Channel
@trolleybusly
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002667906842 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trolleybusly |
| Description | Троллейбусов в Москве уже нет, но благостные мысли как будто ты едешь и думаешь думы остались. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trolleybusly |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 50 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 50 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 March 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 154 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
81 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 28 | 34.6% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 32.1% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 11.1% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 6.17% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 3.70% | |
| 🤪 | 3 | 3.70% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Все же несмотря на мою технологическую продвинутость (ну я надеюсь все-таки), инструкции по тому как добраться до места я чаще всего даю как в старом добром Morrowind, на котором и вырос, собственно. Никакой мини-карты, никаких гео-точек, разве что с направлениями света я все еще не научился обращаться по-свойски
❤3🤣3
Шел по улице, видел чела, который очень долго и очень широко зевал. В голове совершенно неосознанно всплыл собирательный образ бабули, которая что-то ворчала про то, что так неприлично, и вообще ворона залетит. Однако влетела на ворона, а муха.
😁6👍1🙊1
Был мне дан знак в виде сна, в котором я узнал, что моя любимая контент-криейторша из UK собирается в Копенгаген, и я, испытывая лютый FOMO, не еду в аэропорт пытаться ее встречать и делать прочие фанатские глупости, а записываю себе голосовое, чтобы не забыть запостить сюда в Троллейбусли, что я в целом может быть и фанател когда-то от разных исполнителей, но никогда не был таким вот фанатом, чтобы как у Билли Айлиш…
❤7
Незаметно подкралась середина лета, а я в читательском запое. Хотел порекомендовать свежеобсужденную на книжном клубе «Пиранези» Сюзанны Кларк, а ее резко забанили за мимолетное упоминание действующих веществ. Остается читать когда-то мне приснившуюся статью «Contemporary Art That Makes You A Patriot»
😁5
Московские экскурсоводы be like: «Наташа Ростова была высокосветской старухой. Понимаете, это титул!»
😎2
Едем
😳 Троллейбус-кинотеатр запустят в Петербурге Внутри городского троллейбуса будет потолок с эффектом ночного неба, а также оборудование для показа фильмов. ❤ Piter Map - Подписаться 📲 Мы в Max
❤4
Знаете, русскому языку не хватает еще одной формы ответа на бинарные вопросы (да/нет), как в шведском, норвежском или том же французском. Ну каждый раз при ответе на отрицательный вопрос типа «не спишь?» или «не работаешь?» воспроизвожу формулу «да, не работаю; нет, не работаю» и задумываюсь, а что сказать, если работаю. И вместо емкого jo или si говоришь «да нет же, работаю». Дэ?
❤3✍2😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
В районе сада Эрмитаж был найден призрак Лампмастера. Вообще давно не было такой красивой синхронизации погоды, трека в плеере и «картинки» (kak eto po-russki?!) Ну почти год прошел со знакомства с Clair Obscur. Все еще остро и актуально.
🔥4🗿1
Фоллоу-ап по произношению. Видимо, только лютые олды типа меня говорят «бесщая» и «исщерной ткани». Зато более менее все вокруг Москвы говорят «скушно», а вокруг Питера — «скучно». Эх, слушал тут недавно старый аудиспектакль по «451⁰ по Фаренгейту», там такой сочный старомосковский акцент, ничего от него уж не осталос.
❤5
Пришел на концерт голландской группы и сразу средний рост аудитории 190+
😁8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @trolleybusly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 754,325 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Троллейбусли” (@trolleybusly), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trolleybusly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.