Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trust Wallet Admin Scammer

Channel

Trust Wallet Admin Scammer

@trustwalletscamm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

176subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002462574985
TypeChannel
Username@trustwalletscamm
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 1 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/trustwalletscamm

Growth

1761781777 August 2026 — 178 subscribers8 August 2026 — 178 subscribers14 August 2026 — 177 subscribers22 August 2026 — 176 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 176–178 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 19:12176-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:44177-1
8 Aug 2026, 13:30178no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:06178first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 1 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

159 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3924.5%
🔥2314.5%
2213.8%
🤩1911.9%
🥰1710.7%
🎉159.43%
👏159.43%
🐳42.52%
🤡21.26%
💯10.629%
😁10.629%
🤯10.629%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2025 to 12 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Mar 2025, 15:08 UTC≈3,880 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лука Киргиз обвинил Trust Wallet в скаме, но сам мог оказаться жертвой мошенников Лука Киргиз и объединившаяся с ним команда Tentum обвинили в скаме на несколько тысяч долларов члена команды Trust Wallet по имени Анастасия, после чего снесли ей аккаунт. Однако на самом деле они могли общаться с мошенниками, которым удалось увести 5500 долларов. Команда планировала провести листинг токенов USD.T Tentum и USDC Classi

4

7 Mar 2025, 02:02 UTC≈3,740 views125 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

👤 📷lukakg0833 Trust wallet https://t.me/trustwallet_ua https://t.me/trustwallet Любая Война заканчивается переговорами Так зачем вам тянуть ? С каждым днем теряя репутации Все больше и больше !!! Все Мы Люди И кони те спотыкаются у них 4 ноги Что говорить о нас двух ногих Верните деньги Залистите монету Завершите работу до логического конца И все это закончится Сейчас все больше и больше Крупных каналов будут под

👍22🔥20🤩19🥰1716🎉15👏15🐳1

4 Mar 2025, 22:34 UTC≈3,570 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Меня удивляет этот мир 🫣 После такого вагона и маленькой тележки обоснования и пруфов Есть люди кто все еще сомневаются Что это был не фейк аккаунт Вот для всех таких "одаренных" Вот простой способ проверки линка Берем скрин и с помощью смарт фона копируем линк прям с фото и не когда не промахнетесь Это Я показываю на видео ПОЛЬЗУЙТЕСЬ 🤗 Так же обоснование На видео что @nedjunta Неджунта старая интриганка !!! 1 )е

👍31🐳1🔥1

3 Mar 2025, 08:56 UTC≈3,190 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Каждый день все глубже и глубже Trusr wallet закапывается В ЕДИНСТВЕ СИЛА 💪 За Правду за Правое Дело до Конца https://t.me/trustwalletscamm

👍4🤡1😁1

2 Mar 2025, 15:57 UTC≈1,960 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо что не прошли мимо https://t.me/+PsdVsb9OQOowYjdi https://t.me/c/2095423048/1331 В Единстве Наша Сила 💪 За ПРАВДУ За ПРАВОЕ ДЕЛО ДО КОНЦА

👍3🐳1🔥1

2 Mar 2025, 13:35 UTC≈1,540 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо что не прошли мимо В ЕДИНСТВЕ НАША СИЛА 💪 За ПРАВДУ За ПРАВОЕ ДЕЛО ДО КОНЦА !!! https://www.binance.com/en/square/profile/marsian/

👍5🐳1🔥1

2 Mar 2025, 13:09 UTC≈2,230 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Trust wallet https://t.me/trustwallet_ua https://t.me/trustwallet Любая Война заканчивается переговорами Так зачем вам тянуть ? С каждым днем теряя репутации Все больше и больше !!! Все Мы Люди И кони те спотыкаются у них 4 ноги Что говорить о нас двух ногих Верните деньги Залистите монету Завершите работу до логического конца И все это закончится Сейчас все больше и больше Крупных каналов будут подхватывать и все

1🤡1

2 Mar 2025, 13:07 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 8 August 2026

Trust wallet Любая Война заканчивается переговорами Так зачем вам тянуть ? С каждым днем теряя репутации Все больше и больше !!! Все Мы Люди И кони те спотыкаются у них 4 ноги Что говорить о нас двух ногих Верните деньги Залистите монету Завершите работу до логического конца И все это закончится Сейчас все больше и больше Крупных каналов будут подхватывать и все глубже будет закапываться Ваша репутация Trust wallet

1 Mar 2025, 18:27 UTC≈1,950 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Для тех кто твердо лобый И говорит что где доказательства что она имеет отношения к Trust wallet ? https://t.me/trustwalletscamm

👍2💯1🤯1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @trustwalletscamm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 627,611 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trust Wallet Admin Scammer” (@trustwalletscamm), 176 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trustwalletscamm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.