Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

винтажный мужчина ⋇⋆⋆⋇ Церено

@tsereno_ch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

247subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001793044752
TypeChannel
Username@tsereno_ch
Descriptionздесь живёт и творит тревожный сычик (но это не точно)
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/tsereno_ch

Growth

2476 Aug 2026, 22:47 — 247 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:30 — 247 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:477 Aug 2026, 02:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 246–248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:30247no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:47247first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 13 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.8%
avg views ÷ 247 subscribers
Avg views / post
101
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
30.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held13 (13 January 202629 July 2026)
Views total302
Reactions total91
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,370
Videos
116
Links
233

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

494 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18236.8%
custom 59583871187607916306012.1%
custom 6042091886716391483479.51%
❤‍🔥469.31%
custom 6041743779617050626408.10%
custom 5969831475732811834326.48%
🐳275.47%
🔥244.86%
🍓214.25%
💋153.04%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tsereno_ch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 January 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC63 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @miksvmiksvVideo

NU:CARNIVAL | STAGE 🪻🤩🪻 И наконец видео нашего следовательско-карнивального выступления! 😳Эдмонд 🤭Куя 🌟Рей 😴Квинси 💸Астер 🥺Гару 🌟Данте 🌟Блейд 😳Морвей 😋Эйден Vid https://t.me/hukta_video_festivals

15🐳6custom 60420918867163914835custom 59698314757328118343🔥1

Signed тревожный сырок

25 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC129 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

16custom 596983147573281183410custom 60420918867163914838🐳3

Signed тревожный сырок

25 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC110 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @miksvmiksvPhoto

🤍NU: CARNIVAL🤍 Завтра (уже сегодня) проводим финальную черту проекта по карнивалу и выступаем на Мэджике во втором блоке Увидимся!❤️❤️❤️ 😳Эдмонд 🤭Куя 🌟Рей 😴Квинси 💸Астер 🥺Гару 🌟Данте 🌟Блейд 😳Морвей 😋Эйден Ph Sora

11custom 59698314757328118346🔥5🐳1custom 60420918867163914831

Signed тревожный сырок

25 May 2026, 15:01 UTC258 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

на выходных снимали глупи рыбу в парашюте по идее Ани Вишни🐠 учитывая жару, обилие вентиляторов было самое то🤩 бэки сняты лапками @vanxxxo 😍

19custom 596983147573281183411custom 59583871187607916307custom 60417437796170506263🍓2🐳2custom 60420918867163914832

Signed сычик

3 May 2026, 09:08 UTC365 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Через пару часов планирую нагрянуть на КОНстанту в Рафаэле 🐠 Буду рада пересечься 〰️ ph: WOLFDEN #rafayel #cosplay #lads #love_and_deepspace #abysswalker

custom 60417437796170506261712custom 60420918867163914837🔥2🐳1custom 59698314757328118341

Signed сычик

3 May 2026, 08:01 UTC253 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @miksvmiksvPhoto

Eiden & Blade | NU: CARNIVAL 🌟🌟🌟 Mission complete. Target shows no signs of life Eiden MIKSV Blade tsereno Ph Sora

custom 60420918867163914831210❤‍🔥7🐳2custom 59698314757328118341custom 60417437796170506261

Signed тревожный сырок

29 Apr 2026, 19:46 UTC405 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🅰️🅰️ ❤️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ Посмотрите, какие красавцы❤️ и мои любимые сапожки тоже в кадре хорошо смотрятся Эйден 😈 Блэйд 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 Ph: Сора #nu_carnival #blade #cosplay

🍓19🔥16💋123custom 59583871187607916302custom 60417437796170506262custom 60420918867163914832🐳1

Signed сычик

12 Apr 2026, 18:07 UTC267 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bryksya_cosPhoto

Собрала просто dream team 🥰 Самые красивые и самые лучшие футболисты 🥹 🌴🍹 В пляжном эпизоде: — Бачира — Чигири — Наги — Айку — Сендо — Исаги — Несс — Рео — Кайзер — Рин — Шидо — Саэ ☀☀☀ Люблю просто безумно 💔

15❤‍🔥10custom 59583871187607916308🐳3

Signed тревожный сырок

25 Mar 2026, 06:38 UTC≈1,690 views98 reactions30 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🧠 Сегодня мне исполнилось целых 1️⃣1️⃣ лет!🐈 Самой не верится🥰 и по такому приятному поводу в пост приложила фоточки, которые ещё не выкладывала, но на которые хочу потом сделать хорошо оформленные посты. А пока что празднуем🥰🥰🥰 Передаю привет тем, у кого телеграм работает, и они увидят этот пост😋

37❤‍🔥27custom 595838711876079163022custom 60420918867163914834💋3custom 60417437796170506263🐳2

Signed сычик

7 Feb 2026, 11:04 UTC481 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ворону выпустили погулять на Любфесте с босс мэном 📼

28custom 595838711876079163014custom 604174377961705062614custom 60420918867163914836🐳3❤‍🔥2

13 Jan 2026, 09:15 UTC597 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну и лучше поздно, чем никогда, итоги прошлого года :з косплей, аниме, творчество 👌

9custom 59583871187607916307🐳2

Signed сычик

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @tsereno_ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 495,572 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“винтажный мужчина ⋇⋆⋆⋇ Церено” (@tsereno_ch), 247 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tsereno_ch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.