2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64–66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 20:22
65
no change
5 Oct 2026, 19:47
65
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 15 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
215.0%
avg views ÷ 65 subscribers
Avg views / post
140
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held
16 (15 September 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total
2,236
Reactions total
251
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Oct 2026, 20:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
408
Videos
6
Links
57
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
59s
Average length
59s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
251 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
150
59.8%
🔥
45
17.9%
😍
16
6.37%
🏆
9
3.59%
❤🔥
7
2.79%
👍
7
2.79%
🤗
7
2.79%
💔
6
2.39%
😁
4
1.59%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
100
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @trpr8dr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 September 2026 to 5 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Омг, смотрю список материалов, котлрый предполагается подготовить к замесу: акварель, акрил, масло, пастель, калька, миллиметровка, пластик для макетирования, файлы, и так далее и ещё далее...
Несколько лет назад я бы уже набирала всего и побольше на озоне) Потому что выбирать новые материалы и канцтовары -- это почти само по себе хобби.🤩
Но в этот раз решила поставить себе ограничение: использовать только то, что …
Пожалуй, не буду снова консервировать канал на год, впишусь в скетч-замес от kalacheva school.
Кто не успел в поезд инктобера, ай-да тоже🤗
Там предполагается сделать 6 работ в разных техниках -- от коллажа до монотипии.
Смотрю на список материалов и думаю по какому пути пойти: использовать замес как повод потратиться на новые художественные материалы🤩 или проявить чудеса изобретательности с тем, что найду дома🤔)
Сегодняшняя тема инктобера -- кактус.
Я в этом году, видимо, пропускаю, но пока смотрела чужие работы, вспомнила свою ещё из 2021-го. Покажу её и ещё одну картинку из той же серии.
#inktober2026
Попала в шорт-лист Буквального челленджа, ура! 😭🥰🎉 Победителям многократное ура и аплодисменты!!
Получается, мой проект вошёл в топ-33 работ (из 218 или больше).
Очень приятно, особенно учитывая тот факт, что программа минимум была просто дойти до конца))
Спасибо всем за комментарии, реакции и поддержку. И спасибо комьюнити за этот опыт и вдохновение и невероятное количество талантливых людей вокруг.
Практический…
#буквальный_челлендж завершение.
Оформила пару букав в рамки для людей, которые захотели забрать их себе. Добавила ручное паспарту с чернильными разводами, и получились вполне самостоятельные маленькие объекты.
Если вдруг вам тоже приглянулась какая-то буква, готова сделать такую же историю на заказ☺️
Да, это тот самый момент, где я пытаюсь не стесняться брать деньги за ручную работу 🙈
За 999 рублей😅 + доставка
Я закончила пищать от восторга, можно и с вами поделиться радостью)
Добрых 10 минут разбирала и рассматривала подарочки от @tomilina_polina
Спасибо-преспасибище❤️🔥❤️ Руки зачесались всё примениииить поскорее, с другой стороны страшно испортить, потратить материалы зря😅
#буквальный_челлендж
Ну всё, буквы закончились.
То есть новые буквы каждый день закончились, а сам алфавит теперь, надеюсь, ещё поживёт
Собрала проект, несу)
https://dprofile.ru/case/192305/rtutnye-bukvy-bkvc-2026
#буквальный_челлендж
Полина, я тронута, спасибо огромное! Я даже не надеялась (хотя лукавлю, конечно надеялась🙈😊), что меня как-то заметят и отметят, но не ждала по правде.
Вообще сейчас на этапе творчества, когда внешнее признание самое питающее и мотивирующее продолжать, учиться, пробовать, творить всякое) Очень ценно и приятнейше💔 ещё и подарочки какие ваааааа, чудесные😍
У нас еще одна номинация от постоянного участника БКВЧ — Полины Томилиной 🌎
В прошлом году она тоже выбирала один из рукотворных алфавитов и дарила автору душевные подарки🦋
В этом сезоне челленджа выбор Полины упал на ртутные буквы 🛠️
К автору букв полетят пара блокнотов ручной работы (а4-ватоджи и а5-коптик), книга про леттеринг, открытки, бумага ручного отлива и kleisterpapier, еще кое-что по мелочи и, конечно, …
А если без шуток, спасибо за реакции, комментарии, поддержку и интерес. Мне невероятно приятно, что мои буквы откликнулись такому количеству людей. Особенно потому что среди этих людей мастера, работами которых я сама восхищаюсь и восхищалась ещё до челленджа)
Кто дошёл до 33 буквы, обнимемся🤗
#буквальный_челлендж
#буквальный_конструктор
❤19🤗7👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @trpr8dr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Марина наверняка” (@trpr8dr), 65 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trpr8dr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.