Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

тайгá

@ttaiqa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

432subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001671501432
TypeChannel
Username@ttaiqa
Created14 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ttaiqa

Growth

4327 Aug 2026, 04:01 — 432 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:07 — 432 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:017 Aug 2026, 20:07
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 431–433 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 20:07432no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:01432first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.7%
avg views ÷ 432 subscribers
Avg views / post
206
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held18 (29 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,266
Reactions total234
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

368 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54071006386580752597219.6%
custom 54159576987410193746617.9%
custom 54318337447030024194813.0%
4612.5%
🍓359.51%
custom 5413540413837450358287.61%
custom 5413740718227202796246.52%
custom 5408856799245798425164.35%
💋123.26%
custom 541785311934838181171.90%
❤‍🔥61.63%
💘61.63%
🔥10.272%
🤡10.272%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 368reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ttaiqa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC90 views31 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

в процессе пока что😍

19💘5🍓4custom 54088567992457984251custom 54135404138374503581custom 54137407182272027961

2 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC137 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

че думаете, делать гавр гуру?

6custom 54159576987410193746custom 54071006386580752595custom 54318337447030024193🍓1custom 54088567992457984251custom 54137407182272027961custom 54178531193483818111

30 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC155 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54159576987410193744🍓2custom 54071006386580752592custom 541354041383745035821custom 54088567992457984251custom 54137407182272027961custom 54318337447030024191

30 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC144 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54318337447030024193🍓1custom 54071006386580752591custom 54088567992457984251custom 54135404138374503581custom 54137407182272027961custom 54159576987410193741

25 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC192 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @slackeryurPhoto

И таааак....🪼🪼🪼🪼🪼🪼🪼 Фоточки тут 🪼 https://disk.yandex.ru/d/R8gFYBYx_JNrHA 🪼 Долго ждали? Ну ладно вам, ладно... Хочу высказать огромное спасибо всем выступающим, это было эффектно, это было мощно, это было замечательно, настолько, что моя аппаратура перегрелась от вас прекрасных! Очень жаль, что много пришлось упустить, надеюсь в дальнейшем буду снова радовать вас фотографиями больше Личная просьба к использован

custom 54071006386580752593custom 541595769874101937421🍓1🤡1custom 54088567992457984251custom 54135404138374503581custom 54137407182272027961

23 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC190 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

а закат был ал.. #phott

custom 540710063865807525918custom 541595769874101937474💋2custom 54088567992457984252custom 54137407182272027962custom 54178531193483818112❤‍🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 06:48 UTC245 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54318337447030024198custom 54071006386580752595custom 54159576987410193745🍓21custom 54088567992457984251custom 54135404138374503581custom 54137407182272027961

19 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC227 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54318337447030024197custom 54071006386580752594🍓3custom 54088567992457984251custom 54135404138374503581custom 54137407182272027961

19 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC220 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда я подсяду на минераллы, в частности на лабрадор – никому об этом не скажу но знаки будут

custom 54159576987410193746🍓3custom 54071006386580752592custom 54088567992457984251custom 54135404138374503581custom 54137407182272027961custom 54178531193483818111

18 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC467 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤎 Если ты не видишь в сундуке TNT – это не значит, что я его украл🌟 Ладно.. Этот я украл ❤ 🌟❤️ 🌟❤️ 🌟❤️ 🌟❤️ #ttcos: @ttaiqa

custom 541354041383745035812custom 54071006386580752598custom 54318337447030024197custom 54159576987410193744custom 54137407182272027963🍓2custom 54088567992457984251custom 54178531193483818111

18 Jul 2026, 07:48 UTC199 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ой что я щас выложуу легенду майнкрафтаа

🍓4custom 54071006386580752592custom 54159576987410193742custom 54318337447030024191

14 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC255 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 #aftg Нил Джостен #ttcos : @ttaiqa

custom 54318337447030024197custom 54071006386580752595custom 54159576987410193745🍓2custom 54088567992457984251custom 54135404138374503581custom 54137407182272027961

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ttaiqa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 917,070 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“тайгá” (@ttaiqa), 432 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ttaiqa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.