Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

LostBean

@trench_camp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

275subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002084241382
TypeChannel
Username@trench_camp
DescriptionCliqueart и не только ✺ Ψ ||-// ☬ ғᴘᴇ Щп https://t.me/+me0PRQ7HjMc3NzMy
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/trench_camp

Growth

2757 Aug 2026, 23:16 — 275 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:45 — 275 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:168 Aug 2026, 08:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 274–276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:45275no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:16275first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
83.1%
avg views ÷ 275 subscribers
Avg views / post
229
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (27 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,829
Reactions total308
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
589
Videos
22
Links
46

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

616 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22736.9%
custom 54273586335936839268413.6%
custom 60868630939613297407712.5%
❤‍🔥7712.5%
😍6710.9%
custom 5434038407250594824467.47%
custom 5262955364336285678172.76%
🥴111.79%
💯101.62%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 616reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC67 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥰🤩🩵 Картинка для сломанного телефона госпожи собаки 🌟 #twentyonepilots #cliqueart

21🥴11custom 54273586335936839267

3 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC132 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @robyallonsy

друзья! разрабатываю новый проект по с twenty one pilots и мне очень нужны люди в микро-команду общей идеей поделюсь в ближайшее время (и в личных сообщениях), но на данный момент ситуация обстоит следующим образом: проект связан, в основном, с текстами в идеале — мне бы хотелось, чтобы у нас была возможность разместить проект на сайте и вывести текст в электронный формат (как электронную книгу). я допускаю мысль о

8custom 54273586335936839263custom 54340384072505948242

3 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC189 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Каждый ваш отзыв на брелочки хранится у нас с Reggiekid в избранном 🌸 иногда перечитываю их и улыбаюсь Честно говоря, вообще в начале даже не рассчитывала, что мы продадим даже 10 брелоков. Мне казалось это никому особо не зайдет (хотя Реджи была супер оптимисткой, когда мы обсуждали, сколько будет заказывать в типографии ахах я ей не верила...) 😞 а по итогу благодаря вам 40 брелочков разлетелись в конвертах по всей

14custom 54273586335936839266

3 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC604 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎧💔🤩 #twentyonepilots #cliqueart

❤‍🔥3021custom 543403840725059482411custom 54273586335936839262

3 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC130 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Alien guy 👽 #twentyonepilots #cliqueart

25custom 608686309396132974015💯10custom 54273586335936839262

21 Jul 2026, 19:18 UTC218 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сил нет, но рисовать хочется (и надо) Сейчас-сейчас только закончу пару проектов… 😟 Скорее бы показать их вам

😍28custom 608686309396132974012custom 542735863359368392611

21 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC246 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👚🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🐉 Первую партию брелочков очень охотно раскупили, спасибо вам ❤️❤️❤️ Но мне продолжают писать о наличии, поэтому мы с Реджи сделали еще немножко брелоков 💅 В наличии: 4 шт разобрали! Для заказа стучитесь ко мне ❤️

16custom 542735863359368392610

17 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC243 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sheff44kPhoto

🧘

24custom 543403840725059482411custom 60868630939613297408

14 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC199 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dina_dedeePhoto

Why'd you come? You knew you should have stayed #twentyonepilots

21

12 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC297 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Открытка с Гослингом для моей крутой подружки @trigo42 💜 ⭐️ С днем рождения ⭐️

custom 608686309396132974034custom 542735863359368392612custom 5434038407250594824116

6 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC218 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fffrafffPhoto

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ открываю предзаказы на мерч😛 с 06.07 до 05.08 (включительно) доставка яндекс или озон 300-400р (цена может немного поменяться) минимальная сумма заказа 400р *все брелочки будут на веревочке писать о заказе сюда @fefefffefef >отправляйте скриншот карты мерча с обозначением того что хотите купить >напишите способ доставки

12

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @trench_camp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 110,274 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LostBean” (@trench_camp), 275 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trench_camp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.