Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fukutomi Tsuki

Channel

Fukutomi Tsuki

@truebunny9tsuki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

480subscribers

+57 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003992249405
TypeChannel
Username@truebunny9tsuki
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/truebunny9tsuki

Growth

423480451.510 August 2026 — 423 subscribers11 August 2026 — 429 subscribers17 August 2026 — 480 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 414–489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:49480+51
11 Aug 2026, 07:21429+6
10 Aug 2026, 19:01423first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 480 subscribers
Avg views / post
81.6
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held12 (9 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total979
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
67
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
67
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @truebunny9tsuki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC98 viewsread 10 August 2026

Пиар тайм с активом от @truebunny9tsuki с вас пдп ток если интересно репост этого и этого поста юз в кн в комм, макс. 3 10/? до стоп

10 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC52 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @danielleoflifePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

10 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC37 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @danielleoflifePhoto

23 April 2025 SPUR magazine Update Danielle from NewJeans graced the cover of the Japanese fashion and lifestyle magazine SPUR for its June 2025 issue, released on April 23, 2025.

10 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC40 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @linkleeseoSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

9 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC102 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @TrueRFRPhoto

ㅤ 🤩ㅤ🎀 𝑅𝑢𝑛 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑅𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑠 🎀 ✨ 𝑊𝑒'𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒 '𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑤𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑒 듣기 : 𝑅𝐹𝑅 - Место обсуждений каналов из энмикс комьюнити. Здесь можно поделиться своими мыслями, мнениями и признаниями ❤️ ; 가족 Администрация - Правила - Поддержать 🌸

9 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC88 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @forjangswonyPhoto

260809 @워녕이🎀 Bubble Message

9 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC76 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @OverheadNmixxPhoto

ᅠ🎁 𝖦𝖾𝗎𝗀𝖾 𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗄𝗄𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝗀𝖾𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋, 𝗐𝖾'𝗅𝗅 𝖻𝖾 ! それはあり。𝖮𝗁, 𝗈𝗈𝗁-𝗈𝗈𝗁 🎁 ᅠᅠKAM 🌴 Know About Me — ᅠᅠ пр𑄜ᥱкт, гдᥱ вы м𑄜жете выскαзать своᥱ мнᥱниᥱ 𑄜 люб𑄜м αрхиве или ег𑄜 влαдᥱльцᥱ из энмикс ᅠᅠᅠ к𑄜мьюнити☀️ ⟨ 🌴 ⟩ 𝖮𝗁, 𝖨'𝗆 𝖿𝖾𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗌𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗌𝗍 それじた! ☀️ 𝖠𝗁; 𝖮𝗁, 𝗈𝗁, 𝗈𝗁, 𝗒𝖾𝖺𝗁 ❤️

9 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC102 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @toaerichanPhoto

August 8, 2026 @지젤 Bubble Post

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @truebunny9tsuki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 341,826 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fukutomi Tsuki” (@truebunny9tsuki), 480 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/truebunny9tsuki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.