Channel
@tresholder
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
107subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001501183049 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tresholder |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tresholder |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 107 | -1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 108 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 107 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 107 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
3 года назад, в своих первых лекциях по нейросеткам я говорил, что скоро вместо ответа в переписке система будет предлагать социально одобряемые варианты. Сначала это появилось в тикетных системах техподдержки. А теперь вот в личном кабинете комментариев ютуба. На скриншоте видно, что на живые (скорее всего) пользовательские комментарии у меня есть пара готовых ответов. Мне нужно просто выбрать и быстро прокликать. …
Проблемы восприятия Каждый раз когда кто-нибудь в разговоре произносит слова «рандомно, рандомный», в голове машинально произношу «случайно, случайный». Такой защитный автоперевод проясняющий ситуацию.
Леонид Тишков
Ladybug ещё один редактор пост-обработки изображений и видео
👍2
PainStation Игровой автомат на базе игры Pong, разработанный группой художников «/////////fur//// art entertainment interfaces», в 2001. Во время игры игроки кладут левые руки на PEU (Pain Execution Unit). Через этот блок игрок получает обратную связь в виде тепловых импульсов, электрических разрядов или ударов миниатюрным проволочным кнутом. Интенсивность зависит от игрового процесса и может увеличиваться. Независ…
🤔1
Шрифт, призванный скрыть сообщение от ИИ Думаю что не сложно научить ИИ прищуриваться (уменьшать изображение), для того что бы прочесть содержимое. Просто красивая иллюзия зашиты
Экранизация «Трудно быть богом» Алексея Германа противоречивая, но в этой картине режиссеру удалось показать другой мир и ткнуть зрителя лицом в средневековье.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcip_ayCHJs Здесь конечно можно долго шутить, Безруков, пластиковый плазмаган, летающая останкинская башня в конце трейлера… Но черт побери, почему именно эта эстетика? Акционеров так сильно впечатлили картины Дени Вильнёва, что они готовы вкладывать деньги чтобы повторить? Кино настиг тренд по типу цветовой обработки игр 2005-2013 (piss filter effect)? Амбиции режиссера «могу так же…
В 2002 году Дэвид Хокни и Люсьен Фрейд решили, что каждый из них напишет портрет другого. Хокни позировал примерно 5 дней, в то время как Фрейду пришлось позировать всего 4 часа. «Он рисует медленно и любит посплетничать» — сказал Хокни. «Когда я рисую, я погружаюсь в тишину». Хокни сделал много небольших карандашных рисунков, картину писал уже по эскизам и по памяти в своей мастерской. На портрете Хокни: Люсьен Фр…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @tresholder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tresholder” (@tresholder), 107 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tresholder.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.