Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Виктор Трумпель

Channel

Виктор Трумпель

@trumpelIT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

168subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001593572154
TypeChannel
Username@trumpelIT
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/trumpelIT

Growth

167168167.58 August 2026 — 167 subscribers8 August 2026 — 167 subscribers16 August 2026 — 168 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167–168 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:37168+1
8 Aug 2026, 15:46167no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:45167first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

236 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12452.5%
👍4418.6%
229.32%
custom 5389038097860144794218.90%
custom 5307576466769193020114.66%
🤔83.39%
31.27%
🥱20.847%
🤮10.424%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2025 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @trumpelIT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2025 to 29 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,570
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
399
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJ2tHEg118 December 202518 December 2025

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2025 to 29 June 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 22:34 UTC413 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как запустить SaaS? Все запускают свои продукты и микросаасы при помощи AI. Я, честно, не знаю как это делать ( Я запускал несколько стартапов еще до AI AI AI... и ни один из них не дошел даже до первой продажи! Чтобы понять, как запускать продукты, я позвал на подкаст человека, кто сделал десятки успешных запусков и иногда даже без кода. Эдвард но не Деминг с канала Японский продакт (@pmkaizen) Приятного просмо

👍5custom 53890380978601447942🥱1

23 Apr 2026, 07:52 UTC510 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, всем привет! Как видите, я продолжаю искать себя в IT-видеоблогинге, и на этот раз постарался прыгнуть выше головы. Мне хотелось снять что-то необычное и полезное, поэтому я записал подкаст с человеком, который большую часть своей жизни посвятил проектированию зданий. В этом видео я сравниваю две индустрии — IT и проектирование. Ставлю их «нос к носу», чтобы показать общие проблемы. Такой подход помогает

custom 538903809786014479410👍4🤔2🤮1

21 Apr 2026, 19:26 UTC412 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Программист 80% времени читает код и только 20% пишет. Вот вы помните, ещё буквально недавно спрашивали какого-нибудь сеньора: «Сколько кода ты пишешь?» И он с умным видом отвечал: «За день могу и ни строчки не написать. Программист большую часть времени код читает!» И куда сейчас подевались все эти умники? Почему-то теперь все только и рассказывают о том, как они с нейронками пишут код. Лично я себе не изменяю и

👍5custom 53075764667691930203custom 53890380978601447943

31 Mar 2026, 07:50 UTC450 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я буду последним человеком в этом мире, кто напишет пост про АИ. Ничего нового и умного я не скажу, но вот какой парадокс я сейчас понять абсолютно не могу: вы заметили, что почти все компании сейчас выдают рекомендации по тому как использовать или не использовать АИ своим сотрудникам? Где-то добровольно-принудительно заставляют использовать, где-то запрещают наотрез. Где-то говорят использовать, а потом после круп

👍9custom 53890380978601447946

18 Mar 2026, 07:42 UTC431 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Когда сказали, что ИИ заменит 90% программистов и на рынке останутся только сильнейшие и IT-шники такие:

custom 53075764667691930208

28 Jan 2026, 08:44 UTC530 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Муд дня: Многие хотят замутить свой бизнес или пет-проект, чтобы быть "свободным". Я хочу запилить свой SAAS только для того, чтобы посылать на... пользователей, которые приходят с проблемами из Safari... извините...

3🔥2🤔1

15 Jan 2026, 16:24 UTC537 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бестолковая расхайпленная книга Решил я, значит, прокачать свои блогерские навыки, чтобы вам было интереснее читать — между прочим! По советам триллиарда людей из разных сфер взял эту книгу, так как обещалось, что она научит меня строить интересные истории. И ЧТО?! Вода, скучно, ничего не понятно, слишком далеко от основной темы. Если «выжать» содержимое книги до практической сути, получится одна страница А4 шрифт

🔥10👍1🥱1

12 Jan 2026, 20:02 UTC368 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто такие нэпманы в IT и почему вам стоит с ними познакомиться? После окончания гражданской войны в 1920-м году и провала военного коммунизма, страна погрузилась в кризис! 🔴 Нужно было срочно оживить рынок, поэтому внедрили НЭП (Новую экономическую политику). Суть НЭПа заключалась в том, что любой, у кого хватало мозгов и начального капитала, мог начать небольшой бизнес: купи-продайка, услуги, общепит. Сейчас таког

🔥155🤔1

23 Dec 2025, 16:15 UTC409 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как умрет frontend в 2026м? Видео о том 🔺как мы останемся без работы 🔺как будем влочить свое жалкое существование под мостом 🔺как будем умолять взять нас работать за еду ... Конечно же это шутка. В видео по сухим фактам разобрал что ждет fontend-разработку в следующем году. Обязательно смотреть всем тревожникам! Или если есть друзья, которые думскролят по поводу будущего фронтенда, тоже им кидайте. Пусть протрезв

🔥13

18 Dec 2025, 10:42 UTC≈1,570 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJ2tHEg

Что общего между лудоманами, трейдерами и айтишниками? 📊 Как лудоман думает, на что поставить — на красное или на чёрное, как трейдер в панике мечется от одной ценной бумаги к другой, так и айтишники мечутся между языками программирования и технологиями. Это я сейчас про модную тенденцию переката. Когда чувак хочет из одного стека перекатиться в другой. Вцелом, нет вопросов к смене стека, если это делается осознанн

🔥151

7 Dec 2025, 12:52 UTC391 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👩‍🔬 Молекула, на которой держатся все структуры данных Абсолютно все структуры данных (ну типо вообще все) можно выразить через обычный нерасширяемый массив. Понимание того как это работает, упрощает тему вцелом. Ты можешь бесконечно зазубривать структуры данных, а потом разволноваться в нужный момент и все забыть. Либо ты понимаешь как любую структуру декомпозировать до обычного массивчика с 4-мя слотами и для т

🔥93👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @trumpelIT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 397,527 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Виктор Трумпель” (@trumpelIT), 168 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trumpelIT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.