Анатолий, "вероятно" вы наебались с прогнозом на прошедшую ночь.
🍌1

Channel
@truhaBidon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
163subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002110517222 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @truhaBidon |
| Description | Всё как есть. Обсуждаем настоящие (и не очень настоящие;)) новости, порой с лёгким шлейфом специфического юмора. Некоторые вещи - вымысел! Осторожно, проскакивают мемы!! |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/truhaBidon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 163 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 163 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
89 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 36 | 40.4% | |
| 🍌 | 21 | 23.6% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 11.2% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 10.1% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 7.87% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 4.49% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 2.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Анатолий, "вероятно" вы наебались с прогнозом на прошедшую ночь.
🍌1
Еще один вылез. Заскриним прогноз Анатолия. Сверимся через некоторое время. Претендент на тоже звание, что и оратор постом выше. Вообще, тактика у Толика прикольная — делать мильон прогнозов, в надежде, что хоть какой-нибудь сбудется. А потом с важным хлебалом кричать "я, же говорил!!!"
🍌1
А давайте-ка заскриним. Как говорится : "на пидора" Осенью посмотрим. А то вдруг человек лития не дополучил, пока в больничке лежал 😏
🍌1😁1
Я в экономике не разбираюсь практически никак. Но видя такие новости даже со своей "неграмотной колокольни" понимаю, что без сильных, беспрецедентных событий из этого всего американцем не вылезти из кризиса. Что-то мне подсказывает, что наши "святые 90е" покажутся детской прогулкой в этом случае) Посмотрим
🍌1
Какая же свинота) К Абрамовичу симпатий не имею. Однако сам нюанс прикольный. То есть, Шевченко в 30 летнем возрасте припиздил в Челси российского олигарха за длинным рублём. Ни хрена у него там не получилось, но денег поднял неплохо. Никаких зазрений совести брать деньги у него не было. Теперь, говорит, отДАЙ деняк от Челси Украине 🤣 Что тут скажешь — типичный хохол)
👍2💯2🍌1
Откат в 50%😏😏😏 Сильно, стильно, свежо и непринуждённо😂
😁2🍌1
Вот с этим да, большая проблема. Автор канала столкнулся с этим всем разгулом ИИ во всей красе 😂 Занимаюсь судебным процессом, являясь одним из соистцов. Дело сложное. Должного образования в этой сфере нет, но держать руку на пульсе ж надо) плюс контролировать наемного юриста тоже нужно. Вот, один раз, решил всецело довериться бездумной машине подготовиться к заседанию. Искал аналогичные дела, дошедшие до Верховного…
👀4🍌1👍1
Блин, сколько ж денег будет попилено) Впрочем, это их дело😏 Сам результат интересен. В Китае закупятся по итогу, переклеив шильдики или будут также "успешно" сами производить, как свой гиперзвук?😉
🍌2😁2
Какой "тонкий" намёк на возможность зимней военной кампании)
😁4🍌1
Тут Владимир Александрович выдал речь. Решил помочь тем, кто не понимает мовы, переведя на русский язык. Итак: Сейчас одинаково важно не поддаваться на желание американской стороны, в особенности этого рыжего хера, и продолжать разрушать эту помойку, которой я руковожу с 2019 года. Ведётся огромная работа вместе с моими европейскими коллегами по распиливанию всей западной помощи для Украины. Верю, что пока тарасы …
😁7🍌1
Эта полу&бнутая не хочет более географически близкого бывшего соседа вспомнить? Югославия
🔥6🍌1
Сегодня уже 25. Чего грел-то?) Чего-то прям с эффектом ОГО не заметил. Или упустил что? Или Юра опять писдил?😏
🍌2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @truhaBidon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 869,001 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТРУХА Байдена” (@truhaBidon), 163 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/truhaBidon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.