Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⋆ Трихотилломания ᴄᴏɴꜰᴇssɪᴏɴ ๑

Channel

⋆ Трихотилломания ᴄᴏɴꜰᴇssɪᴏɴ ๑

@trichotillomaniaconf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

142subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002795511754
TypeChannel
Username@trichotillomaniaconf
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/trichotillomaniaconf

Growth

1421441437 August 2026 — 144 subscribers8 August 2026 — 144 subscribers16 August 2026 — 142 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 142–144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 19:05142-2
8 Aug 2026, 21:30144no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:31144first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 142 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (9 January 202629 July 2026)
Views total34
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔2931.2%
2526.9%
😢1010.8%
🙏1010.8%
🍓77.53%
😭33.23%
22.15%
💊22.15%
🕊22.15%
😱22.15%
👍11.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC34 viewsread 8 August 2026

ребята, я не могу остановиться. уже где то год рву себе волосы, не знаю что мне делать((( посоветуйте пожалуйста 𔔀╏#take ᰍ ⏤ #ТТМ ✧ -°‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ ๋. ꒷ 𓆩𝅄 @trichotillomaniaconf [𖦹]

Signed ⚞◌⃘𔓕‌ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩१ 𝄄 𐔌𓆪。#♾️📌˚. ᵎᵎ

17 May 2026, 11:15 UTC141 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𔔀╏#take ᰍ ⏤ #ТТМ ✧ -°‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ ๋. ꒷ 𓆩𝅄 @trichotillomaniaconf [𖦹]

2

Signed ⚞ ◌⃘𔓕‌ ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩ १𝄄 🫗 、𐔌﹫𓆪。〖РЕСТ? КФКМ〗

17 May 2026, 11:15 UTC134 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Здравствуйте, занимаюсь ТТМ уже почти год.первые месяцы для меня были нормальными (ничего не значали) потом мои друзья начали говорить :"оо ты причёску сминела?" а потом начали появляться залысины. Да такие что за километр видно. Моя мама сразу на это обратила внимание,она даже мне посоветовала постричься налысо но я отказалась. Где то уже во время школьного года одноклассники начали над этим шутить и говорить" ты гд

2🙏1

Signed ⚞ ◌⃘𔓕‌ ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩ १𝄄 🫗 、𐔌﹫𓆪。〖РЕСТ? КФКМ〗

15 May 2026, 11:35 UTC107 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Здравствуйте,я страдаю с ТТМ уже 6лет,я начала вырывать волосы в 3ем классе в рандомный вечер,мне брили голову 5раз что бы я перестала это делать,но нет я не ходила к психотерапевтам потомучто у нас семья которая не понимает что это не дурная привычка а болезнь,хочу что бы вы мне помогли справиться с этим. В данное время я покрытая изза лысин,хочу вернуть свои густые и красивые волосы😭 𔔀╏#take ᰍ ⏤ #ТТМ ✧ -°‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌

💔4

Signed ⚞ ◌⃘𔓕‌ ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩ १𝄄 🫗 、𐔌﹫𓆪。〖РЕСТ? КФКМ〗

15 May 2026, 11:34 UTC104 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уже несколько лет вырываю волосы и ем их, при этом у меня некий ритуал перед поеданием: я вырываю волос, накручиваю на язык и зубами перемалываю максимально мелко. В 11 лет мать увидела залысину на проборе и только тогда я начала немного сдерживать себя. Волосы отросли немного и прическа выглядит куда лучше, жаль, что мания не ушла. Я всё так же рву волосы на голове, бровях, ресницах и даже на лобке. И ем их, мелко-м

💔4

Signed ⚞ ◌⃘𔓕‌ ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩ १𝄄 🫗 、𐔌﹫𓆪。〖РЕСТ? КФКМ〗

11 Apr 2026, 10:28 UTC163 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

не знаю точно ли ттм у меня или нет, но вроде как ситуация подходит под тематику кф, просто дайте выговориться!!!!!! Я РВУ НА СЕБЕ ВОЛОСЫ С ЛЕТ 4.☠☠☠☠☠☠☠ самые яркие периоды были 3 раза: как раз таки 4 года, ±9 лет и сейчас идет, остановиться не могу, помогите. в 4 года у меня что-то отобрали, 5 рублей или игрушку, не так важно, результатом стало то что я за тихий час успел себе волосы вырвать на виске до заметной з

😢4

Signed ⚞ ◌⃘𔓕‌ ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩ १𝄄 ☁️🫗 、𐔌﹫𓆪。

26 Mar 2026, 16:26 UTC194 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всем здрасте, у меня почти не осталось ресниц, как мне теперь ходить к окулисту-без понятия. 𔔀╏#take ᰍ ⏤ #ТТМ ✧ -°‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ ๋. ꒷ 𓆩𝅄 @trichotillomaniaconf [𖦹]

💔51

Signed ⚞ ◌⃘𔓕‌ ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩ १𝄄 ☁️🫗 、𐔌﹫𓆪。

14 Mar 2026, 15:31 UTC229 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

БЛЯЯ, СВЯЖИТЕ МНЕ РУКИ, Я НЕ МОГУ ОСТАНОВИТЬСЯ. Я ОПЯТЬ ВОЛОСЫ НА ПРОБОРЕ РВУ СУУКААА 🌟 𔔀╏#admtake ᰍ ⏤ ✧ #ТТМ -°‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ ๋ 𓆩𝅄 @trichotillomaniaconf [𖦹]

💔5🍓1

Signed ⚞ ◌⃘𔓕‌ ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩ १𝄄 、𐔌﹫𓆪。

8 Mar 2026, 15:15 UTC271 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Страдаю этим с 8 лет😭😭 Началось все с того что я просто вырвала по волоску когда нужно было на чем то сосредоточиться, потом начала делать это регулярно, просто каждый день, потом в 10 дошло и до ресниц, сейчас их вырываю даже чаще чем волосы, лысин у меня не было но ресницы заметно начали выпадать, мои друзья заметили но родня пока нет, сейчас мне уже 12 избавиться не могу, пока пишу пост сижу и вырываю уже 5 волос

💔4🙏1

Signed ⚞ ◌⃘𔓕‌ ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩ १𝄄 、𐔌﹫𓆪。

7 Mar 2026, 22:08 UTC228 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ааээ У меня части верхних ресниц нет Немогу прекратить😭 И волосы 4-5 см изза этого Причем пару длинных волосинок спереди и малюсенький пучок сзади Приходится изза этого ужаса носить косынку всегда😭😭😭 Еще я когда вырываю волосы сьедаю прозрачные корешки😭 Главное не отчаиваться Нашелся человек который полюбил меня зная все мои проблемы в том числе и эту Он говорит что я все равно самая красивая и лучшая Хоть и изза это

💔6😭3

Signed ⚞ ◌⃘𔓕‌ ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩ १𝄄 、𐔌﹫𓆪。

28 Feb 2026, 16:13 UTC211 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я не могу выдернуть конкретный волос уже полчаса я готова уже все волосы выдернуть чтобы его найти 𔔀╏#take ᰍ ⏤ #ТТМ ✧ -°‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ ๋. ꒷ 𓆩𝅄 @trichotillomaniaconf [𖦹]

🙏5

Signed ⚞ ◌⃘𔓕‌ ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩ १𝄄 、𐔌﹫𓆪。

21 Feb 2026, 10:59 UTC247 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тв кв абьюз насилие бебебе Всем пр хочу поведать о своей истории Вырывание волос(в моем случае ресниц и бровей) у меня началось лет с ±5. Не помню из-за чего и как, но это стало началом пиздеца. Понятное дело маленький ребенок не поймет что это плохо, поэтому в садике у меня не было не ресниц, не бровей. Мама ругала и била, а я стыдилась и плакала В начал. школе ситуация продолжилась, но я пыталась себя сдерживать

😢53

Signed ⚞ ◌⃘𔓕‌ ℕσ𝐭ɑ_ℒⅈɤɛ𝟽𝟼꒱. ֺ︩ १𝄄 、𐔌﹫𓆪。

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @trichotillomaniaconf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jan 2026, 09:20 UTCAnonymous Poll56 voters

🤩🤩🤍ы всё ещё страдаете ТТМ или же больше не вырываете волосы🤍 Как на данный момент обстоят дела?🤎

  1. — Я вырываю волосы.50%
  2. — Я вырываю волосы, но намного меньше!39%
  3. — Я не вырываю волосы.9%
  4. — Другой ответ.2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,288,378 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⋆ Трихотилломания ᴄᴏɴꜰᴇssɪᴏɴ ๑” (@trichotillomaniaconf), 142 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trichotillomaniaconf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.