090826 | FANS update 헤헤 안녕하세용 저입니당🍀 오늘의 티엠아이를 가져왔습니듀!!! 오늘은 어제 뜬 컨 포에 대한 TMI 인데요... 원래 껌이 제 소품이 아니었는데 원래 주인이 풍선을 불지 못하는 이슈로 (조혜진ㅋ) 제가 불게 되었답니당? ㅎㅎㅎㅎㅎ 근데 엄청 크게 잘 불었죠 저 좀 잘하져!!?! 헤헤 비하인드 느낌으로 말해드리고 싶은 TMI였어요 좋은 주말 보내요💚

Channel
Рест • 국초록 Kuk Chorok
@trueechorok
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004406994821 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trueechorok |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 5 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trueechorok |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 31 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 27 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 27 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 244.8%
- avg views ÷ 31 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 75.9
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (5 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 759 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3s
- Average length
- 3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
concept photos with OURBIRTHDAY
080826 | FANS update 🎂 Our Birthda - CONCEPT PHOTOS #국초록 OURBIRTHDAY 1st Single [Our Birthday] ➩ 2026. 8. 19 6PM
070826 | FANS update 오늘의 TMI~🍀를 알려드립니당중공송 저는 폰 케이스에 귀요미 스티커 모으는 걸 좋아해요 귀여우면 다 제 폰 뒤로 들어온답니다>_< 오눌의 티엠 아이 끝~ 오늘도 좋은 하루 보냈길!!!💚
w/ Hyewon w/ Hyewon and Hyejin
060826 | FANS update 여러분 안녕---하세유 오늘의 TMI를 들고 왔어요😎 사실 저는 혜오니 폰으로 찍는 걸 좋아합니당충총헤헤 앞으루 몰래 많이 찍어볼게여🫣📸☘️ 오늘의 TMI 끝!!!
060826 | X update 𝕎ℍ𝕀ℙ-ℍ𝕆ℙ
060826 | FANS update
w/ Baby
050826 | FANS update Do it now😝😎😝😎 저희 퍼포먼스 비디오 잘 보셨나용?-? 저희도 스포 없 이 10시에 처음 봤는데요.. 진쨔 소리 지르면서 봤어요 >0<!!!! 저희가 잘하는 걸 짧은 시간 내에 여러분께 다 보여 드 리고 싶어서 모든 테이크 다 열심히 찍었거든용🥹 멋 있게 나와서 너무너무 다행이에요 퍼포장인 OBD 어떤데!!!!!송스용 데뷔하면 더 멋있을 거예용🥳 궁금하시져? 진짜 얼마 안 남았어요~❤❤❤❤
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @trueechorok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 266,868 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рест • 국초록 Kuk Chorok” (@trueechorok), 31 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trueechorok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.