Channel
@tryhardscrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
193subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003964179524 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tryhardscrypto |
| Description | Entrepreneur MarkertingWeb3 Specialist, @Cryptodevbsctg Real channel no paid subscribers We print together |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tryhardscrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 193 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 193 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 192 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,157 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Solid reversal! Held well over night with a very experienced team behind this project. Rewards are paying cashcat to hold. I expected a great run up today. 0xAe73ff682fb69be5dfBBC59C9CC4a8d4289d2c42 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4f6347dec75cf13ffb8614040f1b7c0dbafdf8f50b2f515f7cc0f8cd9197badb
Signed ⚡Synergy⚡ OG
0x8cb95acd0E37C30970D8a79D165e54bC378f27E2 Let's cook
Signed ⚡Synergy⚡ OG
Gamble Believe in something 0x488435daad3ec0014ae274db1eebae6d338d8e18
Signed ⚡Synergy⚡ OG
Lowcap gamble 0x9085864ad952Dbe650871396CBfEdF783F32A82B
Signed ⚡Synergy⚡ OG
0x36f820acebc9e6093826632702d0f5065de352cc App on apple and adroid https://t.me/MovieGentHood
Signed Shiba Army Never Dm first
Low cap utility play https://robscan.ai.studio/ 0x17e7F51A5a2389d92d1114A1759ff26c613Cb291
Signed ⚡Synergy⚡ OG
Low cap 5k Few people really enjoy the game 0xcf3e5abc9fde7e78a6f72e4884d66cebf7f8a641
Signed ⚡Synergy⚡ OG
Snat doing extremely well Take my advice Size in Easy 10x but you need to hold! 0x02C83495bb67b325F9694dD9BfACD51c8218BDc9
🥰1
Signed ⚡Synergy⚡ OG
Word getting out shib deployer funded this launch. Call near ath but it's gonna print. 0xe15db7c8547a0add11eb26a700246cca08aefce5
Signed ⚡Synergy⚡ OG
Gamble here previous did 300k 0x889c19fed70bfc6021a6ebccf50a1fadb363e3b6
Signed ⚡Synergy⚡ OG
Good things take time and ngu been working hard. Looking to have this update live tomorrow. Front run the news. 0x6f90980ddbfe1e58ad1321104e299f291a84297b
Signed ⚡Synergy⚡ OG
Gamble for the day Low cap 8k 0x4699902aEF95196e4Bceb6472EB131A2c18206fA
Signed ⚡Synergy⚡ OG
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tryhardscrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Try Hards” (@tryhardscrypto), 193 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tryhardscrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.