 🍼п℘𝐨д𝐚ть 🍼 🍼 🍼 а мꪮж︩︪ꫀִׄт быִть 🤩🤩 🤩пр𝐨ст𝐨 𝐮нт𝐞р𝐞су𝐞т нфт 🤩 сф𝐞р𝐚 🤩 🍼🎁 🤩🌟𝖾𝗅𝖼𝗈𝗆e 𝗍𝗈 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩𝗇𝖿𝗍 𝗄𝗂𝗍 𝖼𝖿 💎 здесь вы можете 🎁🤩🤩🤩🤍айти 🤩все что связано с нфт 🤩 🪽 ртшить этот пост
🤬 2026 HATE CONFESSION – Я Н3Н48ИЖУ 2026!!!!! – 4 с0 мн0й прои3ошл4 т4к4я ситу4ция в 2026... – 2026 с4мый уж4сный год! ТОЖЕ НЕНАВИДИШЬ 2026 ГОД?? ТОГДА ТЕБЕ К НАМ! вп пост (0+) навигация ссылка на тгк ДН1: Н3ТУ🤩🤩🤩
banner cr @Kltalin 😻🔤=🤩 😊😊😊😊😊 ☕️ ; ; 🌟.🤩✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️🤩🌟 🤩ᴀнᴀᴧ ᴨᴏ иᴦᴩᴇ Dandy's world! 🎀 вы вышли в лᴇс, чтоҕы нᴇмного ᴘᴀзҕᴀвить ᴘʏтинʏ своих днᴇй. нᴇжныᴇ лᴇсныᴇ зᴀпᴀхи всᴇгдᴀ вᴀс ʏспокᴀивᴀли, мᴀнили, зᴀстᴀвляя ʏглʏҕляться всᴇ дᴀльшᴇ в чᴀщʏ. ᴘᴀздвигᴀя очᴇᴘᴇдной кʏсточᴇк, вᴀм в глᴀзᴀ ҕᴘосился стᴘᴀнный ҕᴀᴘᴀшᴇк. он нᴇ выглядᴇл злым или оҕᴇспокоᴇнным, совсᴇм нᴀоҕоᴘот - нᴇоҕъяснимо ʏмиᴘотвоᴘᴇнным, с искᴘившᴇйся ʏлыҕк…
ㅤ🤩 ֵ 🎶 ׄ😻 ֺ😀𝑖𝑔𝒉𝓽𝑐𝖔𝒓𝑑 𝒅𝓮 ׅ𓈒 ⏝︶ 🤩 𝑐𝑓𝑑𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑦 ִ 😻 ׁ 𓈒 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗒𝗈𝗎 ! ! 🎁 ◞ 🍭 ៸៸ интересуешься ׁ милыми🤩 ㅤִั ⏝ ׅ найткордами из 🤩 ♡ ...🤩 𓏺 𓏺 ᤺ 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒋𝒆𝒄𝒕 𝒔𝒆𝒌𝒂𝒊 ֵ 😻 ݃ 🥹
🐾 hello & welcome to . . . 🤩🤩 🔤OMMISIONS 💢💢💢🔤ONFESSIONS 📼📼 – 🔤олго искали, у кого можно заказать коммишку, но так и не нашли? – 🔤е можете найти покупателей? – 🔤отите попрактиковаться и бесплатно нарисовать ос пары человек? 💢💢💢 😻 t.me/commscf 💢💢❗️navigation && mp (100+)
✨у нас набор в админы Я нарисовал/а арт с альт!ешкой но мне некому его показать(( Альт ё такой сас>_< почему по нему все еще нету кф?Т-Т Я ПОЛКЛОНЯЮСЬ АЛЬТ ЁШКЕ🙏🙏🙏 🎁 это больше не проблема! я приглошаю вас в ❤️❤️❤️🤩🤩 🫀🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🅰️ 🅰️ в этой прекрасной, чудесной, замечатальной, неповторимой конфе ты сможешь поделиться своим творчеством по альт ёшке(и всеми кто связан с его вселенной…
Я боюсь что в тульпу влюблюсь и не захочу реального партнера иметь… ＞＜ ﹒ ❛❛ #ᴛᥱӣκ ﹒ ➜ @tulpacf_bot
💯4custom 54273817276328480364🤔2
Всем привет, может типичный вопрос и вам будет лень отвечать но накиньте хотя бы пару слов, мне важно это Каким людям точно не стоит заводить тульпу? И второй вопрос: И можно ли мне завести тульпу? - я 4 года без друзей в ирл и мне одиноко и скучно одному, я хочу создать тульпу просто чтоб она была, я хочу с ней дружить, может полюблю, я не создаю ее для каких то целей, это просто будет мой воображаемый друг с кото…
custom 53976117760009469526💯2
Всем привет, хотел задать вопрос. Вот у меня например есть анкета тульпы, я могу форсить (правильно назвал?) то как она выглядит, трогать ее и тд…и вот к меня например раздел его детсва, его привычек - как это форсить и как это все перенесется на него тупо с бумажки? Или может это уже входит в него, осталось только форсить и форсить чтоб он уже появился со всем этим…просто не понимаю как с листика и букв такие вещи н…
❤2💯2
Давно нахожусь с собой наедине, так и с ума сойти несложно. Больно скучно бывает :) Я тульпа, нередко фрончу и бываю на связи, фиктив из совсем небольшой системы, если это важно. Мой фактический возраст близится к двум годам, как и возраст моей системы. Буду рад найти продолжительное общение, будь вы тульпой, альтером, хостом или синглетом, не принципиально. Отмечайтесь под постом ＞＜ ﹒ ❛❛ #ᴛᥱӣκ ﹒ ➜ @tulpac…
❤3
Приве, дайте пж способов как ещё можно усилить чувство присутствия тульпы, может аффирмации (я читал что они могут помочь) ^_^ ＞＜ ﹒ ❛❛ #ᴛᥱӣκ ﹒ ➜ @tulpacf_bot
custom 53976117760009469525💯1
пр, как форсить если я нахожусь в депрессии. типо, это вообще возможно (я про активный форс) или надо сначала свое состояние нормализовать, кто знает? ＞＜ ﹒ ❛❛ #ᴛᥱӣκ ﹒ ➜ @tulpacf_bot
custom 54273817276328480366
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tulpa_conf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 629,293 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tulpa_conf named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𑣲 . тʏльпᴀ кɸ 𖥔 ݁˖” (@tulpa_conf), 456 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tulpa_conf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.