Channel
@trustryeji
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
437subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002565887541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trustryeji |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trustryeji |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 437 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 437 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (4 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,814 |
| Reactions total | 331 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
331 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5228845129208438288 | 127 | 38.4% | |
| custom 5082682203805058855 | 58 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5086839581823731622 | 49 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5443126399135130599 | 34 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5248991115691981507 | 32 | 9.67% | |
| custom 5443070817963352996 | 21 | 6.34% | |
| custom 5348269452242736561 | 10 | 3.02% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
That's like.... Our mega channels Girls : babymonster yeji & ryujin ( itzy ) dodree kiss of life more vision girl group Boys : KickFlip boynextdoor Kim Taehyung ( BTS) seonghwa ( ateez ) boynextdoor yeonjun & beomgyu ( txt ) Other : Ищу сп|друзей
custom 52288451292084382882
It’z hwang in your #yeinst .ᐟ.ᐟ kitty sent you 𓏲 ๋࣭ ࣪ ˖ 🐺Йеджи в инсте Roger Vivier🤩 ⤷ ゛@trustryeji ˎˊ˗
custom 54430708179633529968custom 50826822038050588554custom 52288451292084382884custom 53482694522427365613
а какая ваша любимая сольная песня Йеджи?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 524899111569198150710custom 50826822038050588554custom 52288451292084382883
It’z hwang in your #fans .ᐟ.ᐟ kitty sent you 𓏲 ๋࣭ ࣪ ˖ 🐺Йеджи сказала,что ее любимая сольная песня — COMH: 🐈⬛:Во время фансайна одна MIDZY спросила меня, какая из моих сольных песен моя любимая 🐈⬛:Честно говоря, действительно очень сложно выбрать всего одну. Каждая сольная песня так дорога мне, они все словно мои собственные дети, так что я правда не могу выбрать. 🐈⬛:Но если бы пришлось выбрать ту, что …
custom 522884512920843828816custom 50826822038050588555custom 54431263991351305995custom 50868395818237316221
It’z hwang in your #fans.ᐟ.ᐟ kitty sent you 𓏲 ๋࣭ ࣪ ˖ 🐺Ее вокал🙏 *Йеджи спела LIA — Asylum ⤷ ゛@trustryeji ˎˊ˗
custom 522884512920843828815custom 50868395818237316226custom 50826822038050588554custom 54431263991351305991
It’z hwang in your #fans.ᐟ.ᐟ kitty sent you 𓏲 ๋࣭ ࣪ ˖ 🐺Йе начала танцевать магнетик от айллит. ее соло выступление — магнетик??😭 ⤷ ゛@trustryeji ˎˊ˗
custom 508683958182373162214custom 54430708179633529964custom 54431263991351305994custom 52288451292084382883custom 50826822038050588552
It’z hwang in your #fans .ᐟ.ᐟ kitty sent you 𓏲 ๋࣭ ࣪ ˖ 🐺Йеджи начала эфир в фанс и дала нам спойлер к фанмиту😊 ⤷ ゛@trustryeji ˎˊ˗
custom 524899111569198150715custom 52288451292084382886custom 50868395818237316224custom 53482694522427365611custom 54431263991351305991
не по теме конечно НО КАК ВАМ ФАКТ ТОГО,ЧТО У ЮНЫ БУДЕТ ПЕРВОЕ СОЛО ВЫСТУПЛЕНИЕ НА AAA??
custom 522884512920843828828custom 508268220380505885510custom 50868395818237316227custom 53482694522427365611custom 54431263991351305991
It’z shin in your #ryuinst .ᐟ.ᐟ candy sent you 𓏲 ๋࣭ ࣪ ˖ 🐵OMG SHE LOOKS SO CUTE ⤷ ゛@trustryeji ˎˊ˗
custom 508268220380505885515custom 52288451292084382887custom 54431263991351305996custom 50868395818237316225
It’z shin in your #twitter .ᐟ.ᐟ candy sent you 𓏲 ๋࣭ ࣪ ˖ 🐵обновление тви 𝟯 𝗗𝗔𝗬𝗦 𝗨𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗟 ⋰˚✩ ITZY The 5th Fan Meeting 있지 믿지, 날자! “ALL IN, MIDZY” ⤷ ゛@trustryeji ˎˊ˗
custom 54430708179633529969custom 50826822038050588555custom 52288451292084382885custom 50868395818237316224custom 54431263991351305993
▪️Other | 260804 ── .✦ MIDZY, мы просим вашего внимания! Совсем недавно нашёлся телеграм-канал, в котором открыто сексуализируют участниц ITZY, создавая с ними непристойные видео с помощью ИИ. ── .✦ Мы умоляем вас кинуть жалобу на этот канал ( @itzxai ) и ни в коем случае не взаимодействовать с ним! » tags:#other ➖ @MIDZYSUPPITZY ➖
custom 52489911156919815075custom 54431263991351305993custom 52288451292084382882
It’z hwang in your #yebubble .ᐟ.ᐟ kitty sent you 𓏲 ๋࣭ ࣪ ˖ 🐺Йе в баббл🌟 ⤷ ゛@trustryeji ˎˊ˗
custom 522884512920843828811custom 50826822038050588556custom 50868395818237316224custom 54431263991351305993custom 52489911156919815072
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @trustryeji. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
а какая ваша любимая сольная песня Йеджи?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 202,866 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴛrusᴛ ryᴇji” (@trustryeji), 437 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trustryeji.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.