Channel
@trhousee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
145subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002062737510 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @trhousee |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/trhousee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 145 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 145 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (3 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 553 |
| Reactions total | 87 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
87 reactions across 6 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5805670696033983899 | 13 | 14.9% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 12.6% | |
| custom 5305556337491465242 | 9 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5382168228950713272 | 9 | 10.3% | |
| 🍌 | 9 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5384130840026425134 | 8 | 9.20% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 9.20% | |
| custom 5318944944554015423 | 7 | 8.05% | |
| custom 5435944818679233903 | 5 | 5.75% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 5.75% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 2.30% | |
| custom 5386437160154967156 | 1 | 1.15% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩 🔤🔤🔤 🤩🤩 🤩 🔤 🤩 🤩🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤩 My heart is your's 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🥹Those bound by iron chains now 🥹They still stare toward the night 🥹Wounded souls still breathing 🥹Glory be upon them 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩rt, reacts??
🌟🤩😀😀😀😀😀😀 🌼 ✨🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌼🌼🌼🌼🌼 😀😀😀😀😀🐰🐰🐰 ✨✨✨ 🐰: ⲏᥱ ⳝ𐔤ⲇьⲧᥱ ⲧᥲⲕ ᥴⲧρ𐔖𐔏υ ⲕ ᥴᥱⳝᥱ. ⲏᥲⲙⲏ𐔖𐔏𐔖 ⳝ᥈ᥲ𐔏𐔖ρ𐔖ⲇⲏᥱᥱ — ⳝыⲧь ⲃᥱρⲏыⲙ ᥴⲃ𐔖ᥱⲙ𐔤 ᥴᥱρⲇц𐔤! 👻👻👻👻👻🌟: ⲏᥱ ⳅᥲⲕρыⲃᥲύ 👻👻𐔖ⲕⲏ𐔖: ᥒⲧυцы ᥒρυⲏᥱᥴ𐔤ⲧ ᥈юⳝ𐔖ⲃь υ 𐔤ⲏᥱᥴ𐔤ⲧ ᥴⲙᥱρⲧь Вивиан🌟 Будем рады активу😍 #kairynncosplay #zenlesszonezero #Alice #Vivian
🌟🎋🎋🎋🎋 🎋🎋🎋🎋🎋🎋 🎋🎋🎋🎋 🎋🎋🎋🎋🎋🎋🌟 ☆ Will: яяяяя ★ Mike: Сэмушка –если мы оба сходим с ума, то будем сходить с ума вместе, верно? –да, сойдем с ума вместе 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 Будем рады репостам и реакциям, заранее спасибо!! 🤩🤩 #cosplay • #strangerthings • #will • #willbyers • #mikewiller• #mike • #byler
custom 53055563374914652423custom 58056706960339838992custom 53189449445540154231
Итак. Дорогие. Насколько мы все знаем, до этого момента я жила без щитпоста как такового (он стал похож скорее на флуд, нежели на щп). Поэтому я решила все-таки создать новый, дабы не засорять основу.🤩 Так что, если вы хотите видеть от меня больше процессов по косплеям, и в принципе интересуетесь моей деятельностью, то велком: 👉🏻 https://t.me/+50rtnSCssNs2ZjY6
custom 53841308400264251346custom 54359448186792339035🍌3❤2
👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻 🎸 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🎸🎸🎸🎸 🌟 𝑃ℎ𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟 🎸 🎸🎸🎸🎸
💘1
Может быть. Вероятно. Я еще думаю.
❤6❤🔥4🍌3💘2
Пати прошла. Прикольно. Я уже в Листвянке. Из последних сил доживаю этот день. Хочу спать. Всем спасибо за внимание.🕯️ Фоточки прилагаю. А если серьезно: площадка была хорошая, мне понравилась, прямо комфортно было, но по организации и программе, к сожалению, мимо. Музыка тоже не очень, разве что под конец играло что-то более менее сносное. В общем, для меня, к сожалению, из интересного был только бар. Со многими уд…
custom 58056706960339838998custom 53821682289507132726❤🔥4❤3🍌2💘2🤡2custom 53189449445540154231
😉😘🤣🤨😄☺️ Вчера проходила пати от ханами На самом деле, я считала что тусовка будет более масштабней, и будет больше какой то развлекательной программы помимо танцев и трех станций, но было оч круто у Сажерук гадание на мемах оч крутое, и кстати сбылось!! Я не умерла от похмела хаха. Коктейли прикольные были, пыталась сфотать красиво чтобы показать!! Так же вот нарисовала Неви находясь под шафе, оставила свой тгк наде…
custom 53055563374914652426custom 53189449445540154235custom 53821682289507132723custom 58056706960339838993🍌1custom 53841308400264251341
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @trhousee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 316,723 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“the razumovsky house.” (@trhousee), 145 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trhousee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.