Channel
@trnflx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001780694015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trnflx |
| Description | ww/: Quavo x Takeoff , Rich Amiri, LAZER DIM 700, Diego Money, Termynologyst, 800pts, Clonnex, Lil Morty & more $40 animation $100 lyric video $150 3d animation @teranoflex |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trnflx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 108 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 108 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 15 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
119 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 41 | 34.5% | |
| custom 5433919505375968101 | 39 | 32.8% | |
| custom 5465486278050979232 | 19 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5323479115758576508 | 15 | 12.6% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 2.52% | |
| custom 5332498774713443168 | 2 | 1.68% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2024 to 2 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
DOPE BOY PHONE 📞 @quavohuncho @yrntakeoff motion by Me W @062babyranger Cover by @jackscott.co @gecofilmedit
custom 54654862780509792329custom 54339195053759681015👍3👎1custom 53234791157585765081
Signed teranoflex
Stage Visuals for Clonnex 💖 pictures, plasticine stop motion & drawing by me vfx, cut & crt by @teranoflex
custom 543391950537596810113custom 53234791157585765085custom 54654862780509792323👍1👎1
Signed teranoflex
HNY🎉
Signed teranoflex
https://www.instagram.com/symmetriaaa/
custom 54339195053759681014
Signed teranoflex
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53234791157585765087👍4custom 54339195053759681012
Signed teranoflex
https://www.instagram.com/p/DBBhlDos9XQ/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
custom 54339195053759681011
Signed teranoflex
Europe Tour Stage Visuals for @richamiri @warready.online vfx by @teranoflex picture & logo styling by @fxckinghellkid10 big thx @jodejenee
custom 54654862780509792327👍3custom 53234791157585765082
Signed teranoflex
Posted without readable text
custom 54339195053759681014👍1
Signed teranoflex
🙃🙃🙃
Signed teranoflex
Animation and cover for Diego Money animation by me / cover by @fxckinghellkid10
👍4custom 53324987747134431682custom 54339195053759681012👎1
Signed teranoflex
ЗДАВ НА ПРАВА PULL UP ON THE TÓNKA 🚗🚗🚗
👍10custom 54339195053759681012
Signed teranoflex
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54339195053759681016👍4
Signed teranoflex
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @trnflx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 134,910 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“teranoflex” (@trnflx), 108 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trnflx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.