Channel
@treyerl
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
142subscribers
-110 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003578038389 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @treyerl |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/treyerl |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 142 | +3 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 139 | +4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 135 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 137 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 152 | -13 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 165 | -37 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 202 | -49 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 251 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 252 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 252 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
feels like one of those pure meme lore plays that live or die on whether the chat keeps riffing on it. robinhood listing is the only real hook here. nfa 0xb469b004177399e63ed8b0bb0103b5d45a72a804 https://gmgn.ai/robinhood/token/0xb469b004177399e63ed8b0bb0103b5d45a72a804 https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=0xb469b004177399e63ed8b0bb0103b5d45a72a804
you saw the chart.
gamble with trey pinned «update $swappy $swappy 38K to 499K (x13). genuinely did not expect this one to actually stick»
update $swappy $swappy 38K to 499K (x13). genuinely did not expect this one to actually stick
grok invented this little guy in a tweet and now a quiet crew is actually showing up around it, weird how that works. nfa FAN4aPBXLi6zv8CvmH2pvewa1tbrwwcf94rdTYMZpump https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/FAN4aPBXLi6zv8CvmH2pvewa1tbrwwcf94rdTYMZpump https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=FAN4aPBXLi6zv8CvmH2pvewa1tbrwwcf94rdTYMZpump
planet token with a blue uranus wearing a halo, the chat is mostly memeing the art and nothing else yet. nfa 0x701098ac423b9d181924e958f765b7bc09a37777 https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/0x701098ac423b9d181924e958f765b7bc09a37777 https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=0x701098ac423b9d181924e958f765b7bc09a37777
saw the name and stuck around for the flock forming in the chat. tropical vacation cosplay is doing the heavy lifting here. nfa 0x09fd8577a5d4a7202d41aa3040f4247df4ea2d98 https://gmgn.ai/robinhood/token/0x09fd8577a5d4a7202d41aa3040f4247df4ea2d98 https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=0x09fd8577a5d4a7202d41aa3040f4247df4ea2d98
gamble with trey pinned a photo
sitting on x2 with $UFROG, not what i expected today 🪶
frog ticker on robinhood and the chat is treating it like a bit. meme contest energy, low room, decent foot traffic. nfa 0x25507640371c8d53f282ee248d0f5007749af63e https://gmgn.ai/robinhood/token/0x25507640371c8d53f282ee248d0f5007749af63e https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=0x25507640371c8d53f282ee248d0f5007749af63e
name is riffing on the ai agent meta but this one actually has a broker ticker on robinhood which is kinda wild. feels like the real test of that narrative tbh. nfa 0x722dad04eade14c4df0f1a8f7bdd0934d78f2795 https://gmgn.ai/robinhood/token/0x722dad04eade14c4df0f1a8f7bdd0934d78f2795 https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=0x722dad04eade14c4df0f1a8f7bdd0934d78f2795
gamble with trey pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @treyerl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“gamble with trey” (@treyerl), 142 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/treyerl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.