Channel
@tuideir
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
856subscribers
+355 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003788579386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tuideir |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tuideir |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 856 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 862 | +11 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 851 | +65 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 786 | +203 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 583 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 580 | +80 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 500 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 501 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
319 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5296382115548539387 | 86 | 27.0% | |
| custom 5296301340098600504 | 85 | 26.6% | |
| custom 5296775096466183244 | 75 | 23.5% | |
| custom 5296673937101459706 | 45 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5296722611965827201 | 28 | 8.78% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بیشتر حس می‌کنم شاید مربوط به ولاگی چیزی باشه آخه توی کانسپت‌ها که همچین استایلی ندارن ولی در عوض این استایل سوهی رو قبلا توی آپدیت‌های ۲۷ جولای دیده بودیم که به‌نظر نمی‌اومد مربوط به موزیک‌ویدیو باشه و تقریبا شبیه به گردش بود.
custom 52963013400986005046custom 52963821155485393873custom 52966739371014597063
ا. ᨳଓ — یک نفر از فیلم‌برداری تواید توی ایسلند که مربوط به دو الی سه هفته پیش یک عکس منتشر کرده.
custom 52963821155485393877custom 52963013400986005042custom 52966739371014597062custom 52967226119658272012
Sticker, posted without a caption
از دیروز باز کلی به تواید سر اینکه از ai برای اسکجول کلندر استفاده کردن هیت دادن خوشحالم که دهنشون بسته شد با دیدن استوری‌های خانومی.
custom 529677509646618324419custom 52967226119658272014custom 52963821155485393873custom 52966739371014597063
اون قبل از تواید با آرتیست‌های زیادی از جمله لسرافیم، اسپا، جنی، سونتین، میو، بیلی و ... و برندهایی مثل سامسونگ همکاری داشته.
custom 529630134009860050416custom 52963821155485393873custom 52966739371014597063custom 52967226119658272013
ا. ᨳଓ — یه‌سول لی، طراح سه‌بعدی که روی اسکجول کلندر دبیوی تواید کار کرده، پست‌های مربوط بهش رو اد استوری کرده.
custom 529638211554853938715custom 52963013400986005043custom 52966739371014597063custom 52967226119658272013
ا. ᨳଓ — تاریخ تولد و سن اعضای تواید : 🌸 « سوهی | ۱۱ اکتبر ۲۰۰۶ | ۱۹ ساله. » ✨ « سویون | ۴ مارس ۲۰۰۸ | ۱۸ ساله. » 🩷 « النا | ۱۱ آوریل ۲۰۰۸ | ۱۸ ساله. » 🐱 « جیا | ۲۲ آگوست ۲۰۰۸ | ۱۷ ساله. » 🎵 « ساکی | ۹ اکتبر ۲۰۱۰ | ۱۵ ساله. » 💢 « سه‌آ | ۴ ژانویه ۲۰۱۱ | ۱۵ ساله. » 😄 « یی‌هانی | ۷ ژانویه ۲۰۱۱ | ۱۵ ساله. »
custom 529630134009860050427custom 52966739371014597064custom 52963821155485393873custom 52967750964661832443
behind the scenes #TUIDE
custom 529667393710145970619custom 52963821155485393876custom 52963013400986005043custom 52967750964661832443
بی‌زحمت از اینجا چک کنید و ریکت بدید.
custom 529677509646618324410custom 52963821155485393874custom 52966739371014597062custom 52963013400986005041
در آخر امیدوارم این ثرد و پلی‌لیست‌ها تونسته باشن دیدگاهتون رو نسبت به این موضوع روشن‌تر کنن. هدفم از نوشتن این ثرد، بحث یا حمله به هیچ گروه یا فندومی نبود و مشکلی هم با فندوم نیوجینز ندارم. این توضیحات صرفا در پاسخ به افرادیه که فقط به خاطر شباهت در ژانر، آهنگ‌ها رو کپی می‌دونن در حالی که شباهت در ژانر، به‌تنهایی معیار کپی‌برداری نیست. امیدوارم از حرف‌هام برداشت اشتباهی نشه و ممنونم که وقت گذاشتید و تا آخر مطالعه کر…
custom 529677509646618324415custom 52967226119658272014custom 52966739371014597063custom 52963013400986005042
آیا اگر تواید هم از یوکِی‌گاراژ استفاده کنن یعنی از نیوجینز کپی کردن؟ نه، صرفا استفاده از یک ژانر موسیقی به معنی کپی‌برداری نیست. همون‌طور که دو گروه می‌تونن آهنگ راک، هیپ‌هاپ یا آراندبی منتشر کنن بدون اینکه یکی از اون یکی کپی کرده باشه، چندین گروه هم می‌تونن از یوکِی‌گاراژ الهام بگیرن. اگر توی آهنگ‌های تواید از یوکِی‌گاراژ استفاده شده باشه، در حال استفاده از یه ژانر قدیمی و شناخته‌شده هستن نه کپی از کسی.
custom 529677509646618324416custom 52963821155485393874custom 52967226119658272014custom 52963013400986005042
من دیدم که یک نفر در ریپلای به کوت من که راجب یوکِی‌گاراژ گفته بودم، گفته بود که این ژانر بعد از دبیوی نیوجینز به کی‌پاپ وارد شده پس این پلی‌لیست رو آماده کردم که نشون بدم نیوجینز هیچ نقشی توی شروع این ژانر و ترند کردنش توی کی‌پاپ نداشتن.
custom 529630134009860050416custom 52967226119658272014custom 52963821155485393873custom 52967750964661832442
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tuideir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ TUIDE 𝗓︎𝔬𝗇︎𝖾 | تواید” (@tuideir), 856 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tuideir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.