nicht mit uns
🤬11👏5🖕1😁1

Channel
@tuffi_truther
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
144subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002066799554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tuffi_truther |
| Description | Bei uns gibt es NEUTRALITÄT, TRANSPARENZ, FAKTEN - hier denken wir noch selber Teilt diesen Kanal aber passt auf euch auf, noch haben wir keine kritische Masse Kontakt: [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 23 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tuffi_truther |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 144 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 144 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 23 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
282 reactions across 16 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 72 | 25.5% | |
| 🕊 | 46 | 16.3% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 8.16% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 6.74% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 6.03% | |
| 🤯 | 15 | 5.32% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 4.96% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 4.26% | |
| 🫡 | 10 | 3.55% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 1.77% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.77% | |
| 🗿 | 5 | 1.77% | |
| 🙊 | 5 | 1.77% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 1.42% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.06% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.06% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.709% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.709% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.709% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.709% | |
| 12 further kinds | 16 | 5.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2024 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
nicht mit uns
🤬11👏5🖕1😁1
https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/panorama/tiere/id_101267230/wal-timmy-tot-geschichte-der-retter-bricht-jetzt-zusammen.html Während ein suizidaler Wal wochenlang das Nachrichtengeschehen dominiert, bleiben auch knapp 76 Jahre nach dem Drama von Wuppertal grundliegende Fragen ungeklärt. Welche Bedeutung hat das Leben eines Säugetiers, wenn das Leid anderer Säugetiere keine Beachtung findet? Uns kann niemand verk…
🤬11😱5👀3
Dieses Sharepic fanden wir in unserem digitalen Briefkasten: [email protected] Danke für die Hilfe, nur gemeinsam schaffen wir das 🤝 Teilt es in euren sozialen Netzwerken und leistet euren Beitrag für Wahrheit und Gerechtigkeit ❗ Für Hoffnung ❗ Für Tuffi ‼️ #elefantenbrechenkeinestahlstreben
👏7🕊7👍1💯1
#boykottHochwaldMilcheG
🤬11❤2😭2👍1🕊1
❌75 JAHRE TUFFI❌ Heute vor 75 Jahren, am 21. Juli 1950, fand der Vorfall statt, der uns alle nicht mehr loslässt. Tuffi, die blutjunge Elefantendame 🐘, wurde in den Waggon der Eshä 🚟 gepfercht und ist schließlich aus diesem gesprungen? gefallen? gestoßen worden⁉️ Was wir wissen ist, dass kein Elefant freiwillig in eine Eshä einsteigt❗ Dass kein Elefant freiwillig aus mehreren Metern Höhe in flaches Wasser springt❗ D…
🫡10❤8❤🔥4💯2🔥2🕊2🙏2
📢 Unterstützt keine Molkereihersteller die aus Tuffis "Schicksal" Profit schlagen 📢 #boykottHochwaldMilcheG
🕊12🔥5👏4🍓3❤2💯1😁1😡1
Voice message, posted without a caption
🕊12🙊4👍1
Remember 21.07.51 Vor 73 Jahren ereignete sich eines den prägendsten Ereignisse der zweiten Hälfte des 20 Jahrhunderts. Bis heute besteht weitreichende Unklarheit. 🕵️ Eine junge Elefanten Kuh, die in eine Eshä steigt, die Stahlstreben des Waggons bricht und das noch überleben soll⁉️ Wir ruhen nicht eher, bis der Fall Tuffi geklärt ist❗️ Bis alle Akten offen liegen❗️ Bis alle Verantwortlichen zur Rechenschaft gezog…
🕊12💔2😢2🙊1
Faktencheck 🔎 Der Molkerei-Riese "TUFFI" verbreitet systematisch Lügen in ALLER ÖFFENTLICHKEIT. Die Bahn hängt, sie schwebt nicht! der "Sturz" geschah über die Seitenwand, nicht das Fenster!! Die Anwesenden hatten alle ein Interesse an dieser Sensation und propagierten das MÄRCHEN vom selbstverschuldeten Unfall ❗ Tuffi war bei dieser Fahrt die einzige unschuldige in dieser EsHä. Währendessen macht "Hochwald Milch eG"…
🤬17🤯4🤡2🤮2⚡1👍1😱1
Wir stehen hinter 1UP. Aber bitte achtet auf euer Wording. Das Nahverkersmittel ist eine einschienige Hängebahn (EsHä)! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg5OrytF_a0
👏6🔥4🤝2🥰2
Wir begrüßen alle neuen Wahrheitsfinder, die sich uns angeschlossen haben. ✊ Wir werden weitermachen, egal welche Steine uns in den Weg gelegt werden. ❗️ Einzeln können sie uns verhaften, unsere Accounts sperren, die Freundschaft kündigen "weil es immer nur ein Thema gibt". Sie können sich sogar scheiden lassen, weil wir "die Spinnerei mehr lieben würden als sie". Aber was sie nicht können, ist uns aufhalten. Die Wa…
❤🔥8🤯5❤3🔥3
UNS ERREICHEN BRISANTE NEUIGKEITEN Roland K. (Name von uns geändert) teilte mit uns Insider Information. Es geht um ingineurstechnische Gutachten 👷 zur Belastbarkeit von Leichtbaukabinen Ein- und Mehrschieniger Hängebahnen 🚟 durch große Landsäugetiere. Der Verdacht liegt nahe, dass diese Gutachten bewusst unter Verschluss gehalten wurden 🤬 Elefanten 🐘 brechen keine Kabinen-Leichtbauwände Ein- und Mehrschieniger Hä…
😱10🐳1💩1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tuffi_truther. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 806,893 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tuffi | Wahrheit | Fakten” (@tuffi_truther), 144 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tuffi_truther.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.