Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TrueData Options Decoder

@truedata_options_decoder

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

1,026subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001436042827
TypeChannel
Username@truedata_options_decoder
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/truedata_options_decoder

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@truedata_ws_api/3681 May 2026, 05:20 UTC@truedata_options_decoder/357 · this entry1 May 2026, 05:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@truedata_ws_api/37010 May 2026, 04:41 UTC@truedata_options_decoder/358 · this entry10 May 2026, 04:43 UTC1.0072 seconds
@truedata_options_decoder/359 · this entry5 Jun 2026, 05:39 UTC@truedata_ws_api/3715 Jun 2026, 05:39 UTC1.00under a minute
@truedata_options_decoder/364 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC@truedata_ws_api/37226 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@truedata_options_decoder/365 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 06:17 UTC@truedata_ws_api/37329 Jul 2026, 06:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@truedata_ws_api/37831 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC@truedata_options_decoder/370 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@truedata_ws_api6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 25 February 2026 to 31 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @truedata_ws_api. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,0251,0261,025.57 August 2026 — 1,025 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,025 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,026 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,025–1,026 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:311,026+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:311,025no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:581,025first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.9%
avg views ÷ 1,026 subscribers
Avg views / post
286
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (15 February 202631 July 2026)
Views total2,001
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC172 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Closing Auction Session - All You Need to Know The Indian stock market is set to witness one of its biggest structural changes in recent years. SEBI has introduced the Closing Auction Session (CAS), coming into effect from 3rd August 2026, to make price discovery more transparent, efficient, and aligned with global market practices. Read More : https://tinyurl.com/4zzuavwk

29 Jul 2026, 06:17 UTC207 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨🙏 A Guru is the light in the dark, may you always be guided with pure wisdom and endless blessings. 🌟 https://www.truedata.in/

26 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC267 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Salute to the brave hearts who stood strong against every challenge and fought fearlessly for our nation. 🧡🤍💚 https://www.truedata.in/

24 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC258 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Web-based spreadsheet for traders Market Datafeed. Built for Speed. Ultra-fast real-time market data in a web-based spreadsheet. Launching Soon. Get ready to experience faster, smarter, and more reliable market data. 🚀

14 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC368 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

In the Option Chain New page, a custom column includes "Strike" and a "Numberpad" feature, which enables the creation of custom formulas to be added to the Option Chain custom view.

14 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC343 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A multi-straddle feature has been implemented. Users may select any strike prices for put options (PE) and call options (CE); the system will aggregate data for all selected strikes and generate the corresponding plot.

5 Jun 2026, 05:39 UTC548 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌿 Let us work together to protect forests, wildlife, and natural resources for a beautiful and sustainable future. 🌍💚 www.truedata.in

10 May 2026, 04:43 UTC557 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY To every mom, your love, warmth, and strength make every day brighter, calmer, and more meaningful for all. www.truedata.in

1 May 2026, 05:20 UTC546 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

May Lord Buddha bless your life with calmness happiness wisdom and inner peace guiding you towards harmony and positivity. Happy Buddha Purnima! https://www.truedata.in/

22 Apr 2026, 04:43 UTC601 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Protect the Earth now, because tomorrow depends on the choices we make today. https://www.truedata.in/

14 Apr 2026, 05:52 UTC575 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

May Waheguru’s divine blessings always guide and protect you. Wishing you and your family a very Happy Baisakhi .

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @truedata_options_decoder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TrueData Options Decoder” (@truedata_options_decoder), 1,026 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/truedata_options_decoder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.