Channel
@troynkon
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
105subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001625767848 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @troynkon |
| Created | 14 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/troynkon |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 105 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 103 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 104 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 104 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 28 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
346 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 222 | 64.2% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 10.7% | |
| 🤮 | 23 | 6.65% | |
| 🤡 | 22 | 6.36% | |
| 🤬 | 19 | 5.49% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 3.18% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 1.45% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 1.16% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.578% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.289% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 346 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2023 to 3 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Самое главное, что дальнобойщик наглядно продемонстрировал слабость выдумки Оленька Карач, против которой фанипольский фотограф и слова плохого не сказал за все это время. Что и понятно по большому счёту, ведь парнишка на зарплате. Она и диктует условия. И вроде как не было стримов у говноеда с русскими политиками. Не было сотрудничества с Бычковским. Не было фотографий в русском одеянии царя в парке Челюскинцев🤷♂ …
😁17👍2🔥1
Делали все, оказывается🤣, но никому про это, правда, неизвестно🤷♂️. Делали скорее всего диванные эксперты-аналитики ШОСовских войск. Небось и OSINT Кондратенко тоже пару кейсиков оформил😂 А добился результата Латушко. Ну что ж. Так бывает. Так бывает когда не языком, а делом. Возможно на уровне Ужгорода Кондратенко и добился каких-то результатов по этому вопросу, но что-то нам про это не известно.
😁23👍2
Опять активизировался гражданин Литвы и большой друг карач - Папшо. Ну, то самое быдло с лицом не обременённым интеллектом. Краткая характеристика, если кто-то успел забыть. Учит гражданин Литвы как нужно бороться. Время от времени рассказывает как он сам, оказывается, боролся с режимом🤣. Как ходил на голосование 😂 в Беларуси и как он голосовал🤷♂️ Небось ещё и в акциях протеста участвовал😂 Нарратив стандартен и …
😁17❤1🤮1
😁😁😁😁😁😁
😁12🤡4❤3🤔1
Прошу заметить! Не режим, а Беларусь.
🤡15🤬6👍3
Виталька "говноед" Кондратенко конечно редкостный недоумок. От небольшого, размером с семечку, ума, прорежимный блоХЕР старательно натягивает сову на глобус. Имейте ввиду все: Если вы в Минске, то вы в компании луки. Вам очень повезло, если вы живёте в Вашингтоне. Тогда вашим компаньоном является Байден. Вот такая логика у выпускника ПТУ.
😁18👍5🔥2
Латушко в Киеве. И какой же он агент после этого?
👍21👏2
Пилип Болкунец 🤣🤣🤣🤣
😁19🔥7
Как же знатно пригорело у пророссийских сил.
🤬13🤮5🤯3😁3🤡1
Валери пошёл ва-банк и проиграл😂
😁29
Photo, posted without a caption
😁30
Цепкало бьётся в конвульсиях Особенно иронично выглядят ссылки на пророссийского политолога болкунца, который с 2016го года имел ПМЖ в рф. И который отрицал возможное нападении рф на соседние страны, а также отрицал возможно аннексирования Беларуси.
😁21👍3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @troynkon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Троянский конь” (@troynkon), 105 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/troynkon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.