Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kawai Ruka

Channel

Kawai Ruka

@kawaisetter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,435subscribers

+50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002510101813
TypeChannel
Username@kawaisetter
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kawaisetter

Growth

1,3851,4351,4106 August 2026 — 1,385 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,385 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,388 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,386 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,418 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,420 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,435 subscribers6 August 202619 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 13 days, net +50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,378–1,443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 11:531,435+15
16 Aug 2026, 15:181,420+2
12 Aug 2026, 21:041,418+32
10 Aug 2026, 04:351,386-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:101,388+3
6 Aug 2026, 17:171,385no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:411,385first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.27%
avg views ÷ 1,435 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.2
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (6 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total182
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC12 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @SippingOnBaemonPhoto

«Выскажи свое мнение и беги» от SOB здесь вы можете анонимно выразить своё мнение по поводу какого-либо архива/архивера, какого-нибудь случая и т.п. Писать: @rinakawaibot

6 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC30 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

отсюда репостнула половину, а на половину подписалась, и одному подарила подарок

6 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC26 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @winhisonPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

6 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC24 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hearttoasaPhoto

251028 @.⊹ASA Weverse Update ˖·˳.笑門来福✂️

6 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC22 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @imseahparkPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

6 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC16 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ImTruestEvonSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

6 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC13 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @trueechorokPhoto

060826 | FANS update 여러분 안녕---하세유 오늘의 TMI를 들고 왔어요😎 사실 저는 혜오니 폰으로 찍는 걸 좋아합니당충총헤헤 앞으루 몰래 많이 찍어볼게여🫣📸☘️ 오늘의 TMI 끝!!!

6 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC14 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @natyytaPhoto

MPD직캠 키스오브라이프 나띠 직캠 4K 'SWEAT' KISS OF LIFE NATTY FanCam

6 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC13 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @myMaiii9Photo

260805 Post on Instagram 【MAI的甜蜜問候送上!專屬手寫字公開 💌】 憑著甜美笑容和自然流露的溫暖魅力圈粉無數的MAI,帶著她最標誌性的笑容來向大家打招呼了💓,還準備了手寫的心意傳遞給大家🖊️。 . 這次她將屬於izna與naya之間最真摯的「Infinity Love」親筆寫下,把這份溢出屏幕的少女心意化為專屬告白。她已經準備好滿滿的能量🔋,在麥花臣場館等著大家! . 門票🎫即將於8月18日(星期二),中午12時起⏰公開發售!不想錯過這個心動現場的話🎉,現在就立刻鎖定門票吧! . ▼ ▽ ▼ ▽ ▼ ▽ 公開發售詳情 ▼ ▽ ▼ ▽ ▼ ▽ 📆公開發售日期:2026年8月18日(星期二) 🕛公開發售時間:中午12:00起 💰票價:HK$1,799 (VIP) / HK$1,399 / HK$899(全場座位)

6 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC12 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @jeungirlPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kawaisetter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 14,952 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kawai Ruka” (@kawaisetter), 1,435 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kawaisetter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.